Skip to main content
Log in

Worker policing and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica fusca

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A conflict over male production arises in social insects where workers are able to lay unfertilized male eggs. This happens because each female (queen or worker) is most closely related to her own sons and is thus predicted to reproduce. The conflict is modulated by worker policing where workers prevent each other from reproducing by aggression or egg cannibalism. In this study, we show that in the ant Formica fusca, worker policing occurs by egg cannibalism rather than by overt aggression among workers. Furthermore, we show that, contrary to bees, wasps and other ant species, egg discrimination in F. fusca is not based only on a universal queen signature chemical and that nest mate recognition of eggs occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2003) Power over reproduction in social Hymenoptera. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1741–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman M, Komdeur J, Ratnieks FLW (2003) Reproductive conflicts in social animals: who has power? Trends Ecol Evol 18:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Nielsen J, Sundström L, Oldham NJ, Petersen HC, Morgan ED (2003) Kin-assessment without kin discrimination in social insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8799–8804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulay R, Hefetz A, Soroker V, Lenoir A (2001) Camponotus fellah colony integration: worker individuality necessitates frequent hydrocarbon exchanges. Anim Behav 59:1127–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulay R, Katzav-Gozansky T, Vandermeer RK, Hefezt A (2003) Colony insularity through queen control on worker social motivation in ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG (1988) Worker reproduction in the higher eusocial Hymenoptera. Q Rev Biol 63:291–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A (1986) Evolution of social parasitism in ants. Trends Ecol Evol 1:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood C (1979) The Formicidae (Hymenoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomol Scand 8:1–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier R, Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of social insect colonies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Czechowski W, Radchenko A, Czechowska W (2002) The ants of Poland. Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS, Warsaw

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ettorre P, Mondy N, Lenoir A, Errard C (2002) Blending in with the crowd: social parasites integrate into their host colonies using a flexible chemical signature. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1911–1918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ettorre P, Heinze J, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Worker policing by egg eating in the ponerine ant Pachycondyla inversa. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1427–1434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler A, Liebig J, Schmitt T, Parker JE, Jones GR, Schreier P, Hölldobler B (2004) Surface hydrocarbons of queen eggs regulate worker reproduction in a social insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2945–2950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster KR (2004) Diminishing returns in social evolution: the not-so-tragic commons. J Evol Biol 17:1058–1072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster KR, Ratnieks FLW (2001) Paternity, reproduction and conflict in vespine wasps: a model system for testing kin selection predictions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA (1995) Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperation groups. Nature 377:520–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA (1996) Policing and group cohesion when resources vary. Anim Behav 52:1163–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA (1998) Foundations of social evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA (2003) Repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution 57:693–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Ireland B, Bourke AFG (1990) Conflicts, social economics and life history strategies in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gösswald K (1989) Die Waldameise. AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. J Theor Biol 7:1–16, 17–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hannonen M, Sundström L (2003) Worker nepotism among polygynous ants. Nature 42:921

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannonen M, Sledge MF, Turillazzi S, Sundström L (2002) Queen reproduction, chemical signalling and worker behaviour in polygyne colonies of the ant Formica fusca. Anim Behav 64:477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannonen M, Helanterä H, Sundström L (2004) Habitat age, breeding system and kinship in the ant Formica fusca. Mol Ecol 13:1579–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helanterä H (2004) Kinship and conflicts over male production in Formica ants. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki

