Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Use of the Ipsilateral Versus Contralateral Pedicle and Vertical Versus Horizontal Flap Inset Models in TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction: The Aesthetic Outcome

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of an ipsilateral or a contralateral rectus abdominis muscle as a pedicle and comparison of their advantages and disadvantages in TRAM flap breast reconstruction have been reported in the literature. In our clinical experience with 22 pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions, the use of either an ipsilateral or contralateral pedicle was found to be equivocal regarding the flap viability and the aesthetic outcome. Thus, it seems better to decide their use according to the needs of an individual patient.

In our series, the contralateral pedicled TRAM flap with a vertical flap inset was preferred in patients with a small opposite breast or in patients with infraclavicular tissue losses (four patients). The ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction with a horizontal flap inset was preferred in patients with a full and attractive opposite breast, unless they received adjuvant radiotherapy (six patients). In patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy the contralateral pedicle was used regardless of the inset model preferred (10 patients). Bilateral TRAM flap breast reconstruction was applied in one of our cases, which is not included in the three categories above mentioned. The aesthetic outcome was determined by analyzing a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Overall satisfaction was achieved in 17 patients. Four patients were dissatisfied.

We think that choosing the correct flap inset model is one of the most important factors in achieving a satisfactory aesthetic outcome. Choosing the correct pedicle regarding the type of the flap inset model is equally important to facilitate technical ease during flap transposition and to improve flap survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrade AN, Baxter N, Semple JL: Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bostwick J: Plastic and reconstructive breast surgery. Quality Medical Publishing: St. Louis, MO, p. 760–784, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clugston PA, Lennox PA, Thompson RP: Intraoperative vascular monitoring of ipsilateral vs. contralateral TRAM flaps. Ann Plast Surg 41:6, 1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clugston PA, Gingrass MK, Azurin D, Fisher J: Ipsilateral pedicled TRAM Raps: the safer alternative? Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2000

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evans GR, David CL, Loyer EM, Storm E, Waldron C, Ortega R, Ainslie N, Wang B, Janjan N: The long-term effects of internal mammary chain irradiation and its role in the vascular supply of the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 35:4, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hanks SH, Lyons JA, Crowe J, Lucas A, Yetman RJ: The acute effects of postoperative radiation therapy on the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap used in immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:5, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartrampf CR Jr., Anton MA, Bried JT: Breast reconstruction with the transverse abdominal island (TRAM) flap. In: Georgiade SG, Riefkohl R, Levin LS (eds.) Plastic, maxillofacial and reconstructive surgery, 3rd ed. William & Wilkins: Baltimore, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt KK, Baldwin BJ, Stoom EA, Ames FC, McNeese MD, Kroll SS, Singletary SE: Feasibility of postmastectomy radiation therapy after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 4:5, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Missana MC, Levy C, Barreau-Pouhaer L: Radiotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction with myocutaneous flap in breast cancer of reserved prognosis. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 45:2, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  10. Olding M, Emory RE: Preferential use of the ipsilateral pedicle in TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 40:4, 1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tran NV, Evans GR, Kroll SS, Baldwin BJ, Miller MJ, Reece GP, Robb GL: Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:2, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams JK, Bostwick J, Bried JT, Mackay G, Landry J, Benton J, Joseph B: TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiation treatment. Ann Surg 221:6, 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Bried JT, Mackay G: The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:5, 1997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aret Çerçi Özkan.

Additional information

This study has been presented in 1st Congress of The World Society for Breast Health (September 22–26, 2001 Istanbul) and in 23rd Turkish Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery National Congress (September 27–30, 2001 Istanbul).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özkan, A.Ç., Çizmeci, O., Aydın, H. et al. The Use of the Ipsilateral Versus Contralateral Pedicle and Vertical Versus Horizontal Flap Inset Models in TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction: The Aesthetic Outcome. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 26, 451–456 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-002-1495-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-002-1495-y

Key words

Navigation