Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predator attack patterns influence vigilance in a virtual experiment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frequency and unpredictability of predator attacks can substantially influence vigilance patterns in prey animals. However, the lack of control over predator behavior hampers our understanding of the effect of predator attack patterns on vigilance. To circumvent this limitation, I developed a virtual experiment in which the behavior of the (virtual) predator was under full control of the experimenter. In the virtual experiment, I altered the frequency and unpredictability of attacks to document how human subjects (N = 45), which acted as surrogate prey, altered their vigilance in response to changes in predator attack patterns. Subjects increased the frequency of their vigilance bouts when the virtual predator attacked more frequently and increased vigilance bout duration when the predator attacked more unpredictably, thus showing an increase in vigilance when predation risk increased. Other features of vigilance in the virtual environment also fitted predictions from current theories of vigilance. In particular, subjects overemphasized safety in the early stages of the experiment when learning about predator attack patterns. Strong individual differences in both the frequency and duration of vigilance bouts also emerged in the virtual environment. Such individual differences feature prominently in the vigilance literature in birds and mammals. The virtual environment thus provides a unique tool to assess vigilance patterns in a controlled environment.

Significance statement

Predator attacks can vary substantially in frequency and unpredictability. Patterns of predator attacks are likely to influence vigilance patterns in prey animals. However, the lack of control over predator behavior hampers our understanding of the effect of predator attack patterns on vigilance. To circumvent this limitation, I developed a virtual experiment in which the predator was under full control of the experimenter. I altered the frequency and unpredictability of attacks to document how human subjects, which acted as surrogate prey, altered their vigilance in response to changes in predator attack patterns. The results show that subjects changed the frequency and duration of vigilance bouts in response to changes in predator attack patterns. The virtual experiment provides a unique tool to assess vigilance patterns in a controlled environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ale SB, Brown JS (2007) The contingencies of group size and vigilance. Evol Ecol Res 9:1263–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins A, Redpath SM, Little RM, Amar A (2017) Experimentally manipulating the landscape of fear to manage problem animals. J Wildlife Manage 81:610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH (2007) Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull 133:1–24

  • Bateson M, Brilot B, Nettle D (2011) Anxiety: an evolutionary approach. Can J Psychiatr 56:707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G (2008) What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance? Behav Ecol 19:1361–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G (2015) Animal vigilance: monitoring predators and competitors. Academic Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G, Ruxton GD (2003) Changes in vigilance with group size under scramble competition. Am Nat 161:672–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G, Ruxton GD (2008) Disentangling risk dilution and collective detection in the antipredator vigilance of semipalmated sandpipers in flocks. Anim Behav 75:1837–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G, Ruxton GD (2012a) Changes in anti-predator vigilance over time caused by a war of attrition between predator and prey. Behav Ecol 23:368–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G, Ruxton GD (2012b) Vigilance decreases with time at loafing sites in gulls (Larus spp.). Ethology 118:733–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G, Ruxton GD (2016) Modeling scan and interscan durations in antipredator vigilance. J Theor Biol 390:86–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff PA, Blumstein DT (2009) Peripheral obstructions influence marmot vigilance: integrating observational and experimental results. Behav Ecol 20:1111–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boujja-Miljour H, Leighton PA, Beauchamp G (2018) Individual vigilance profiles in flocks of house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Can J Zool 96:1016–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouskila A, Blumstein DT (1992) Rules of thumb for hazard assessment: predictions from a dynamic model. Am Nat 139:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T, Martindale S, Pulliam HR (1980) Avian flocking in the presence of a predator. Nature 285:400–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter AJ, Pays O, Goldizen AW (2009) Individual variation in the relationship between vigilance and group size in eastern grey kangaroos. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Mangel M (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor Pop Biol 30:45–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creel S, Schuette P, Christianson D (2014) Effects of predation risk on group size, vigilance, and foraging behavior in an African ungulate community. Behav Ecol 25:773–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar RIM, Cornah L, Daly FJ, Bowyer KM (2002) Vigilance in human groups: a test of alternative hypotheses. Behaviour 139:695–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AM, Best EC, Blomberg SP, Goldizen AW (2013) Individual traits influence vigilance in wild female eastern grey kangaroos. Aust J Zool 61:332–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks B, Dobson FS (2007) Mechanisms of the group-size effect on vigilance in Columbian ground squirrels: dilution versus detection. Anim Behav 73:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favreau F-R, Goldizen AW, Pays O (2010) Interactions among social monitoring, anti-predator vigilance and group size in eastern grey kangaroos. Proc R Soc B 277:2089–2095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Favreau F-R, Goldizen AW, Fritz H, Blomberg SP, Best EC, Pays O (2014) Within-population differences in personality and plasticity in the trade-off between vigilance and foraging in kangaroos. Anim Behav 92:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2012) Sensory basis of vigilance behavior in birds: synthesis and future prospects. Behav Process 89:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher KA, Stankowich T (2018) Antipredator strategies of striped skunks in response to cues of aerial and terrestrial predators. Anim Behav 143:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid A (1997) Vigilance by female Dall’s sheep: interaction between predation risk factors. Anim Behav 53:799–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes N, Semin GR (2020) Mapping human vigilance: the influence of conspecifics. Evol Hum Behav 41:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven M, Hill K (2009) Why do men hunt? A reevaluation of “man the hunter” and the sexual division of labor. Curr Anthropol 50:51–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart D, Sussman RW (2009) Man the hunted: primates, predators, and human evolution. Westview, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Headland TN, Greene HW (2011) Hunter–gatherers and other primates as prey, predators, and competitors of snakes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:E1470–E1474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch BT (2002) Social monitoring and vigilance behavior in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AL, Brown S, Sherratt TN, Ruxton GD (2005) The effects of group size, shape and composition on ease of detection of cryptic prey. Behaviour 142:811–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kameda T, Tamura R (2007) “To eat or not to be eaten?” Collective risk-monitoring in groups. J Exp Soc Psychol 43:168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent MIA, Herbert-Read JE, McDonald G, Wood AJ, Ward AJW (2019) Fine-scale behavioural adjustments of prey on a continuum of risk. Proc R Soc B 286:20190448