  • Helanterä H, Sundström L (2005) Worker reproduction in the ant Formica fusca. J Evol Biol 18:162–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Härtel S, Neumann P, Raassen FS, Moritz RFA, Hepburn HR (2006) Social parasitism by Cape honeybee workers in colonies of their own subspecies (Apis mellifera capensis Esch.). Insectes Soc 53:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwanishi S, Hasegawa E, Ohkawara K (2003) Worker oviposition and policing behaviour in the myrmicine ant Aphaenogaster smythiesi japonica Forel. Anim Behav 66:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CA, Vander Meer RK, Lavine B (2001) Changes in the cuticular hydrocarbon patterns of the slave-maker queen, Polyergus breviceps after killing a Formica host queen. J Chem Ecol 27:1787–1804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller L (ed) (1999) Levels of selection in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolt PJ, Akre RD, Greene A (1977) Effects of colony division on Vespula atropilosa (Sladen) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 50:135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Moli F, Mori A (1986) The aggression test as a possible taxonomic tool in the Formica rufa group. Aggress Behav 12:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Moli F, Parmigiani S (1981) Laboratory and field observations of attack by the red wood ant Formica lugubris Zett on Formica cunicularia Latr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Aggress Behav 7:341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir A, Cuisset D, Hefetz A (2001) Effect of social isolation on hydrocarbon pattern and nestmate recognition in the ant Aphaenogaster senilis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Soc 48:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig J, Peeters C, Hölldobler B (1999) Worker policing limits the number of dominants in a ponerine ant. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1865–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig J, Peeters C, Oldham NJ, Markstädter C, Hölldobler B (2000) Are variations in cuticular hydrocarbons of queens and workers a reliable signal of fertility in the ant Harpegnathos saltator? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4124–4131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZB, Yamane S, Wang QC, Yamamoto H (2001) Nestmate recognition and temporal modulation in the patterns of cuticular hydrocarbons in natural colonies of Japanese carpenter ant Camponotus japonicus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J Ethol 16:57–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Vaamonde C, Koning JW, Brown RM, Jordan WC, Bourke AFG (2004) Social parasitism by male-producing reproductive workers in a eusocial insect. Nature 430:557–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin SJ, Beekman M, Wossler TC, Ratnieks FLW (2002) Parasitic Cape honeybee workers, Apis mellifera capensis, evade policing. Nature 415:163–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith J, Szathmary E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DG, Ratnieks FLW (2001) The timing of worker reproduction and breakdown of policing behaviour in queenless honey bee (Apis mellifera L) societies. Insectes Soc 48:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monnin T, Peeters C (1999) Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behav Ecol 10:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monnin T, Ratnieks FLW (2001) Policing in queenless ponerine ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirk CWW, Neumann P, Ratnieks FLW (2003) Cape honeybees, Apis mellifera capensis, police worker-laid eggs despite the absence of relatedness benefits. Behav Ecol 14:347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW (1988) Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. Am Nat 132:217–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW (1995) Evidence for a queen-produced egg-marking pheromone and its use in worker policing in the honey-bee. J Apic Res 34:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Visscher PK (1989) Worker policing in the honeybee. Nature 342:796–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Wenseleers T (2005) Policing in insect societies. Science 307:54–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T (2006) Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 51:581–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen R (1990) Colony success of the submissive ant Formica fusca within territories of the dominant Formica polyctena. Ecol Entomol 15:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundström L, Boomsma JJ (2001) Conflicts and alliances in insect families. Heredity 86:515–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haploidiploidy and the evolution of social insects. Science 191:249–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Meer RK, Alonso LE (2002) Queen primer pheromone affects conspecific fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) aggression. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vienne V, Errard C, Lenoir A (1998) Influence of the queen on worker behaviour in ants. Ethology 104:431–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visscher PK, Dukas R (1995) Honey bees recognize development of nestmates’ ovaries. Anim Behav 49:542–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenseleers T, Hart A, Helanterä H, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Worker reproduction and policing in insect societies: an ESS analysis. J Evol Biol 17:1035–1047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woyciechowski M, Lomnicki A (1987) Multiple mating of queens and the sterility of workers among eusocial Hymenoptera. J Theor Biol 128:317–327

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous referees of a previous version of the manuscript for constructive comments. The work was funded by The Academy of Finland (grants number 42725, 206505 and 213821), the Graduate School for Evolutionary Ecology and the Finnish Cultural Foundation. The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heikki Helanterä.

Additional information

Communicated by L. Keller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helanterä, H., Sundström, L. Worker policing and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica fusca . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 1143–1149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0327-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0327-5

Keywords

Navigation