Abstract
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as fluoxetine, within the aquatic environment may adversely affect the health and behavior of exposed organisms. Most studies on the effects of inadvertent pharmaceutical exposure focus on the individual level rather than examining behavior within a network of individuals. Within communication networks, interactants send signals to multiple individuals, potentially altering, and being altered by, the behavior of nearby individuals. To address if fluoxetine interferes with communication within a network, male Siamese fighting fish interacted under three audience types (male, female, or no audience) and two exposure conditions (control, fluoxetine). In the control group, findings were similar to prior studies, with males altering gill flaring rate depending on the sex of the audience present. In the exposed group, gill flaring did not differ based on audience type and was lower overall compared to the control, suggesting a reduction in aggression. In contrast, both unexposed and exposed males performed more tail beats when a female audience was present, suggesting that fluoxetine has a context-specific effect on behavior. Behavioral changes during current interactions may affect behavior during later interactions as well as the outcome of future encounters with audience individuals. The influence of fluoxetine on total behavior within an interaction and loss of audience effect suggests it may generate broader changes in communication beyond the exposed individual, causing fitness consequences. This study stresses the importance of studying the effects of inadvertent pharmaceutical exposure on behavior in multiple social contexts to better understand its impacts on complex communication systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold KE, Boxall ABA, Brown AR, Cuthbert RJ, Gaw S, Hutchinson TH, Jobling S, Madden JC, Metcalfe CD, Naidoo V, Shore RF, Smits JE, Taggart MA, Thompson HM (2013) Assessing the exposure risk and impacts of pharmaceuticals in the environment on individuals and ecosystems. Biol Lett 9:20130492
Arnold KE, Brown AR, Ankley GT, Sumpter JP (2014) Medicating the environment: assessing risks of pharmaceuticals to wildlife and ecosystems. Philos Trans R Soc B 369:20130569
Barry MJ (2013) Effects of fluoxetine on the swimming and behavioral responses of the Arabian killifish. Ecotoxicology 22:425–532
Bertucci F, Matos RJ, Dabelsteen T (2013) Knowing your audience affects male-male interactions in Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens). Anim Cogn 17:229–236
Bossus MC, Guler YZ, Short SJ, Morrison ER, Ford AT (2014) Behavioral and transcriptional changes in the amphipod Echinogammarus marinus exposed to two antidepressants, fluoxetine and sertraline. Aquat Toxicol 151:46–56
Brodin T, Piovano S, Fick J, Klaminder J, Heynen M, Jonsson M (2014) Ecological effects of pharmaceuticals in aquatic systems—impacts through behavioral alterations. Philos Trans R Soc B 369:20130580
Brooks BW (2014) Fish on Prozac (and Zoloft): ten years later. Aquat Toxicol 151:61–67
Clotfelter ED, McNitt MM, Carpenter RE, Summers CH (2010) Modulation of monoamine neurotransmitters in fighting fish Betta splendens exposed to waterborne phytoestrogens. Fish Physiol Biochem 36:933–943
Clotfelter ED, O’Hare EP, McNitt MH, Carpenter RE, Summers CH (2007) Serotonin decreases aggression via 5-HT1A receptors in the fighting fish, Betta splendens. Pharm Biochem Behav 87:222–231
Clotfelter ED, Rodriguez AC (2006) Behavioral changes in fish exposed to phytoestrogens. Environ Pollut 144:833–839
Dabelsteen T (2005) Public, private or anonymous? Facilitating and countering eavesdropping. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 38–62
Di Poi C, Bidel F, Dickel L, Bellanger C (2014) Cryptic and biochemical responses of young cuttlefish Sepia officinalis exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of fluoxetine. Aquat Toxicol 151:36–45
Doutrelant C, McGregor PK, Oliveira RF (2001) The effect of an audience on intrasexual communication in male Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens. Behav Ecol 12:283–286
Dubois F, Belzile A (2012) Audience effect alters male mating preferences in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). PLoS ONE 7:e43697
Dzieweczynski TL, Earley RL, Green TM, Rowland WJ (2005) Audience effect is context dependent in Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens. Behav Ecol 16:1025–1030
Dzieweczynski TL, Hebert OL (2012) Fluoxetine alters behavioral consistency of aggression and courtship in male Siamese fighting fish. Physiol Behav 107:92–97
Dzieweczynski TL, Hebert OL (2013) The effects of short-term exposure to an endocrine disrupter on behavioral consistency in juvenile and adult male Siamese fighting fish. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 64:316–326
Dzieweczynski TL, Mannion KL, Greaney NE (2014) Audience effect on female-female interactions in Siamese fighting fish. Ethology 120:855–862
Dzieweczynski TL, Russell AM, Forrette LM, Mannion KL (2013) Male behavioural type affects female preference in Siamese fighting fish. Behav Ecol 25:136–141
Dzieweczynski TL, Walsh MM (2010) Audience type and receptivity affect male-female interactions in Siamese fighting fish. Ethology 116:10–18
Earley RL, Dugatkin LA (2002) Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:943–952
Elipot Y, Hinaux H, Callebert J, Rétaux S (2013) Evolutionary shift from fighting to foraging in blind cavefish through changes in the serotonin network. Curr Biol 23:1–10
Gardner M, Comber S, Scrimshaw MD, Cartmell E, Lester J, Ellor B (2012) The significance of hazardous chemicals in wastewater treatment works effluents. Sci Total Environ 437:363–372
Gaworecki KM, Klaine SJ (2008) Behavioral and biochemical responses of hybrid striped bass during and after fluoxetine exposure. Aquat Toxicol 88:207–213
Gunnarsson L, Jauhiainen A, Kristiansson E, Nerman O, Larsson DGJ (2008) Evolutionary conservation of human drug targets in organisms used for environmental risk assessments. Environ Sci Technol 42:5807–5813
Invernizzi R, Bramante M, Samanin R (1996) Role of 5-HT1A receptors in the effects of acute and chronic fluoxetine on extracellular serotonin in the frontal cortex. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 54:143–147
Johnson AC, Sumpter JP (2014) Putting pharmaceuticals into the wider context of challenges to fish populations in rivers. Philos Trans R Soc B 369:20130581
Kania BF, Gralak MA, Wielgosz M (2012) Four-week fluoxetine (SSRI) exposure diminishes aggressive behaviour of male Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens). J Behav Brain Sci 2:185–190
Kohlert JG, Mangan BP, Kodra C, Drako L, Long E, Simpson H (2012) Decreased aggressive and locomotor behaviours in Betta splendens after exposure to fluoxetine. Psychol Rep 110:51–62
Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LB, Buxton HT (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999--2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Tech 36:1202--1211
Kreke N, Dietrich DR (2008) Physiological endpoints for potential SSRI interactions in fish. Crit Rev Toxicol 38:215–247
Lillesaar C (2011) Serotonergic system in fish. J Chem Neuroanat 41:294–308
Lynn SE, Egar JM, Walker BG, Sperry TS, Ramenofsky M (2007) Fish on Prozac: a simple, noninvasive physiology laboratory investigating the mechanisms of aggressive behaviour in Betta splendens. Adv Physiol Educ 31:353–363
Matessi G, Matos RJ, Peake TM, McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T (2010) Effects of social environment and personality on communication in male Siamese fighting fish in an artificial network. Anim Behav 79:43–49
Matos RJ, McGregor PK (2002) The effect of the sex of an audience on male-male displays of Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens). Behaviour 139:1211–1221
Matos RJ, Schlupp I (2005) Performing in front of an audience: signalers and the social environment. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 63–83
McGregor PK, Peake TM (2000) Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signaling behavior. Acta Ethol 2:71–81
McGregor P (2005) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mennigen JA, Stroud P, Zamora JM, Moon TW, Trudeau VL (2011) Pharmaceuticals as neuroendocrine disruptors: lessons learned from fish. J Toxicol Environ Health B 14:387–412
Oliveira RF, McGregor PK, Latruffe C (1998) Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1045–1049
Ophir A, Galef BG (2003) Female Japanese quail that “eavesdrop” on fighting males prefer losers to winners. Anim Behav 66:399–407
Plath M, Kromuszczynski K, Tiedemann R (2008) Audience effect alters male but not female mating preferences. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:381–399
Rand-Weaver M, Margiotta-Casaluci L, Patel A, Panter GH, Owen SF, Sumpter JP (2013) The read-across hypothesis and environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. Environ Sci Technol 47:12297–12304
Sebastine IM, Wakeman RJ (2003) Consumption and environmental hazards of pharmaceutical substances in the UK. Process Saf Environ Prot 81:229–235
Shenoy K, Crowley PH (2011) Endocrine disruption of male mating signals: ecological and evolutionary implications. Funct Biol 25:433–448
Simpson MJA (1968) The display of the Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens. Anim Behav Monogr 1:1–73
Snekser JL, McRobert SP, Clotfelter ED (2006) Social partner preferences of male and female fighting fish (Betta splendens). Behav Process 72:38–41
Stevenson LM, Brown AC, Montgomery TM, Clotfelter ED (2011) Reproductive consequences of exposure to waterborne phytoestrogens in male fighting fish, Betta splendens. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 60:501–510
Summers CH, Korzan WJ, Watt MJ, Forster GL, Øverli Ø, Höglund E, Larson ET, Ronan PJ, Matter JM, Summers TR, Renner KJ, Greenberg N (2005) Does serotonin influence aggression? Comparing regional activity before and during social interaction. Physiol Biochem Zool 78:679–694
Sumpter JP, Donnachi RL, Johnson AC (2014) The appartently very variable potency of the anti-depressant fluoxetine. Aquat Toxicol 151:57–60
Townsend SW, Zuberbühler K (2009) Audience effects in chimpanzee copulation calls. Commun Integr Biol 2:282–284
Wang Y, Takai R, Yoshioka H, Shirabe K (2006) Characterization and expression of serotonin transporter genes in zebrafish. Tohoku J Exp Med 208:267–274
Weinberger J III, Klaper R (2014) Environmental concentrations of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine impact specific behaviours involved in reproduction, feeding and predator avoidance in the fish Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow). Aquat Toxicol 151:77–83
Winder VL, Pennington PL, Hurd MW, Wirth EF (2012) Fluoxetine effects on sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus) locomotor activity. J Environ Sci Health B 47:51–58
Zaccaroni M, Binazzi R, Massolo A, Dessi-Fulgheri F (2013) Audience effect on aerial alarm calls in the monogamous red-legged partridge. Ethol Ecol Evol 25:366–376
Zuberbühler K (2008) Audience effects. Curr Biol 18:R189–R190
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Amy Keirstead for analyzing water samples to determine EE2 concentration. Brennah Campbell, Sydney Farrin, Jessica Kane, Haley Lamonica, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was funded by a UNE OSP grant to TLD.
Compliance with ethical standards
This experiment was approved by the University of New England’s IACUC committee and is covered by protocol UNE-20130910DZIET.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of New England where this work was conducted and covered under protocol UNE-20130910DZIET.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Pilastro
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greaney, N.E., Mannion, K.L. & Dzieweczynski, T.L. Signaling on Prozac: altered audience effects on male-male interactions after fluoxetine exposure in Siamese fighting fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69, 1925–1932 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2005-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2005-y