Skip to main content
Log in

The optimal balance of defence investment strategies in clonal colonies of social aphids

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social aphid species provide ideal systems to study the ecological influences upon the evolution of sociality because they consist of discrete colonies which are entirely clonal and therefore devoid of any genetic conflict over altruistic behaviour. Although selfishness can be discounted as an obstacle preventing the evolution of altruistic defenders, the vast majority of aphid species are not social. To examine the key life-history and ecological characteristics that interact to facilitate social evolution, we designed a matrix population model based on the natural history of one of the unique aphid species with soldiers, Pemphigus spyrothecae. In addressing the life-history factors, our special interest was to examine the optimal trade-off faced by colonies that can increase their defence investment by producing defenders at birth and/or increasing the duration of the defensive stage. The level and period of exposure to predation and a declining colony birth rate were key factors that selected for social defence. The model demonstrated that, in species which have soldiers that can facultatively develop to make a direct contribution to colony fitness, temporal extension of the soldier stage is a key mechanism of increasing defence investment. This extension is particularly favoured when predation is high and the lifetime of a colony is long. An increase in production of defenders at birth was favoured when mortality due to predation was strongly biased towards defenders. The model suggests that, in species which have the defensive flexibility of choosing whether soldiers remain as such, there is little requirement for flexibility in the morph allocations made at birth. All these predictions were found to be fully compatible with the available empirical data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akimoto S (1988) Competition and niche relationships among Eriosoma aphids occurring on the Japanese elm. Oecologia 75:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akimoto S (1992) Shift in life-history strategy from reproduction to defense with colony age in the galling aphid Hemipodaphis persimilis producing defensive first-instar larvae. Res Pop Ecol 34:359–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akimoto S (1996) Ecological factors promoting the evolution of colony defense in aphids: computer simulations. Insectes Soc 43:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki S (1977) Colophina clematis (Homoptera, Pemphigidae), an aphid species with ’soldiers’. Kontyû 45:276–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki S, Imai M (2005) Factors affecting the proportion of sterile soldiers in growing aphid colonies. Popul Ecol 47:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki S, Kurosu U (2003) Logistic model for soldier production in aphids. Insectes Soc 50:256–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Ratnieks FLW (1996) Paternity in eusocial hymenoptera. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 351:947–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braendle C (1999) The ecology of polyphenism in a soldier-producing aphid. M. Phil. Thesis. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss LW (1987) The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara K, Gadagkar R (1991) Behavioural castes, dominance and division of labour in a primitively eusocial wasp. Ethology 87:269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins MD, Ward SA, Dixon AFG (1981) Handling time and the functional response of Aphelinus thomsoni, a predator and parasite of the aphid, Drepanosiphum platanoides. J Anim Ecol 50:479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ (2001) The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms. Trends Ecol Evol 16:178–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz YP, Oelhaf RC Jr, Jockusch EL (1990) Polymorphic precocious larvae in the polyembryonic parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:549–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster WA (1990) Experimental evidence for effective and altruistic colony defence against natural predators by soldiers of the gall-forming aphid Pemphigus spyrothecae (Hemiptera: Pemphigidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster WA, Northcott PA (1994) Galls and the evolution of social behaviour in aphids. In: Williams MAJ (ed) Plant galls: organisms, interactions, populations. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 161–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster WA, Rhoden PK (1998) Soldiers effectively defend aphid colonies against predators in the field. Anim Behav 55:761–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, West SA, Buckling A (2004) Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature 430:1024–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann HR (1971) Sting autotomy, a defensive mechanism in certain social Hymenoptera. Insectes Soc 18:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard MT, Dixon AFG (1990) Forecasting of peak population density of the rose grain aphid Metopolophium dirhodum on wheat. Ann Appl Biol 117:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson KC, Whitham TG (1991) Manipulation of food resources by a gall-forming aphid: the physiology of sink-source interactions. Oecologia 88:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran NA (1993) Defenders in the North American aphid Pemphigus obesinymphae. Insectes Soc 40:391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry SP, McLeish MJ, Schwarz MP, Boyette AH, Zammit J, Chapman TW (2003) Variation in propensity to defend by reproductive gall morphs in two species of gall-forming thrips. Insectes Soc 50:54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike N (2002) Defence investment and altruism in Pemphigus aphids. Ph. D. Thesis. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge

  • Pike N, Foster WA (2004) Fortress repair in the social aphid species, Pemphigus spyrothecae. Anim Behav 67:909–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike N, Manica A (2006) The basis of cowardice in social defenders. Ecol Model 196:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike N, Braendle C, Foster WA (2004) Seasonal extension of the soldier instar as a route to increased defence investment in the social aphid Pemphigus spyrothecae. Ecol Entomol 29:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (2004) Kinship is relative. Nature 430:975–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoden PK (1997) The evolution of social behaviour in aphids of the genus Pemphigus. Ph. D. Thesis. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoden PK, Foster WA (2002) Soldier behaviour and division of labour in the aphid genus Pemphigus (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insectes Soc 49:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakata K, Itô Y, Yukawa J, Yamane S (1991) Ratio of sterile soldiers in the bamboo aphid, Pseudoregma bambucicola (Homoptera: Aphididae), colonies in relation to social and habitat conditions. Appl Entomol Zool 26:463–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Shingleton AW, Foster WA (2000) Ant tending influences soldier production in a social aphid. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1863–1868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DL, Foster WA (1996) The evolution of soldiers in aphids. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 71:27–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyerman JB, Roitberg BD (2004) Factors affecting soldier allocation in clonal aphids: a life-history model and test. Behav Ecol 15:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1976) Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Both authors contributed equally to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Pike.

Additional information

Communicated by N. Wedell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pike, N., Manica, A. The optimal balance of defence investment strategies in clonal colonies of social aphids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 803–814 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0224-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0224-y

Keywords

Navigation