Skip to main content
Log in

Do female bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) mate multiply to improve on previous mates?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrary to classical sexual selection theories, females of many taxa mate with multiple males during one reproductive cycle. In this study, we conducted an experiment on the “trade-up hypothesis”, which proposes that females remate if a subsequently encountered male is potentially superior to previous mates to maximize the genetic quality of their offspring. We presented bank vole females (Clethrionomys glareolus) sequentially with two males of known dominance rank in different orders, i.e., either first subordinate and second dominant, first dominant and second subordinate, or two males that were equal in dominance (high ranking) and observed their mating behavior. We found that 92% of the females mated multiply and did not base their remating decision on male social status. Therefore, polyandry cannot be explained by the “trade-up hypothesis” based on dominance rank in this species. However, we found that dominant males sired significantly more offspring than subordinate males. This varied according to mating order: dominant males sired more offspring when they were second than when they were first. Moreover, litter sizes were significantly smaller when the dominant male was first (smallest relative success of dominant males) compared to litter sizes when mating order was reversed or both males equal in status. Our results suggest that even though multimale mating includes males that are of poorer quality and thus potentially decreases the fitness of offspring, most of a female’s offspring are sired by dominant males. Whether this is due to cryptic female choice, sperm competition, or a combination of both, remains to be tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Gilson LN, Ferguson JWH (2001) Male size and sequential mate preference in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav 61:631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bujalska G (1990) Social system of the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus. In: Tamarin RH, Ostfeld RS, Pugh SR, Bujalska G (eds) Social systems and population cycles in voles. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Colegrave N, Kotiaho JS, Tomkins JL (2002) Mate choice or polyandry: reconciling genetic compatibility and good genes sexual selection. Evol Ecol Res 4:911–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffontaine V, Libois R, Kotlík P, Sommer R, Nieberding C, Paradis E, Searles JB, Michaux JR (2005) Beyond the Mediterranean peninsulas: evidence of central European glacial refugia for a temperate forest mammal species, the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Mol Ecol 14:1727–1739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119:601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1988) Copulatory-behaviour as courtship communication. Ethology 79:218–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabor CR, Halliday TR (1996) Sequential mate choice by multiply mating smooth newts: females become more choosy. Behav Ecol 8:162–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach G, Musolf K (2000) Fragmentation of landscape as a cause for genetic subdivision of bank vole populations. Conserv Biol 14:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg JR, Huck UW (1989) Sperm competition in mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 4:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gockel J, Harr B, Schlötterer C, Arnolds W, Gerlach G, Tautz D (1997) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Muridae) and Clethrionomys glareolus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Mol Ecol 6:597–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomendio M, Harcourt AH, Roldán ERS (1998) Sperm competition in mammals. In: Birkhead TR, Moller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, New York, pp 667–751

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice, vol 1. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 462

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer I (1982) Responses of female bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) to dominant vs subordinate conspecific males and to urine odors from dominant vs subordinate males. Behav Neural Biol 36:178–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horne TJ (1998) Evolution of female choice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Jyväskylä

  • Horne T, Ylönen H (1996) Female bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) prefer dominant males; but what if there is no choice? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:401–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne TJ, Ylönen H (1998) Heritabilities of dominance-releated traits in male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Evolution 52:894–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaarola M, Tegelström H, Fredga K (1999) Colonization history in Fennoscandian rodents. Biol J Linn Soc 68:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75:21–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruczek M (1997) Male rank and female choice in the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus. Behav Processes 40:171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan SR (1979) The copulatory pattern of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) and speculation on the role of penile spines. J Zool 188:279–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1990a) Sperm competition games: raffles and roles. Proc R Soc Lond B 242:120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1990b) Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations. Proc R Soc Lond B 242:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TE, Neff BD, Rodd HF, Rowe L (2003) Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1623–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A, Forsgren E (1998) Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol Evol 13:498–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratkiewicz M, Borkowska A (2000) Multiple paternity in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus): field and experimental data. Mamm Biol 65:6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CS, Gosling ML (2003) Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice. Nat Genet 35:103–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rozenfeld FM, Rasmont R (1991) Odour cue recognition by dominant male bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Anim Behav 41:839–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikes RS, Ylönen H (1998) Considerations of optimal litter size in mammals. Oikos 83:452–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer PBS, Horsup AB, Marsh HD (1998) Enhancement of reproductive success through mate choice in a social rock-wallaby, Petrogale assimilis (Macropodidae) as revealed by microsatellite markers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1987) The selection-arena hypothesis. In: Stearns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 337–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockley P (2003) Female multiple mating behaviour, early reproductive failure and litter size variation in mammals. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:271–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Heinemann, London, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ (1991) Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim Behav 41:343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO, Macdonald DW (2004) Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends Ecol Evol 19:127–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viitala J (1977) Social organization in cyclic subarctic populations of the voles Clethrionomys rufocanus (Sund.) and Microtus agrestis (L.). Ann Zool Fenn 14:53–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylönen H, Koskela E, Mappes T (1997) Infanticide in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus): occurrence and the effect of familiarity on female infanticide. Ann Zool Fenn 34:259–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylönen H, Horne TJ, Luukkonen M (2004) Effect of birth and weaning mass on growth, survival and reproduction in the bank vole. Evol Ecol Res 6:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1997) The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Elina Puolakka for the assistance with mating experiments and Henni Pietiläinen and Tuija Solismaa for the assistance with paternity analyses. Our department’s round table and John Loehr provided valuable comments on the manuscript. This study was financed by the Academy of Finland and a grant from the DAAD Foundation to I.K. The work described in this paper was conducted in accordance with current laws in Finland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ines Klemme.

Additional information

Communicated by Editorial Responsibility: K. Lindström

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klemme, I., Eccard, J.A. & Ylönen, H. Do female bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) mate multiply to improve on previous mates?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 415–421 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0181-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0181-5

Keywords

Navigation