Abstract
Background
Pectus excavatum is the most frequent malformation of the rib cage. Functional aspects associated with this malformation often are absent even in adults not involved in competitive sports activities. Overall, these patients often live with extreme psychological discomfort when the malformations are minor. Traditionally, the correction of these malformations has been geared toward interventions that modify the architecture of the rib cage. However, all these interventions, even the most recent, involve considerably invasive major surgery. In fact, optimal results are not always achieved with corrective surgery using the insertion of silicone prosthesis, and patients often experience complications.
Methods
To correct intermediate and modest pectus excavatum in a stable manner and with the least amount of invasiveness, the authors developed a camouflage technique that uses porous prostheses made from high-density linear polyethylene. This material is generally used for reconstruction of the brain case. Between February 2001 and March 2006, in the I Unit of Plastic Surgery of the authors’ Institute, 11 adult pectus excavatum patients with no previous cardiorespiratory symptoms underwent the authors’ surgical technique. The average patient age was 29 years.
Results
Surgical repair was successful in all cases, and the average hospital stay was short. There were no complications during the follow-up period. The described approach repairs nonfunctional pectus excavatum in the adult with satisfying aesthetic and stable results, short hospital stay, and high patient popularity ratings.
Conclusions
The best therapeutic option for pectus excavatum, especially with intermediate or moderate severity, is still controversial: thoracic surgery or camouflage surgery with implant? Trying to address those issues we propose a new technique by a multidisciplinary, not aggressive approach using a high density linear polyethylene implant and Omentus flap and the early analysis of our data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barauskas V (2003) Indications for the surgical treatment of the funnel chest. Medicina (Kaunas) 39:555–561
Chavoin JP, Dahan M, Grolleau JL, Soubirac L, Wagner A, Foucras L, Darbas D, Pomar P (2003) Funnel chest: Filling technique with deep custom made implant. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 48(2):67–76
Choi JC, Iwamoto MA, Bstandig S, Rubin PAD, Shore JW (1999) MEDPOR Motility Coupling Post: A rabbit model. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 15:190–200
Coln D, Gunning T, Ramsay M, Swygert T, Vera R (2002) Early experience with the Nuss minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum in adults. World J Surg 26:1217–1221, Epub 2002 September 6
Einsiedel E, Clausner A (1999) Funnel chest: Psychological and psychosomatic aspects in children, youngsters, and young adults. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 40:733–736
Erbella J Jr, Behmand R, Cederna PS (2001) Endoscopically assisted pectus excavatum repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:213–216
Fonkalsrud EW, Beanes S, Hebra A, Adamson W, Tagge E (2002) Comparison of minimally invasive and modified Ravitch pectus excavatum repair. J Pediatr Surg 37:413–417
Freeman BS (1976) Proplast, a porous implant for contour restoration (no abstract available). Br J Plast Surg 29:158–164
Haller JA Jr, Scherer LR, Turner CS, Colombani PM (1989) Evolving management of pectus excavatum based on a single institutional experience of 664 patients. Ann Surg 209:578–582, discussion 582–583
Hodgkinson DJ (1997) Chest wall implants: Their use for pectus excavatum, pectoralis muscle tears, Poland’s syndrome, and muscular insufficiency. Aesth Plast Surg 21:7–15
Horch RE, Stoelben E, Carbon R, Sultan AA, Bach AD, Kneser U (2006) Pectus excavatum breast and chest deformity: Indications for aesthetic plastic surgery versus thoracic surgery in a multicenter experience. Aesth Plast Surg 30:403–411
Hougaard G, Svensson H, Holmqvist KG (1995) Casting the implant for reconstruction of pectus excavatum. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 29:227–231
Johnson PE (1996) Refining silicone implant correction of pectus excavatum through computed tomography. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:445–449
Lemperle G, Exner K (1983) Treatment of funnel chest with RTV-silicone implants (in German). Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 15:154–157
Leonhardt J, Kubler JF, Feiter J, Ure BM, Petersen C (2005) Complications of the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 40:e7–e9
Luzzi L, Voltolini L, Zacharias J, Campione A, Ghiribelli C, Di Bisceglie M, Gotti G (2004) Ten-year experience of bioabsorbable mesh support in pectus excavatum repair. Br J Plast Surg 57:733–740
Marks MW, Argenta LC, Lee DC (1984) Silicone implant correction of pectus excavatum: Indications and refinement in technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:52–58
Miller KA, Woods RK, Sharp RJ, Gittes GK, Wade K, Ashcraft KW, Snyder CL, Andrews WM, Murphy JP, Holcomb GW III (2001) Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: A single institution’s experience. Surgery 130:652–657, discussion 657–659
Moss RL, Albanese CT, Reynolds M (2001) Major complications after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: Case reports. J Pediatr Surg 36:155–158
Murray JF (1965) Correction of pectus excavatum by synthetic subcutaneous implant. Presented at the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, October
Nakuhara, et al. (1987) Operative outcomes in patients with funnel chest. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 93:577
Özgür F, Aksoy HM, Kayikçioglu A, Ariyürek M (1999) The effect of onlay MEDPOR implants on mandibular growth in young rabbits: An experimental study. Ann Plast Surg 42:No. 2
Paolini A, Ruggieri M, Leone Sossi FL, Paolini G, Dal Pra G, Scuderi N (1996) Pectus excavatum in adults: Destructive surgery or simple correction of an aesthetic defect? Riv Eur Sci Med Farmacol 18:11–17
Park HJ, Lee SY, Lee CS (2004) Complications associated with the Nuss procedure: Analysis of risk factors and suggested measures for prevention of complications. J Pediatr Surg 39:391–395, discussion 391–395
Rebeis EB, Samano MN, Santos Dias CT, Fernandez Â, Campos JRM, Jatene FB, Oliveira SA (2004) Anthropometric index for quantitative assessment of pectus excavatum. J Bras Pneumol 30:501–507
Rubin PAD, Popham JK, Bilyk JR, Shore JW (1994) Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10:96–103
Shamberger RC, Welch KJ (1988) Surgical repair of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 23:615–622
Sorensen JL (1988) Subcutaneous silicone implants in pectus excavatum. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 22:173–176
Watanabe A, Watanabe T, Obama T, Ohsawa H, Mawatari T, Ichimiya Y, Abe T (2004) The use of a lateral stabilizer increases the incidence of wound trouble following the Nuss procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 77:296–300
Wechselberger G, Ohlbauer M, Haslinger J, Schoeller T, Bauer T, Piza-Katzer H (2001) Silicone implant correction of pectus excavatum. Ann Plast Surg 47:489–493, Erratum in Ann Plast Surg 47:611, 2001
Wellisz T, Wallace RD (2000) Porous polyethylene and its biocompatibility. In: Terino EO, Flowers RS (eds) The art of alloplastic facial contouring. Mosby, St. Louis, pp. 261–272
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grappolini, S., Fanzio, P.M., D’Addetta, P.G.C. et al. Aesthetic Treatment of Pectus Excavatum: A New Endoscopic Technique Using a Porous Polyethylene Implant. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 105–110 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9025-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9025-6