Abstract
Background
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of three different face types among Turkish young adults based on facial indices, to assess and compare the vertical and horizontal dimensions for each type, and to establish anthropometric norms for Turkish adults.
Methods
A total of 173 healthy young adults (83 females and 90 males) 17 to 25 years of age were examined. Using anthropometric landmarks, 8 horizontal and 10 vertical direct measurements were made with a millimetric compass.
Results
Using facial indices, 59 of the 173 subjects were classified as euryprosopic, 49 as mesoprosopic, and 65 as leptoproposic. In the total evaluation of both groups, all the parameters were higher in the males except forehead heights 1 and 2. A comparison of face types in females and males separately showed no significant differences between the parameters.
Conclusions
The data presented in this study may help plastic surgeons and orthodontists objectively determine the relationships between facial structures for different face types. Additionally, the facial anthropometric norms derived from this study may be useful in the treatment of Turkish patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tolleth H (1984) Observations on form and proportion. In: Hetter G (ed) Lipolysis: Theory and practice. Little Brown: Boston
Tolleth H (1987) Concepts for the plastic surgeon from art and sculpture. Clin Plast Surg 14:585–598
Vegter F, Hage JJ (2000) Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1090–1096
Bergmüller JG (1723) Anthropometria. J.J. Lotter: Augsburg
Da Vinci L (1786) Trattario della pittura. Bologna. In (ref.): Boyd E (ed) (1980) Origins of the study human growth. University of Oregon Health Sciences Center Foundation: Portland, p 167
Dürer A (1557) Les quatre livres d’Albert Dürer, peintre et géomètre très excellent, de la proportion des parties portraits des corps humains. C Perier: Paris
Elsholtz JS (1663) Anthropometria. A. Becman: Frankfurt am Oder
Dawei W, Guozheng Q, Mingli Z, Farkas LG (1997) Differences in horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations. Aesth Plast Surg 21:265–269
Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR, Chir B (1985) Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: Revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:328–337
Kelen E (1974) Leonardo da Vinci’s advice to artists. Thomas Nelson, Inc: Nashville
Lischer BE (1919) Variations and modifications of the facial features: An introductory study. Int J Orthod 5:495–507
Wuerpel EH (1937) On facial balance and harmony. Angle Orthod 7:81–89
Stoner MM (1955) A photometric analysis of the facial profile: A method of assessing facial change induced by orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 41:453–469
Burstone CJ (1958) The integumental profile. Am J Orthod 44:1–25
Neger M (1959) A quantitative method for the evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile. Am J Orthod 45:738–751
Bloom LA (1961) Perioral profile changes in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 47:371–379
Case CS (1964) The question of extraction in orthodontia. Am J Orthod 50:659–691
Merrifield LL (1966) The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 52:804–822
Ricketts RM (1968) Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 54:272–289
Legan HL, Burstone CJ (1980) Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognatic surgery. J Oral Surg 38:744–751
Davenport CB (1939) Postnatal development of the human outer nose. Proc Am Philos Soc 80:175–256
Meredith HV (1960) Changes in the form of the head and face during childhood. Growth 24:215–264
Farkas LG (1981) Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine. Elsevier: New York
Zingaro EA, Falces E (1987) Aesthetic anatomy of the non-Caucasian nose. Clin Plast Surg 14:749–765
Mantzikos T (1998) Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 114:1–7
Miyajima K, McNamara JA, Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T (1996) Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European–American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 110:431–438
Farkas LG (1994) Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. Raven Press: New York
Ulgen M (2000) Orthodontics: anomalies, etiology, growth and development, cephalometry, and diagnosis. Vol. 2. Yeditepe University Press House: Istanbul, p. 175
Arman A, Toygar U, Abuhijleh E (2004) Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in class III malocclusions. Angle Orthod 74:733–740
Frankel R, Frankel C (1988) Orthodontics in orofacial region with help of function regulators. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 20:277–309
McNamara JA Jr, Brust EW, Riolo ML (1993) Soft tissue evaluation of individuals with an ideal occlusion and a well-balanced face. In: McNamara JA Jr (ed) Esthetics and the treatment of facial form. Monograph 28. Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 115–146
Lehmann JA (1987) Soft tissue manifestations of aesthetic defects of the jaws: Diagnosis and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 14:767–783
Kasai K, Richards LC, Brown T (1993) Comparative study of craniofacial morphology in Japanese and Australian aboriginal populations. Hum Biol 65:821–834
Porter JP, Olson KL (2001) Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American woman. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:191–197
Sim RS, Smith JD, Chan AS (2000) Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2:113–120
Farkas LG, Munro IR, Chir B, Kolar JC (1985) Abnormal measurements and disproportions in the face of Down’s syndrome patients: Preliminary report of an anthropometric study. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:159–167
Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR (2002) Surface anatomy of the face in Down’s syndrome: Age-related changes of anthropometric proportions in the craniofacial regions. J Craniofac Surg 13:368–374
Farkas LG (1987) Age and sex-related changes in facial proportions. In: Farkas LG, Munro IR (eds) Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine. CC Thomas: Springfield, pp. 29–56
Bishara SE, Hession TJ, Peterson LC (1985) Longitudinal soft tissue profile changes: A study of three analyses. Am J Orthod 88:209–214
Farkas LG (1996) Accuracy of anthropometric measurements: Past, present, and future. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 33:10–18
Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RCK, Levin LS, Forrest CR (2002) Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesth Plast Surg 26:64–69
Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L (2000) Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesth Plast Surg 24:179–184
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gündüz Arslan, S., Genç, C., Odabaş, B. et al. Comparison of Facial Proportions and Anthropometric Norms Among Turkish Young Adults With Different Face Types. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 234–242 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9049-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9049-y