Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differences in reproductive success between laboratory and wild-derived golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) as a consequence of inbreeding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All laboratory golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) originated from a sibling pairing back in 1930. Due to this extreme founder event, domestic golden hamsters are presumed to be one of the most bottlenecked animal populations. Nevertheless, domestic hamsters show no obvious signs of inbreeding depression in commonly used breeding stocks. To explore the existence of potentially masked inbreeding effects, we compared the reproductive success of laboratory (lab) and wild-derived (wild) golden hamsters. We allowed oestrus females to mate consecutively with lab and wild males. The resulting offspring was genotyped using microsatellites to assess paternity. Finally, we compared male reproductive success to genetic variability, sexual behaviour and different sperm characteristics. Both hamster strains exhibited the expected large difference in genetic diversity (H wild =0.712±0.062 vs H lab =0.007±0.007. The reproductive success of wild males dramatically exceeded that of lab males (87% of pups were sired by wild males). Sexual behaviour of wild and lab males only varied in the number of long intromissions (intromissions without ejaculation at the end of the mating). No significant differences were observed in relation to mounting, ejaculation and intromission. There were also no apparent differences in sperm motility, velocity and density or testis histology between wild and lab hamsters. We conclude that the reduced reproductive success of lab males represents a hidden inbreeding effect, although its precise physiological cause remains unclear. These results provide first evidence for a major fitness disadvantage in captive golden hamsters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arteaga M, Velazquez-Moctezuma J (2000) Temporal pattern of recovery from sexual satiety in male golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Physiol Behav 68:591–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer BA, Lacy RC, Foster ML, Alaks G (1990) Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice. J Hered 81:257–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell BN, Boland BD, Dewsbury DA (1976) Copulatory behaviour of golden hamster Mesocricetus auratus. Behaviour 61:180–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter CS, Schein MW (1971) Sexual receptivity and exhaustion in the female golden hamster. Horm Behav 2:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman T (2001) Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87:511–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman T, Davies SJ (2004) Functions and analysis of the seminal fluid proteins of male Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies. Peptides 25:1477–1490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csaikl F (1984) Electrophoretic comparison of Syrian and Chinese hamster species. Heredity 52:141–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deckard BS, Wilson JR, Schlesinger K (1989) Behavioral and reproductive differences in mice as a function of inbreeding. Behav Genet 19:433–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellegren H, Hartmann G, Johansson M, Andersson L (1993) Major histocompatibility complex monomorphism and low levels of DNA fingerprinting variability in a reintroduced and rapidly expanding population of beavers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8150–8153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH (1983) The place of management in conservation. In: Schoenwald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, McBryde B, Thomas WL (eds) Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH, Soule ME (1981) Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche P, Neumann K, Hollak H, Gattermann R (2000) Behaviour and genetic diversity of wild and lab golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Zoology 26:103(Suppl)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry CL, Wilkinson GS (2004) Sperm survival in female stalk-eyed flies depends on seminal fluid and meiotic drive. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 58:1622–1626

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattermann R, Fritzsche P, Neumann K, Al-Hussein I, Kayser A, Abiad M, Yakti R (2000) Notes on the current distribution and the ecology of wild golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). J Zool Lond 254:359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattermann R, Fritzsche P, Weinandy R, Neumann K (2002) Comparative studies of body mass, body measurements and organ weights of wild-derived and laboratory golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Lab Anim 36:445–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg JR, Huck UW (1989) Sperm competition in mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 4:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomendio M, Roldan ERS (1993) Mechanisms of sperm competition: linking physiology and behavioural ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8:95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomendio M, Harcourt AH, Roldan ERS (1998) Sperm competition in mammals. In: Birkhead TR, Moller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 667–756

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge JJ, Jones CG, Bruford MW, Nichols RA (2000) “Ghost” alleles of the Mauritius kestrel. Nature 403:616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Miller PS (1992) Conservation genetics: techniques and fundamentals. Ecol Appl 2:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland JL (1995) The black-tailed prairie dog. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck UW, Lisk RD (1985) Determinants of mating success in golden hamster: II. Pregnancy initiation. J Comp Psychol 99:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck UW, Quinn RP, Lisk RD (1985) Determinants of mating success in the golden hamster: IV. Sperm competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck UW, Lisk RD, Parente EJ, Principato DE (1986) Determinants of mating success in golden hamster: III. Female acceptance of multiple mating partners. J Comp Psychol 100:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RE (2003) Chemical communication in rodents: From pheromones to individual recognition. J Mammal 84:1141–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joron M, Brakefield PM (2003) Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424:191–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur JA, Kappe A, van de Zande L (1998) Influence of population isolation on genetic variation and demography in Seychelles warblers: a field experiment. Anim Conserv 1:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama S, Kamimura S (1999) Lowered sperm motility in subordinate social status of mice. Physiol Behav 65:665–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama S, Kamimura S (2003) Study on the development of sperm motility and social dominance of male mice. Physiol Behav 80:267–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krajnak K, Manzanares J, Lookingland KJ, Nunez AA (1994) Gender differences in tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic neuronal activity in a photoperiodic rodent (Mesocricetus auratus). Brain Res 634:159–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Barrowclough GF (1987) Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In: Soulé ME (ed) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen T, Stille B, Shine R (1996) Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders Vipera berus. Biol Conserv 75:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maecker HL (1993) Perinatal cocaine exposure inhibits the development of the male SDN. Dev Brain Res 76:288–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margulis SW, Walsh A (2002) The effects of inbreeding on testicular sperm concentration in Peromyscus polinotus. Reprod Fertil Dev 14:63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire KL, Duncan WR, Tucker PW (1985) Syrian hamster DNA shows limited polymorphism at class I-like loci. Immunogenetics 22:257–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher S, Penn DJ, Potts WK (2000) Male–male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3324–3329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller CR, Sessions GR (1972) Effects of prolonged intromission delays on the copulatory behavior of the male golden hamster. Psychon Sci 29:288–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton JB (1993) Theory and data pertinent to the relationship between heterozygosity and fitness. In: Thornhill NW (ed) The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 17–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer BL, Best KL, Blohm TR, Gates C, Goode RL, Hirsch KS, Laughlin ME, Petrow V, Smalstig EB, Stamm NB, Toomey RE, Hoover DM (1993) Ly207320 (6-Methylene-4-Pregnene-3,20-Dione) inhibits testosterone biosynthesis, androgen uptake, 5 alpha-Reductase, and produces prostatic regression in male rats. Prostate 23:181–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann K, Maak S, Stuermer IW, Lengerken G, Gattermann R (2001) Low microsatellite variation in laboratory gerbils. J Hered 92:71–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann K, Maak S, Fritzsche P, Gattermann R (2005) Microsatellites for diversity studies in the golden hamster. Mol Ecol Notes 5:876–878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien SJ, Roelke ME, Marker L, Newman A, Winkler CA, Meltzer D, Colly L, Evermann JF, Bush M, Wildt DE (1985) Genetic basis for species vulnerability in the cheetah. Science 227:1428–1434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oglesby JM, Lanier DL, Dewsbury DA (1981) The role of prolonged copulatory behavior in facilitating reproductive success in male Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) in a competitive mating situation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt NC, Lisk RD (1989) Effects of social stress during early pregnancy on litter size and sex ratio in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). J Reprod Fertil 87:763–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Lowe EH, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2003) Inbreeding and extinction. Effects of rate of inbreeding. Conserv Genet 4:405–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri IJ, Brakefield PM, Nichols RA (1996) Severe inbreeding depression and rapid fitness rebound in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Evolution 50:2000–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel HI (1985) Male Sexual Behavior. In: Siegel HI (ed) The hamster: reproduction and behavior. Plenum, New York, pp 191–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne RK, Lehman N, Girman D, Gogan PJP, Gilbert DA, Hansen K, Peterson RO, Seal US, Eisenhawker A, Mech LD, Krumenaker RJ (1991) Conservation genetics of the endangered Isle Royale gray wolf. Conserv Biol 5:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinert D, Fritzsche P, Gattermann R (2001) Activity Rhythms of wild and laboratory golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) under entrained and free-running conditions. Chronobiol Int 18:921–932

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Annett Poenicke for performing the sperm tests and the team of Dr. Michael Wilhelm from Mediquant, Halle, Germany for the assistance with the sperm velocity measures. We also thank Kerstin Waegner for her technical assistance and Samantha Larimer for being our English critic. We maintained animals and conducted all procedures in agreement with the Animal rights certificate (No. 203h-42502/2-514 MLU Hal1, granted by the federal state of Saxony-Anhalt, Germany).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Zoologie, Domplatz 4, 06108, Halle, Germany

    Peter Fritzsche, Karsten Neumann, Karsten Nasdal & Rolf Gattermann

Authors
  1. Peter Fritzsche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karsten Neumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karsten Nasdal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rolf Gattermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Fritzsche.

Additional information

Communicated by G. Wilkinson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fritzsche, P., Neumann, K., Nasdal, K. et al. Differences in reproductive success between laboratory and wild-derived golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) as a consequence of inbreeding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 220–226 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0159-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0159-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation