Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in nocturnal light levels does not alter mate choice behavior in female eastern gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nocturnal light levels vary throughout the course of the lunar cycle, being darkest during the new moon and brightest during the full moon. Many nocturnal animals change their behavior in response to this natural variation in moonlight intensity. Frequently, these behavioral changes can be attributed to the way in which moonlight affects the ability of predators to spot potential prey. Mate sampling females may expose themselves to predators, making mate choice a behavior likely influenced by moonlight. Because mate choice is an important cause of sexual selection, understanding the causes of variation in mate choice decisions can yield a better understanding of the strength and direction of sexual selection under natural conditions. We predicted that female eastern gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor) would prefer longer calls (i.e., more attractive males) and/or be choosier, under darker conditions, because cover of darkness may aid in predator evasion. However, light treatment did not affect how females responded to variation in call duration, nor did it affect female choosiness or aspects of their approach behavior. This suggests that in gray treefrogs, variation in light levels associated with the changing phases of the moon does not alter the sexual selection regime on male call traits.

Significance statement

Looking for the perfect mate can be very dangerous, especially when environmental conditions make it more likely to be spotted by potential predators. Changes in mate choice behavior associated with predator exposure is quite common in nature, yet have rarely been examined in connection with the drastic variation in nocturnal illumination associated with the changing phases of the moon. We investigated whether females of a nocturnal treefrog change their behavior depending on whether they look for mates under simulated new moon or full moon conditions. We found that females preferred longer calls under both conditions, and that they also did not move more stealthily during bright compared to dark conditions. Our results suggest that males with long calls always have a mating advantage, and that sexual selection by female choice is uniformly strong across the lunar cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson MB (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Backwell PR, Passmore NI (1990) Suitable approach perches affect female phonotaxis in an arboreal frog. Herpetologica 46:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Baugh AT, Ryan MJ (2010) Ambient light alters temporal updating behaviour during mate choice in a Neotropical frog. Can J Zool 88:448–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonachea LA, Ryan MJ (2011a) Predation risk increases permissiveness for heterospecific advertisement calls in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Anim Behav 82:347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonachea LA, Ryan MJ (2011b) Simulated predation risk influences female choice in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Ethology 117:400–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonachea LA, Ryan MJ (2011c) Localization error and search costs during mate choice in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Ethology 117:56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch J, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2000) Signal variation and call preferences for whine frequency in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan BW (1993) Effects of enhanced lighting on the behaviour of nocturnal frogs. Anim Behav 45:893–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan BW (1998) Low-illumination prey detection by squirrel treefrogs. J Herpetol 32:270–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell SR, Mackessy SP, Clarke JA (2008) Microhabitat use by brown treesnakes (Boiga irregularis): effects of moonlight and prey. J Herpetol 42:246–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channing A (2001) Amphibians of central and southern Africa. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hilldale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman SW, Patricelli GL, Borgia G (2004) Variable female preferences drive complex male displays. Nature 428:742–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings ME, Bernal XE, Reynaga R, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2008) Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state in Physalaemus pustulosus females. J Exp Biol 211:1203–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diekamp B, Gerhardt HC (1995) Selective phonotaxis to advertisement calls in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor: behavioral experiments and neurophysiological correlates. J Comp Physiol A 177:173–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren E (1992) Predation risk affects mate choice in a gobiid fish. Am Nat 140:1041–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler-Finn KD, Rodríguez RL (2012) Experience-zediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment. Evolution 66:459–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1987) Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea. Anim Behav 35:1479–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1992) Conducting playback experiments and interpreting their results. In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Springer, New York, pp 59–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (2005) Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems. Evolution 59:395–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC, Tanner SD, Corrigan CM, Walton HC (2000) Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor). Behav Ecol 11:663–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin J-GJ, Briggs SE (1996) Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy. Anim Behav 51:117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez D, Richardson C, Lengagne T, Plenet S, Joly P, Léna JP, Théry M (2009) The role of nocturnal vision in mate choice: females prefer conspicuous males in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2351–2358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong A, Gibson RM (1996) Reversal of female preference after visual exposure to a predator in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 52:1007–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant R, Halliday T, Chadwick E (2012) Amphibians’ response to the lunar synodic cycle—a review of current knowledge, recommendations, and implications for conservation. Behav Ecol 24:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick AV, Dill LM (1993) Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim Behav 46:193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höbel G, Barta T (2014) Adaptive plasticity in calling site selection in grey treefrogs (Hyla versicolor). Behaviour 151:741–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD (2005) Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait. Am Nat 166:79–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB, Basolo AL (2003) Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail. Behav Ecol 14:619–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilmer JT, Fowler-Finn KD, Gray DA, Höbel G, Rebar D, Reichert MS, Rodríguez RL (2017) Describing mate preference functions and other function-valued traits. J Evol Biol 30:1658–1673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Brown J, Mukherjee S, Berger-Tal O, Bouskila A (2010) Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:1469–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillywhite HB, Brischoux F (2012) Is it better in the moonlight? Nocturnal activity of insular cottonmouth snakes increases with lunar light levels. J Zool 286:194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longland WS, Price MV (1991) Direct observations of owls and heteromyid rodents: can predation risk explain microhabitat use? Ecology 72:2261–2273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch KS, Rand AS, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W (2005) Plasticity in female mate choice associated with changing reproductive states. Anim Behav 69:689–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer K, Kirkpatrick M (2005) Up hill, down dale: quantitative genetics of curvaceous traits. Philos T Roy Soc B 360:1443–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy CG, Gerhardt HC (2002) Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa). Behav Ecol 13:472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neelon DP, Höbel G (2017) Social plasticity in choosiness in green tree frogs, Hyla cinerea. Behav Ecol (published online), https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx103)

