Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Fate of Diced Cartilage Grafts of Traumatized Versus Nontraumatized Origin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Diced cartilage grafts have long been used in rhinoplasty. Along with their various reported advantages, they also have some disadvantages. The irregular resorption rate of the engrafted mass is one of the major issues noted with diced cartilage grafts. An explanation for the unpredictable resorption rate has not yet been elucidated. This study aimed to determine the role of traumatized versus nontraumatized cartilage as the source of diced cartilage grafts.

Methods

This study included the noses of 32 patients (19 traumatized noses and 13 nontraumatized noses) who underwent surgery using Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage grafts.

Results

The most remarkable result noted in this study was that a Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage graft, if prepared from traumatized cartilage (in 19 patients), failed to maintain a stable long-term volume. Partial volume loss was noted in 100% of these patients. However, the rate of this partial resorption was different for every individual and could not be predicted. The highest retention of cartilage graft volume was seen primarily over the nasal osseocartilaginous junction. In nontraumatized patients, however, the engrafted mass maintained long-term volume stability. These patients evidenced no visible external irregularities, and only a few very slight imperfections were noted with finger palpation.

Conclusion

Diced cartilage of traumatic origin is not recommended for any purpose. In such cases, the authors’ engrafting algorithm consists of autobone or ear conchal cartilage grafts for dorsal augmentation, columellar struts from the nontraumatized part of the septum, and spreader grafts from the nontraumatized part of the septum or ear concha.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acarturk S, Arslan E, Demirkan F, Unal S: An algorithm for deciding alternative grafting materials used in secondary rhinoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:409, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arslan E, Unal S, Demirkan F, Gurbuz O, Beden V: Augmentation rhinoplasty with a combination of triple cartilage grafts for secondary rhinoplasty in a middle-aged population. Aesth Plast Surg 29:240, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aston JE, Bentley G: Repair of articular surfaces by allografts of articular and growth-plate cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 68:29, 1986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CT, Burton-Wurster N, Borden C, Hueffer K, Bloom SE, Lust G: Chondrocyte necrosis and apoptosis in impact damaged articular cartilage. J Orthop Res 19:703, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel RK, Calvert JW: Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2156, 2004

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Lima DD, Hashimoto S, Chen PC, Colwell CW, Lotz MK: Human chondrocyte apoptosis in response to mechanical injury. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9:712, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Erol OO: The Turkish delight: A pliable graft for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2229, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ertas NM, Hucumenoglu S, Besalti O, Ozak A, Celebioglu S: The effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose on diced cartilage xenograft: An experimental study. Ann Plast Surg 45:224, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gu Z, Shibata T, Cao Z, Feng J, Hu J: Chondrocyte apoptosis in temporomandibular joints with disc displacement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1026, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guerrerosantos J: Temporoparietal free fascia grafts in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:465, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guerrerosantos J, Trabanino C, Guerrerosantos F: Multifragmented cartilage wrapped with fascia in augmentation rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:804, 2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Loening AM, James IE, Levenston ME, Badger AM, Frank EH, Kurz B, Nuttall ME,Hung HH, Blake SM, Grodzinsky AJ, Lark MW: Injurious mechanical compression of bovine articular cartilage induces chondrocyte apoptosis. Arch Biochem Biophys 381:205, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lucchinetti E, Adams CS, Horton WE Jr, Torzilli PA: Cartilage viability after repetitive loading: A preliminary report. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10:71, 2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mostafapour SP, Hockenbery DM, Rubel EW: Life and death in otolaryngology: Mechanisms of apoptosis and its role in the pathology and treatment of disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:729, 1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Patwari P, Gaschen V, James IE, Berger E, Blake SM, Lark MW, Grodzinsky AJ, Hunziker EB: Ultrastructural quantification of cell death after injurious compression of bovine calf articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12:245, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Redman SN, Dowthwaite GP, Thomson BM, Archer CW: The cellular responses of articular cartilage to sharp and blunt trauma. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12:106, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tew SR, Kwan AP, Hann A, Thomson BM, Archer CW: The reactions of articular cartilage to experimental wounding: Role of apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum 43:215, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tung Chen C, Wurster NB, Borden C, Hueffer K, Bloom SE, Lust G: Chondrocyte necrosis and apoptosis in impact damaged articular cartilage. J Orthop Res 19:703,2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yilmaz S, Erocen AR, Can Z, Yenidunya S, Edali N, Yormuk E: Viability of diced crushed cartilage grafts and the effects of Surgicel (oxidized regenerated cellulose) on cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1054, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emrah Arslan M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arslan, E., Majka, C. & Polat, A. The Fate of Diced Cartilage Grafts of Traumatized Versus Nontraumatized Origin. Aesth Plast Surg 31, 365–371 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0113-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0113-9

Keywords

Navigation