Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deskinning Versus Deepithelialization for Inferior Pedicle Reduction Mammoplasty: A Prospective Comparative Analysis

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

Deepithelialization is time consuming, but has been performed traditionally in reduction mammaplasty to ensure a better blood supply to the transposed nipple–areolar complex.

Methods:

For this study, 18 patients were recruited, and each patient served as an individual control by undergoing both deskinning and deepithelialization of the contralateral breast. The patient’s age, body mass index, specimen weight, complications, and subjective cosmetic assessment were recorded.

Results:

The mean age was 42 years, and the mean body mass index was 27.94 respectively. There were no differences recorded in terms of complications or patient perceived cosmetic outcomes. The only statistical difference involved the times required for deepithelialization (15.5 min) and deskinning (6 min). Deskinning thus saved approximately 9 min.

Conclusions:

Deskinning is as effective as deepithelialization and is significantly more expedient, with no added risk to the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apfelberg DB, Smoller B: Ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser with CPG scanner for deepithelialization: Clinical and Histologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:2089, 1997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barr ST, Young RB, Widenhouse BG, Davis D: Bloodless pedicle deepithelialization in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconst Surg 111:493, 2003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crepeau R, Klein HW: Reduction mammaplasty with inferior based glandular pedicle flap. Ann Plast Surg 9: 463, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fajardo LL, Bessen SC: Epidermal inclusion cyst after reduction mammaplasty. Radiology l86:103,1993

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hidalgo DA Improving safety, aesthetic results in inverted T scar breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:874, 1999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwuagwu OC, Platt AJ, Drew PJ: Breast reduction surgery in UK and Ireland: Current trends. Oral presentation, Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. April 2005. Glasgow, UK.

  7. Juma A, Miller JG, Laitung JKG: Pedicle deepithelialization in breast reduction and mastopexy using the electric dermatome. Plas Reconstr Surg 95:216, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kroll SS. A comparison of deepithelialization and deskinning in inferior pedicle breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:913,1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwarzmann E. Beitrag zur Vermeidng von Mammillennekrose bei einzeitiger Mammaplastik schewere Falle. Rev Chir Strut 7:206,1937

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. Drew F.R.C.S., F.R.C.S. (gen), M.Ch., M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iwuagwu, O.C., Drew, P.J. Deskinning Versus Deepithelialization for Inferior Pedicle Reduction Mammoplasty: A Prospective Comparative Analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 29, 202–204 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-0120-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-0120-7

Keywords

Navigation