Skip to main content
Log in

Aesthetic Treatment of Pectus Excavatum: A New Endoscopic Technique Using a Porous Polyethylene Implant

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pectus excavatum is the most frequent malformation of the rib cage. Functional aspects associated with this malformation often are absent even in adults not involved in competitive sports activities. Overall, these patients often live with extreme psychological discomfort when the malformations are minor. Traditionally, the correction of these malformations has been geared toward interventions that modify the architecture of the rib cage. However, all these interventions, even the most recent, involve considerably invasive major surgery. In fact, optimal results are not always achieved with corrective surgery using the insertion of silicone prosthesis, and patients often experience complications.

Methods

To correct intermediate and modest pectus excavatum in a stable manner and with the least amount of invasiveness, the authors developed a camouflage technique that uses porous prostheses made from high-density linear polyethylene. This material is generally used for reconstruction of the brain case. Between February 2001 and March 2006, in the I Unit of Plastic Surgery of the authors’ Institute, 11 adult pectus excavatum patients with no previous cardiorespiratory symptoms underwent the authors’ surgical technique. The average patient age was 29 years.

Results

Surgical repair was successful in all cases, and the average hospital stay was short. There were no complications during the follow-up period. The described approach repairs nonfunctional pectus excavatum in the adult with satisfying aesthetic and stable results, short hospital stay, and high patient popularity ratings.

Conclusions

The best therapeutic option for pectus excavatum, especially with intermediate or moderate severity, is still controversial: thoracic surgery or camouflage surgery with implant? Trying to address those issues we propose a new technique by a multidisciplinary, not aggressive approach using a high density linear polyethylene implant and Omentus flap and the early analysis of our data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barauskas V (2003) Indications for the surgical treatment of the funnel chest. Medicina (Kaunas) 39:555–561

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chavoin JP, Dahan M, Grolleau JL, Soubirac L, Wagner A, Foucras L, Darbas D, Pomar P (2003) Funnel chest: Filling technique with deep custom made implant. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 48(2):67–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi JC, Iwamoto MA, Bstandig S, Rubin PAD, Shore JW (1999) MEDPOR Motility Coupling Post: A rabbit model. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 15:190–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coln D, Gunning T, Ramsay M, Swygert T, Vera R (2002) Early experience with the Nuss minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum in adults. World J Surg 26:1217–1221, Epub 2002 September 6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Einsiedel E, Clausner A (1999) Funnel chest: Psychological and psychosomatic aspects in children, youngsters, and young adults. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 40:733–736

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Erbella J Jr, Behmand R, Cederna PS (2001) Endoscopically assisted pectus excavatum repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:213–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fonkalsrud EW, Beanes S, Hebra A, Adamson W, Tagge E (2002) Comparison of minimally invasive and modified Ravitch pectus excavatum repair. J Pediatr Surg 37:413–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman BS (1976) Proplast, a porous implant for contour restoration (no abstract available). Br J Plast Surg 29:158–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haller JA Jr, Scherer LR, Turner CS, Colombani PM (1989) Evolving management of pectus excavatum based on a single institutional experience of 664 patients. Ann Surg 209:578–582, discussion 582–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hodgkinson DJ (1997) Chest wall implants: Their use for pectus excavatum, pectoralis muscle tears, Poland’s syndrome, and muscular insufficiency. Aesth Plast Surg 21:7–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horch RE, Stoelben E, Carbon R, Sultan AA, Bach AD, Kneser U (2006) Pectus excavatum breast and chest deformity: Indications for aesthetic plastic surgery versus thoracic surgery in a multicenter experience. Aesth Plast Surg 30:403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hougaard G, Svensson H, Holmqvist KG (1995) Casting the implant for reconstruction of pectus excavatum. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 29:227–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson PE (1996) Refining silicone implant correction of pectus excavatum through computed tomography. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:445–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemperle G, Exner K (1983) Treatment of funnel chest with RTV-silicone implants (in German). Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 15:154–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leonhardt J, Kubler JF, Feiter J, Ure BM, Petersen C (2005) Complications of the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 40:e7–e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Luzzi L, Voltolini L, Zacharias J, Campione A, Ghiribelli C, Di Bisceglie M, Gotti G (2004) Ten-year experience of bioabsorbable mesh support in pectus excavatum repair. Br J Plast Surg 57:733–740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marks MW, Argenta LC, Lee DC (1984) Silicone implant correction of pectus excavatum: Indications and refinement in technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:52–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller KA, Woods RK, Sharp RJ, Gittes GK, Wade K, Ashcraft KW, Snyder CL, Andrews WM, Murphy JP, Holcomb GW III (2001) Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: A single institution’s experience. Surgery 130:652–657, discussion 657–659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moss RL, Albanese CT, Reynolds M (2001) Major complications after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: Case reports. J Pediatr Surg 36:155–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray JF (1965) Correction of pectus excavatum by synthetic subcutaneous implant. Presented at the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, October

  21. Nakuhara, et al. (1987) Operative outcomes in patients with funnel chest. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 93:577

  22. Özgür F, Aksoy HM, Kayikçioglu A, Ariyürek M (1999) The effect of onlay MEDPOR implants on mandibular growth in young rabbits: An experimental study. Ann Plast Surg 42:No. 2

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paolini A, Ruggieri M, Leone Sossi FL, Paolini G, Dal Pra G, Scuderi N (1996) Pectus excavatum in adults: Destructive surgery or simple correction of an aesthetic defect? Riv Eur Sci Med Farmacol 18:11–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Park HJ, Lee SY, Lee CS (2004) Complications associated with the Nuss procedure: Analysis of risk factors and suggested measures for prevention of complications. J Pediatr Surg 39:391–395, discussion 391–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rebeis EB, Samano MN, Santos Dias CT, Fernandez Â, Campos JRM, Jatene FB, Oliveira SA (2004) Anthropometric index for quantitative assessment of pectus excavatum. J Bras Pneumol 30:501–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rubin PAD, Popham JK, Bilyk JR, Shore JW (1994) Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10:96–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shamberger RC, Welch KJ (1988) Surgical repair of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 23:615–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sorensen JL (1988) Subcutaneous silicone implants in pectus excavatum. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 22:173–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Watanabe A, Watanabe T, Obama T, Ohsawa H, Mawatari T, Ichimiya Y, Abe T (2004) The use of a lateral stabilizer increases the incidence of wound trouble following the Nuss procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 77:296–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wechselberger G, Ohlbauer M, Haslinger J, Schoeller T, Bauer T, Piza-Katzer H (2001) Silicone implant correction of pectus excavatum. Ann Plast Surg 47:489–493, Erratum in Ann Plast Surg 47:611, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wellisz T, Wallace RD (2000) Porous polyethylene and its biocompatibility. In: Terino EO, Flowers RS (eds) The art of alloplastic facial contouring. Mosby, St. Louis, pp. 261–272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo M. Fanzio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grappolini, S., Fanzio, P.M., D’Addetta, P.G.C. et al. Aesthetic Treatment of Pectus Excavatum: A New Endoscopic Technique Using a Porous Polyethylene Implant. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 105–110 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9025-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9025-6

Keywords

Navigation