Skip to main content
Log in

Resource distributions and diet development by trial-and-error learning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study interactions between resource distributions, grouping, and diet development in foragers who learn by trial-and-error. We do this by constructing an individual-based model where individuals move and forage in groups in a 2-D space with high resource diversity and learn what to eat. By comparing diet development in different resource distributions, and in gregarious and solitary individuals, we elucidate how these factors affect patterns of diet variation. Our results indicate that different resource distributions have profound effects on learning opportunities, and thereby lead to contrasting phenomena. In uniform environments, local resource depletion by gregarious individuals, in interaction with learning, leads to diet differentiation. In patchy environments, grouping leads to enhanced diet overlap within groups and leads to differences in diet between groups. Surprisingly, mixed environments can generate all these phenomena simultaneously. Our results predict relationships between diet variation, trial-and-error learning, and resource distributions. The phenomena we describe are not evolved strategies, but arise spontaneously when groups of individuals learn to forage in certain resource distributions. This suggests that describing diet specialization or diet homogenization as the result of behavioral strategies may not always be justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann SA (1998) Foraging for survival. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch LL (1999) Development of food preferences. Annu Rev Nutr 19:41–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • te Boekhorst I, Hogeweg P (1994) Self-structuring in artificial ‘CHIMPS’ offers new hypotheses for male grouping in chimpanzees. Behaviour 12:229–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Yang LH, Fordyce JA, Davis JM, Svanbäck R (2002) Measuring individual-level trophic specialization. Ecology 83:2936–2941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Svanback R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson R (1988) An evolutionary model of social learning: the effects of spatial and temporal variation. In: Zentall T, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Fedigan LM (1990) Dietary differences between neighboring Cebus capucinus groups: local traditions, food availability or responses to food profitability? Folia Primatol 54:177–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Wrangham R, Isabirye-Basuta G, Ben-David K (1997) Spatial and temporal variability in the structure of a tropical forest. Afr J Ecol 35:287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Gillespie TR (2002) Scale issues in the study of primate foraging: red colobus of Kibale National Park. Am J Phys Anthropol 117:349–363 DOI 10.1002/ajpa.10053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg JL, Goss S, Franks N, Pasteels JM (1989) The blind leading the blind: modelling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns. J Insect Behav 2:719–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan AJ, Young SA (2002) Can goats learn about foods through conditioned food aversions and preferences when multiple food options are simultaneously available? J Anim Sci 80:2091–2098

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen S, Oring L (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MW, Aoki K, Kumm J (1996) Individual versus social learning: evolutionary analysis in a fluctuating environment. Anthropol Sci 104:209–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragaszy DM, Visalberghi E (1996) Social learning in monkeys: primate “Primacy” reconsidered. In: Galef BG Jr, Heyes C (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic, New York, pp 65–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Galef BG (1988) Imitation in animals: history, definition, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In: Zentall T, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspecitives. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Galef BG, Giraldeau L-A (2001) Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Anim Behav 61:3–15 DOI 10.1006/anbe.2000.1557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia J, Hankins WG, Rusiniak KW (1974) Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat. Science 185:824–831

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa Y, Matsuzawa T (1981) Food-aversion conditioning in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): a dissociation of feeding in two separate situations. Behav Neural Biol 33:237–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk CK (2000) Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Anim Behav 59:1035–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes CM (1994) Social learning in animals: categories and mechanisms. Biol Rev 69:207–231

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton GE, Nowlan SJ (1987) How learning can guide evolution. Complex Syst 1:495–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogeweg P, Hesper B (1985) Socioinformatic processes: MIRROR modelling methodology. J Theor Biol 113:311–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasov WH, Diamond JM (1988) Interplay between physiology and ecology in digestion. BioScience 38:602–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball BA, Nolte D (2005) Herbivore experience with plant defense compounds influences acquisition of new flavor aversions. Appl Anim Behav Sci 91:17–34 DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuzawa T, Hasegawa Y (1983) Food aversion learning in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata). A strategy to avoid a noxious food. Folia Primatol 40:247–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mead R, Curnow RN, Hasted AM (1993) Statistical methods in agriculture and experimental biology, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Provenza FD (1995) Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J Range Manag 48:2–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers AR (1988) Does biology constrain culture? Am Anthropol 90:819–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. van der Post.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Alberts

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Post, D.J., Hogeweg, P. Resource distributions and diet development by trial-and-error learning. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 65–80 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0237-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0237-6

Keywords

Navigation