Skip to main content
Log in

Cryptic prey colouration increases search time in brown trout (Salmo trutta): effects of learning and body size

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about how cryptic colouration influences prey search in near-surface aquatic habitats, although such knowledge is critical for understanding the adaptive value of colour crypsis as well as the perceptive constraints influencing foraging behaviour in these environments. This study had two main aims: (1) to investigate how background colour matching by prey affects foraging efficiency by brown trout parr and (2) to investigate how foraging ability on cryptic and conspicuous prey is affected by fish size at age (reflecting dominance). We addressed these questions by training wild brown trout parr to forage individually on live brown-coloured maggots on a cryptic (brown) or conspicuous (green) background. A separate experiment confirmed the absence of trout preference for brown or green substrate. The results show that prey background colour matching increases search time in brown trout. Search time generally decreased by learning, but conspicuous prey remained an easier prey to find throughout the six training trials. Thus, perceptive constraints appear to limit search efficiency for cryptic prey, suggesting that cryptic colouration can confer survival benefits to prey in natural environments. Smaller fish generally found conspicuous prey faster than larger individuals, whereas search time for cryptic prey was not influenced by body size. This suggests that smaller individuals compensate for inferior competitive ability by increasing foraging activity rather than improving cognitive ability. The technique of varying cognitive demands in behavioural tasks could be used more in future studies aimed at distinguishing motivational effects from cognitive explanations for variation in behavioural performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bond AB, Kamil AC (2006) Spatial heterogeneity, predator cognition, and the evolution of color polymorphism in virtual prey. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:3214–3219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowmaker JK (1995) The visual pigments of fish. Prog Ret Eye Res 15:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowmaker JK, Kunz YW (1987) Ultraviolet receptors, tetrachromatic color-vision and retinal mosaics in the brown trout (Salmo trutta)—age-dependent changes. Vis Res 27:2101–2108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridcut EE, Giller PS (1995) Diet variability and foraging strategies in brown trout (Salmo trutta): an analysis from subpopulations to individuals. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:2543–2552

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull CD, Metcalfe NB, Mangel M (1996) Seasonal matching of foraging to anticipated energy requirements in anorexic juvenile salmon. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao C-C, Hanlon RT (2001) Cuttlefish camouflage: visual perception of size, contrast and number of white squares in artificial checkerboard substrata initiates disruptive coloration. J Exp Biol 204:2119–2125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JM, Allen JA (1994) Selection by wild birds on artificial dimorphic prey on varied backgrounds. Biol J Linn Soc 51:433–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Croy MI, Hughes RN (1991) The influence of hunger on feeding behaviour and on the acquisition of learned foraging skills in the fifteenspine stickleback, Spinachia spinachia L. Anim Behav 41:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Billy VD, Usseglio-Polatera P (2002) Traits of brown trout prey in relation to habitat characteristics and benthic invertebrate communities. J Fish Biol 60:687–714

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laet JF (1985) Dominance and anti-predator behaviour of great tits Parus major: a field study. Ibis 127:372–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM, Fraser AHG (1984) Risk of predation and the feeding behaviour of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutsch). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukas R, Ellner S (1993) Information processing and prey detection. Ecology 74:1337–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals: a survey of anti-predator defences. Longman, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (1976) Body composition of brown trout (Salmo trutta L) in relation to temperature and ration size. J Anim Ecol 45:273–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1988) Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration. Phil Trans Soc Lond B 319:505–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (1994) Quantitative ecology and the brown trout. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L (2005) The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim Behav 70:967–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD (1984) Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Can J Zool 62:441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltmate BW, Williams DD (1989) A test of crypsis and predator avoidance in the stonefly Paragnetina media (Plecoptera, Perlidae). Anim Behav 37:992–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendron RP, Staddon JER (1983) Searching for cryptic prey: the effect of search rate. Am Nat 121:172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill FB, Wolf LL (1975) Economics of feeding territoriality in the golden-winged sunbird. Ecology 56:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höjesjö J, Johnsson JI, Bohlin T (2002) Can laboratory studies on dominance predict fitness of young brown trout in the wild. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes RN, Croy MJ (1993) An experimental analysis of frequency-dependent predation (switching) in the 15-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia. J Anim Ecol 62:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins TM (1969) Social structure position choice and microdistribution of two trout species (Salmo trutta and Salmo gairdneri) resident in mountain streams. Anim Behav Monogr 2:57–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson K, Ekendahl A (2002) Selective predation favouring cryptic individuals of marine snails (Littorina). Biol J Linn Soc 76:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen S, Sosik HM (2003) Cryptic coloration and mirrored sides as camouflage strategies in near-surface pelagic habitats: implications for foraging and predator avoidance. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1277–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson JI (1993) Big and brave: selection affects foraging under risk of predation in juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Anim Behav 45:1219–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson JI, Bohlin T (2006) The cost of catching up: increased winter mortality following structural growth compensation in the wild. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1281–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson JI, Nöbbelin F, Bohlin T (1999) Territorial competition among wild brown trout fry: effects of ownership and body size. J Fish Biol 54:469–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson JI, Jönsson E, Petersson E, Järvi T, Björnsson BT (2000) Fitness-related effects of growth investment in brown trout under field and hatchery conditions. J Fish Biol 57:326–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson JI, Winberg S, Sloman KA (2006) Social interactions. In: Sloman K, Wilson R, Balshine S (eds) Behaviour and physiology of fish, fish physiology, vol. 24. Academic, London, pp 151–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg H (1958) Observations in a stream tank of territoriality and competition in juvenile salmon and trout (Salmo salar L. and S. trutta L.). Rept Inst Freshwater Res Drottningholm 39:55–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Reader SM (1999) Foraging innovation is inversely related to competitive ability in male but not in female guppies. Behav Ecol 10:270–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Mänd T, Tammaru T, Mappes J (2007) Size dependent predation risk in cryptic and conspicuous insects. Evol Ecol 21:485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NJ (2000) Communication and camouflage with the same ‘bright’ colours in reef fishes. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 355:1243–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur MM, Beauchamp DA (2003) A comparison of visual prey detection among species of piscivorous salmonids: effects of light and low turbidities. Env Biol Fish 67:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merilaita S, Lyytinen A, Mappes J (2001) Selection for cryptic coloration in a visually heterogeneous habitat. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1925–1929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Avery S, Smyth MEB (1975) Switching in predatory fish. Ecology 56:1094–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaisted KC, Mackintosh NJ (1995) Visual search for cryptic stimuli in pigeons: implications for the search image and search rate hypothesis. Anim Behav 50:1219–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riipi M, Alatalo RV, Lindström L, Mappes J (2001) Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations. Nature 413:512–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodd FH, Hughes KA, Grether GF, Baril C (2002) A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:475–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Sherrat TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack—the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals & mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundström LF, Petersson E, Höjesjö J, Johnsson JI, Järvi T (2004) Hatchery selection promotes boldness in newly hatched brown trout (Salmo trutta): implications for dominance. Behav Ecol 15:192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney BW, Vannote RL (1982) Population synchrony in mayflies: a predator satiation hypothesis. Evolution 36:810–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen L (1960) The natural control of insects in pinewoods. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Arch Neerland Zool 13:265–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorobyev M, Marshall J, Osorio D, de Ibarra NH, Menzel R (2001) Colourful objects through animal eyes. Color Res Appl 26:S214–S217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

JIJ was financed by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas). We thank Sami Merilaita and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on this paper. The experiments comply with the current laws in Sweden and were approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Research in Gothenburg (Dnr: 199/2002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörgen I. Johnsson.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Bakker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnsson, J.I., Kjällman-Eriksson, K. Cryptic prey colouration increases search time in brown trout (Salmo trutta): effects of learning and body size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 1613–1620 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0590-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0590-8

Keywords

Navigation