  • Prugh LR, Golden CD (2014) Does moonlight increase predation risk? Meta-analysis reveals divergent responses of nocturnal mammals to lunar cycles. J Anim Ecol 83:504–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand AS, Bridarolli ME, Dries L, Ryan MJ (1997) Light levels influence female choice in túngara frogs: predation risk assessment? Copeia 1997:447–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert MS, Höbel G (2015) Modality interactions alter the shape of acoustic mate preference functions in gray treefrogs. Evolution 69:2384–2398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert MS, Symes LB, Höbel G (2016) Lighting up sound preferences: cross-modal influences on the precedence effect in treefrogs. Anim Behav 119:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie MG (1992) Setbacks in the search for mate-preference genes. Trends Ecol Evol 7:328–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RL, Ramaswamy K, Cocroft RB (2006) Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2585–2593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundus AS, Santer RD, Hebets EA (2010) Multimodal courtship efficacy of Schizocosa retrorsa wolf spiders: implications of an additional signal modality. Behav Ecol 21:701–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runkle LS, Wells KD, Robb CC, Lance SL (1994) Individual, nightly, and seasonal variation in calling behavior of the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor: implications for energy expenditure. Behav Ecol 5:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1985) The túngara frog: a study in sexual selection and communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JJ, Bee MA, Tanner SD (2000) A behavioral and neurobiological study of the responses of gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor to the calls of a predator, Rana catesbeiana. Herpetologica 2000:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JJ, Buchanan BW, Gerhardt HC (2001) Female mate choice in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:443–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur J, Aubin T, Simonis C (2008) Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics 18:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan BK, Hinshaw SH (1992) Female choice and selection on male calling behaviour in the grey treefrog Hyla versicolor. Anim Behav 44:733–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RC, Klein BA, Ryan MJ (2011) Inter-signal interaction and uncertain information in anuran multimodal signals. Curr Zool 57:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Norton S (2007) Preference for male traits in female wolf spiders varies with the choice of available males, female age and reproductive state. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:631–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (2010) The ecology and behavior of amphibians. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1983) Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q Rev Biol 58:155–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Neelon, R. Gremminger, A. Heesacker, C. Robertson, and T. Trinklein for assistance in the field and in running playback trials. Staff at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Field Station gave logistical support, and Nancy and Michael Byers graciously allowed us to collect frogs on their land. We also thank the reviewers for their time and suggestions on this manuscript.

Funding

The study was indirectly supported by the Office of Undergraduate Research of the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, by providing SURF fellowships to a number of undergraduate students.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria A. Underhill.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

All applicable national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. We received ethical clearance from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (protocol number 15–16 #43).

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Additional information

Communicated by K. Summers

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 64 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Underhill, V.A., Höbel, G. Variation in nocturnal light levels does not alter mate choice behavior in female eastern gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 151 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2386-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2386-1

Keywords

Navigation