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lendrem DW (1984) Flocking, feeding and predation risk: absolute and instantaneous feeding rates. Anim Behav 32:298–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv Stud Behav 27:215–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (2002) Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Zollner PA, Bednekoff PA (1999) Predation, scramble competition, and the vigilance group size effect in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathot KJ, van den Hout PJ, Piersma T, Kempenaers B, Réale D, Dingemanse NJ (2011) Disentangling the roles of frequency-vs. state-dependence in generating individual differences in behavioural plasticity. Ecol Lett 14:1254–1262

  • Maximino C, de Brito TM, Gouveia A Jr (2010) Construct validity of behavioral models of anxiety: where experimental psychopathology meets ecology and evolution. Psychol Neurosci 3:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI (1992) Evolutionarily stable levels of vigilance as a function of group size. Anim Behav 43:641–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobbs D, Hagan CC, Dalgleish T, Silston B, Prévost C (2015) The ecology of human fear: survival optimization and the nervous system. Front Neurosci 9:55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mobbs D, Trimmer PC, Blumstein DT, Dayan P (2018) Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology. Nat Rev Neurosci 19:419–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Monclús R, Rodel HG, von Holst D (2006) Fox odour increases vigilance in European rabbits: a study under semi-natural conditions. Ethology 112:1186–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz CA, Pendleton EL, Newcomb KL, Smith JE (2019) Conspecific presence and microhabitat features influence foraging decisions across ontogeny in a facultatively social mammal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73:42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pangle WM, Holekamp KE (2010) Functions of vigilance behaviour in a social carnivore, the spotted hyaena, Crocuta crocuta. Anim Behav 80:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Périquet S, Todd-Jones L, Valeix M et al (2012) Influence of immediate predation risk by lions on the vigilance of prey of different body size. Behav Ecol 23:970–976

  • Pulliam HR (1973) On the advantages of flocking. J Theor Biol 38:419–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Pyke GH, Caraco T (1982) The scanning behavior of juncos: a game-theoretical approach. J Theor Biol 95:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieucau G, Morand-Ferron J, Giraldeau L-A (2010) Group size effect in nutmeg mannikin: between-individuals behavioral differences but same plasticity. Behav Ecol 21:684–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieucau G, Blanchard P, Martin JGA, Favreau F-R, Goldizen AW, Pays O (2012) Investigating differences in vigilance tactic use within and between the sexes in eastern grey kangaroos. PLoS One 7:e44801

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts G (1996) Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim Behav 51:1077–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Jackson AL, Tosh CR (2007) Confusion of predators does not rely on specialist coordinated behavior. Behav Ecol 18:590–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Samuel NE, Holmes G, Baddeley R, Cuthill IC (2015) Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:867–872

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Mathot KJ, Moirón M, Montiglio P-O, Wolf M, Dingemanse NJ (2015) Animal personality and state–behaviour feedbacks: a review and guide for empiricists. Trends Ecol Evol 30:50–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sirot E, Pays O (2011) On the dynamics of predation risk perception for a vigilant forager. J Theor Biol 276:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoet G (2010) PsyToolkit: a software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behav Res Methods 42:1096–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terhune JM, Brillant SW (1996) Harbour seal vigilance decreases over time since haul out. Anim Behav 51:757–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosh CR, Jackson AL, Ruxton GD (2006) The confusion effect in predatory neural networks. Am Nat 167:E52–E65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trouilloud W, Delisle A, Kramer DL (2004) Head raising during foraging and pausing during intermittent locomotion as components of antipredator vigilance in chipmunks. Anim Behav 67:789–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Marel A, López-Darias M, Waterman JM (2019) Group-enhanced predator detection and quality of vigilance in a social ground squirrel. Anim Behav 151:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler HC, Hik DS (2014) Giving-up densities and foraging behaviour indicate possible effects of shrub encroachment on arctic ground squirrels. Anim Behav 95:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder B, Smith EA (1981) Hunter-gatherer foraging strategies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz P, Wawra M (1986) Vigilance and group size in Homo sapiens. Ethology 71:283–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorzinski JL, Platt ML (2014) Selective attention in peacocks during predator detection. Anim Cogn 17:767–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yorzinski JL, Penkunas MJ, Platt ML, Coss RG (2014) Dangerous animals capture and maintain attention in humans. Evol Psychol 12:534–548

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank my three beta-testers Florent Dery, Barbara Vuillaume, and Sophiane Béland for constructive feedbacks on the virtual experiment and all colleagues who participated in the study. I thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Montreal, Canada

    Guy Beauchamp

Authors
  1. Guy Beauchamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Subjects gave their prior consent to participate in the study. To protect personal information, all data were collected anonymously.

Additional information

Communicated by P. A. Bednekoff

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beauchamp, G. Predator attack patterns influence vigilance in a virtual experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74, 49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02833-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02833-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation