Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ability to reorient is weakly correlated with central-place versus non-central-place foraging in acacia ants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive abilities evolve by natural selection to help an organism cope with problems encountered in the organism’s typical environment. In acacia ants, coevolution with the acacia tree led workers to forage exclusively on the host plant (“in-nest” foraging), instead of the central-place foraging typical for most social insects. To test whether foraging ecology altered the orientation skills of acacia ants, we developed a novel field disorientation assay to evaluate the ability of foraging workers to quickly reorient after being disoriented (rotated) in an experimental arena. We compared 10 behaviors among disoriented and sham-treated workers of three in-nest foraging species (Pseudomyrmex nigrocinctus, P. flavicornis, and P. spinicola) and two central-place foraging species that regularly forage off the host tree (P. gracilis, P. nigropilosus). We predicted that experimental disorientation of workers should affect in-nest foraging species (acacia ants) more than central-place foraging species. Behavioral differences between control and disoriented ants were not consistently associated with foraging ecology, although the species least able to recover after disorientation was an acacia ant (P. nigrocinctus), and the species performing best after disorientation was a central-place forager (P. gracilis). Only one of the 10 behaviors studied consistently differed in experimentally disoriented workers compared to controls in all three species of acacia ants, whereas none of the experimentally disoriented central-place foragers differed from control workers for this specific behavior. Future studies could evaluate additional ant species living in obligate associations with plants, to further compare the cognitive abilities of in-nest versus central-place foraging organisms.

Significance statement

Foraging ecology influences the evolution of spatial orientation abilities. Acacia ants exclusively nest and forage on acacia trees; unlike most other ants that are central-place foragers, acacia ants therefore do not face the challenge of finding the way back home after collecting food. We compared the performance of three species of acacia ants to the performance of two species of central-place foragers on a disorientation assay in the field. We found that the ability to reorient was not consistently associated with foraging ecology, although the species least able to recover after disorientation was an acacia ant (P. nigrocinctus), and the species performing best after disorientation was a central-place forager (P. gracilis). Other behaviors related with the mutualism with the acacia tree—such as pruning nearby vegetation and falling off branches to attack potential herbivores—could also select for orientation abilities because workers reorient back to the host tree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostinelli C, Lund U (2013) R package “circular”: Circular Statistics (version 0.4-7). URL https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/circular/

  • Amador-Vargas S (2012a) Plant killing by mutualistic ants increases the density of host species seedlings in the dry forest of Costa Rica. Psyche (Stuttg) 2012:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amador-Vargas S (2012b) Run, robber, run: parasitic acacia ants use speed and evasion to steal food from ant-defended trees. Physiol Entomol 37:323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amador-Vargas S, Gronenberg W, Wcislo WT, Mueller U (2015) Specialization and group size: brain and behavioural correlates of colony size in ants lacking morphological castes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 282:20142502. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balda RP, Kamil A (2006) Linking life zones, life history traits, ecology, and spatial cognition in four allopatric southwestern seed caching corvids. Pap Behav Biol Sci 36

  • Balda RP, Kamil AC (1989) A comparative study of cache recovery by three corvid species. Anim Behav 38:486–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balda RP, Kamil AC (2002) Spatial and social cognition in corvids: an evolutionary approach. Cogn Anim Empir Theor Perspect Anim Cogn 129–134

  • Bednekoff PA, Balda RP, Kamil AC, Hile AG (1997) Long-term spatial memory in four seed-caching corvid species. Anim Behav 53:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2000) Long-range foraging by the honey-bee, Apis mellifera L. Funct Ecol 14:490–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg SP, Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein D, Evans C, Daniels J (2006) JWatcher 1.0. http://www.jwatcher.ucla.edu/

  • Bolhuis JJ, Macphail EM (2001) A critique of the neuroecology of learning and memory. Trends Cogn Sci 5:426–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D (2009) Tracker Video Analysis and Modeling Tool (Version 4.92)

  • Bühlmann C, Cheng K, Wehner R (2011) Vector-based and landmark-guided navigation in desert ants inhabiting landmark-free and landmark-rich environments. J Exp Biol 214:2845–2853. doi:10.1242/jeb.054601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Schultheiss P, Schwarz S et al (2014) Beginnings of a synthetic approach to desert ant navigation. Behav Process 102:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomicki G, Ward PS, Renner SS (2015) Macroevolutionary assembly of ant-plant symbioses: Pseudomyrmex ants and their ant-housing plants in the Neotropics. Proc R Soc B 282:2015–2200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) Memory for spatial and object-specific cues in food-storing and non-storing birds. J Comp Physiol A 174:371–379. doi:10.1007/BF00240218

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement LW, Köppen SCW, Brand WA, Heil M (2008) Strategies of a parasite of the ant–Acacia mutualism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:953–962. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0520-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collett M, Chittka L, Collett TS (2013) Spatial memory in insect navigation. Curr Biol 23:R789–R800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cristol DA, Reynolds EB, Leclerc JE et al (2003) Migratory dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis, have better spatial memory and denser hippocampal neurons than nonmigratory conspecifics. Anim Behav 66:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day L, Crews D, Wilczynski W (1999) Spatial and reversal learning in congeneric lizards with different foraging strategies. Anim Behav 57:393–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW, Longino JT, Snelling RR (1988) Pruning of host plant neighbors by ants: an experimental approach. Ecology 69:801–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer FC (1998) Spatial cognition: lessons from central-place foraging insects. In: Animal cognition in nature: The Convergence of Psychology and Biology in Laboratory and Field, R. P. Balda, I. M. Pepperberg & A. C. Kamil. pp 119–154

  • Frederickson ME, Greene MJ, Gordon DM (2005) “Devil”s gardens’ bedevilled by ants. Nature 437:495–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz SA, Purvis A (2010) Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: a new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits. Conserv Biol 24:1042–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Acevedo S, Rico-Arce L, Delgado-Salinas A et al (2010) Neotropical mutualism between Acacia and Pseudomyrmex: phylogeny and divergence times. Mol Phylogenet Evol 56:393–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson PE, Longino JT (2006) Hormigas. In: Hymenoptera de la región neotropical, Hanson, P. & Gauld, I. American Entomological Institute, p 994

  • Hilton SC, Krebs JK (1990) Spatial memory of four species of Parus: performance in an open-field analogue of a radial maze. Q J Exp Psychol Sect B 42:345–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber R, Knaden M (2015) Egocentric and geocentric navigation during extremely long foraging paths of desert ants. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 201:609–616. doi:10.1007/s00359-015-0998-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izzo T, Vasconcelos H (2002) Cheating the cheater: domatia loss minimizes the effects of ant castration in an Amazonian ant-plant. Oecologia 133:200–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20:249–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1974) Swollen-thorn acacias of Central America. Smithson Contrib Bot 13:1–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1975) Pseudomyrmex nigropilosa: a parasite of a mutualism. Science 188:936–937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knaden M, Graham P (2016) The sensory ecology of ant navigation: from natural environments to neural mechanisms. Annu Rev Entomol 61:63–76. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L (1995) Ecological correlates of social learning: problems and solutions for the comparative method. Behav Process 35:163–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macphail EM (1982) Brain and intelligence in vertebrates. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz W, Henzl M, Wallnofer B (1992) Tree killing by herbicide producing ants for the establishment of pure Tococa occidentalis populations in the Peruvian Amazon. Biodivers Conserv 1:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee LC, Boughman JW, Braithwaite VA (2008) Sympatric species of threespine stickleback differ in their performance in a spatial learning task. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1935–1945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. Anal Ecol Syst 155–177

  • Orme D, Freckleton R, Thomas G, Petzoldt T, Fritz S, Isaac N, Pearse W (2013) caper: Comparative Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R. R package version 0.5.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caper

  • Pahl M, Zhu H, Tautz J, Zhang S (2011) Large scale homing in honeybees. PLoS One 6:e19669. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Renner SS, Ricklefs RE (1998) Herbicidal activity of domatia-inhabiting ants in patches of Tococa guianensis and Clidemia heterophylla. Biotropica 30:324–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revell LJ (2012) phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol 3:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. University of Chicago Press, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati AG, Rodriguez K, Hare B (2014) The ecology of spatial memory in four lemur species. Anim Cogn 17:947–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss P, Schwarz S, Cheng K, Wehner R (2013) Foraging ecology of an Australian salt-pan desert ant (genus Melophorus). Aust J Zool 60:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz S, Cheng K (2010) Visual associative learning in two desert ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:2033–2041. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1016-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry DF (2006) Neuroecology. Annu Rev Psychol 57:167–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (2009) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (1990) Spatial memory in food-storing birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 329:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smulders TV, Gould KL, Leaver LA (2010) Using ecology to guide the study of cognitive and neural mechanisms of different aspects of spatial memory in food-hoarding animals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 365:883–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steck K, Hansson BS, Knaden M (2009) Smells like home: desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, use olfactory landmarks to pinpoint the nest. Front Zool 6:5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steck K, Hansson BS, Knaden M (2011) Desert ants benefit from combining visual and olfactory landmarks. J Exp Biol 214:1307–1312. doi:10.1242/jeb.053579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward PS (2014) The phylogeny and evolution of ants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (2009) The architecture of the desert ant’s navigational toolkit (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 12:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Wystrach A, Beugnon G, Cheng K (2012) Ants might use different view-matching strategies on and off the route. J Exp Biol 215:44–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wystrach A, Schwarz S, Baniel A, Cheng K (2013) Backtracking behaviour in lost ants: an additional strategy in their navigational toolkit. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20131677. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wystrach A, Philippides A, Aurejac A et al (2014) Visual scanning behaviours and their role in the navigation of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J Comp Physiol A 200:615–626. doi:10.1007/s00359-014-0900-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J, Narendra A, Stürzl W (2014) Looking and homing: how displaced ants decide where to go. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 369:20130034. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurbuchen A, Landert L, Klaiber J et al (2010) Maximum foraging ranges in solitary bees: only few individuals have the capability to cover long foraging distances. Biol Conserv 143:669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Natalia Ramírez Amador and Marianela Solís del Valle for field assistance; William Eberhard and Gilbert Barrantes for discussion of ideas; the staff at OTS Palo Verde Research Station, park rangers and administration of Palo Verde National Park for their support; Rodolfo Amador for his help in designing the experimental disc; and Will Shim, Chad Smith, and two anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript. An EEB fellowship of the University of Texas at Austin, the Christiane and Christopher Tyson Fellowship awarded by the Organization for Tropical Studies, and NSF-DDIG award 1210412 to SAV financed this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Sabrina Amador-Vargas & Ulrich G. Mueller

  2. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panamá

    Sabrina Amador-Vargas

Authors
  1. Sabrina Amador-Vargas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulrich G. Mueller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina Amador-Vargas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Research was conducted under scientific permits 08-2012-SINAC and SE-PI-R-139-2013 from MINAET in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Costa Rica.

Additional information

Communicated by W. Hughes

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 479 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amador-Vargas, S., Mueller, U.G. Ability to reorient is weakly correlated with central-place versus non-central-place foraging in acacia ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2262-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2262-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation