Skip to main content
Log in

Biased social transmission in Drosophila oviposition choice

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within a group, animals adjust individual decisions to environmental conditions both through their own experience and by interacting with other animals. How individuals balance social vs. personal information may have a deep impact on their fitness, and this might be particularly relevant when individuals interact with conspecifics that carry different, or even conflicting, information. In animals, conformist strategy of social learning, defined by the tendency of individuals to disproportionately adopt the most commonly encountered social information, appears to be more widespread than previously thought. Here, we investigated whether females of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, conform their oviposition site choice to social cues coming from conspecifics. Groups of naïve “observer” flies were exposed to two oviposition media (banana or strawberry flavored) and to other “demonstrator” flies that were previously trained to prefer one of the two media. All flies were then tested for their oviposition preference. The preference of observer flies was highly sensitive to the social composition of the demonstrator group, and even the presence of a small proportion of individuals trained to oviposit on banana was enough to induce a biased preference for the banana medium. Our results suggest that D. melanogaster females combine their personal preference with social information to choose oviposition sites rather than showing social conformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battesti M, Moreno C, Joly D, Mery F (2012) Spread of social information and dynamics of social transmission within Drosophila groups. Curr Biol 22(4):309–313. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1988) An evolutionary model of social learning: the effects of spatial and temporal variation. In: Zentall TR, Galef BG (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou L-S, Richerson PJ (1992) Multiple models in social transmission of food selection by Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus. Anim Behav 44(Part 2 (0)):337–343. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(92)90039-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP, Chen GK (1988) Genetic and environmental variation in oviposition behaviour in the mycophagous Drosophila suboccidentalis Spcr. Funct Ecol 2(4):521–528. doi:10.2307/2389395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. Wiley

  • Fogleman JC (1979) Oviposition site preference for substrate-temperature in Drosophila-melanogaster. Behav Genet 9(5):407–412. doi:10.1007/bf01066978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grüter C, Segers FH, Ratnieks FL (2013) Social learning strategies in honeybee foragers: do the costs of using private information affect the use of social information? Anim Behav 85(6):1443–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haun DBM, van Leeuwen EJC, Edelson MG (2013) Majority influence in children and other animals. Dev Cog Neurosci 3:61–71. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2012.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R (1998) The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evol Hum Behav 19(4):215–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann AA (1985) Effects of experience on oviposition and attraction in Drosophila—comparing apples and oranges. Am Nat 126(1):41–51. doi:10.1086/284394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J (1982) Environmental modification of oviposition behavior in Drosophila. Am Nat 119(6):784–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph RM, Devineni AV, King IFG, Heberlein U (2009) Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(27):11352–11357. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901419106

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal RL (2004) The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict. Behav Ecol 15(2):269–277. doi:10.1093/beheco/arh008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal R, Coolen I, Laland K (2009) Adaptive trade-offs in the use of social and personnal information. In: Dukas R, Ratcliffe JM (eds) Cognitive ecology II. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 249–272

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN (2004) Social learning strategies. Learn Behav 32(1):4–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater E, Florent C (2014) Foraging bumblebees do not rate social information above personal experience. Behav Ecol Sociobiol:1–6. doi:10.1007/s00265-014-1725-8

  • Mery F, Kawecki TJ (2002) Experimental evolution of learning ability in fruit flies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(22):14274–14279

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molleman L, Pen I, Weissing FJ (2013) Effects of conformism on the cultural evolution of social behaviour. PLoS One 8(7):e68153. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068153

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peña J, Volken H, Pestelacci E, Tomassini M (2009) Conformity hinders the evolution of cooperation on scale-free networks. Phys Rev E 80(1):016110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike TW, Laland KN (2010) Conformist learning in nine-spined sticklebacks’ foraging decisions. Biol Lett 6(4):466–468. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.1014

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Possidente B, Mustafa M, Collins L (1999) Quantitative genetic variation for oviposition preference with respect to phenylthiocarbamide in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet 29(3):193–198. doi:10.1023/a:1021696019426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rendell L, Boyd R, Cownden D, Enquist M, Eriksson K, Feldman MW, Fogarty L, Ghirlanda S, Lillicrap T, Laland KN (2010) Why copy others? Insights from the social learning strategies tournament. Science 328(5975):208–213. doi:10.1126/science.1184719

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarin S, Dukas R (2009) Social learning about egg-laying substrates in fruitflies. Proc R Soc B 276(1677):4323–4328. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1294

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stienessen SC, Parrish JK (2013) The effect of disparate information on individual fish movements and emergent group behavior. Behav Ecol 24(5):1150–1160. doi:10.1093/beheco/art042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Waal E, Borgeaud C, Whiten A (2013) Potent social learning and conformity shape a wild primate’s foraging decisions. Science 340(6131):483–485. doi:10.1126/science.1232769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Delden W, Kamping A (1990) Genetic variation for oviposition behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Oviposition preferences and differential survival. Behav Genet 20(5):661–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang CH, Belawat P, Hafen E, Jan LY, Jan YN (2008) Drosophila egg-laying site selection as a system to study simple decision-making processes. Science 319(5870):1679–1683

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Teseo for useful comments on the manuscript and S. Wardrop for manuscript corrections. This work was supported by an ANR grant to F.M. (ANR-12-BSV7-0013-01) and the French Ministry of Research and Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederic Mery.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Giurfa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Battesti, M., Moreno, C., Joly, D. et al. Biased social transmission in Drosophila oviposition choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69, 83–87 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1820-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1820-x

Keywords

Navigation