Skip to main content
Log in

Males are selective too: mating, but not courtship, with sequential females influences choosiness in male field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mate choice experiments have generally focused on female choice; few have considered that males can also be selective. We examined courtship in male field crickets sequentially introduced to four females of differing size. Large (L) and small (S) females were introduced in order of either LSLS or SLSL. We demonstrate that naive males invest equally (courtship effort) in the first female they meet, regardless of her size, but show greater courtship effort when they subsequently encounter large compared with small females. Moreover, we demonstrate that males show this discriminatory behavior when they are permitted to mate with females (i.e. use a spermatophore) but are less choosy when the female is removed before spermatophore transfer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker TCM, Milinski M (1991) Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW (1998) Mate choice for novel partners in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Ecol Entomol 23:473–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW (2000) Burrow residency, access to females and body size in male Scapsipedus meridianus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae; Gryllinae, Otte & Cade). J Orthoptera Res 9:27–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Ferguson JWH (2004) Male mate choice and spermatopore size in the Botswana armoured ground cricket Acanthoplus discoidalis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae; Hetrodinae). Can, and how, do males judge female mating history? J Zool (London) 262:305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Ferreira M, Ferguson JWH (2004) The influence of physical and acoustic experience on sequential mate preference in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Is song important? J Insect Behav 17:843–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Gilson LN, Ferguson JWH (2001a) Male size and sequential mate preference in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav 61:631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Gilson LN, Ferguson JWH (2001b) Mate guarding may compensate for constraints on ejaculate production in the cricket Gryllodes sigillatus. Ethology 107:1087–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76:305–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Langen TA (1996) How do animals choose their mates? Trends Ecol Evol 11:468–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall MD, Beck R, Greenwood M (2000) Detailed developmental morphology of the spermatophore of the Mediterranean field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Arthropod Struct Develop 29:23–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Smith MJ, Bentsen CL, Bussiere LF (2004) High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432:1024–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 72:283–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 20:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM (1979) Multivariate analysis. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M (2001) The economics of sequential mate choice in sticklebacks. In: Dugatkin LA (ed) Model systems in behavioral ecology: integrating conceptual, theoretical and empirical approaches. Princeton University Press, Princeton pp 245–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1992) Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 250:229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK, Morris GK, Snedden WA (1987) Mating and its effect on acoustic signaling behaviour in a primitive orthopteran, Cyphoderris strepitans (Haglidae): the cost of feeding females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1986) Female mate choice in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim Behav 34:1463–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1988) Male size, mating potential and lifetime reproductive success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim Behav 36:372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Ritchie MG (1996) Symmetry in the songs of crickets. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:1305–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Teale RJ, Maier M, Standish RJ, Bailey WJ, Withers PC (1992) Some costs of reproduction for male bushcrickets Requena verticalis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): allocating resources to mate attraction and nuptial feeding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachon G, Murray AM, Gray DA, Cade WH (1999) Agonistic displays and the benefits of fighting in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Insect Behav 12:533–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N (1997) Definitive evidence for cuticular pheromones in a cricket. Anim Behav 54:979–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vahed K (1998) The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 73:43–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong BBM, Jennions MD, Keogh JS (2004) Sequential male mate choice in a fish, the Pacific blue-eye Pseudomugil signifer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support came from the University of Pretoria. We thank three anonymous reviewers for useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip W. Bateman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bateman, P.W., Fleming, P.A. Males are selective too: mating, but not courtship, with sequential females influences choosiness in male field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59, 577–581 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0083-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0083-y

Keywords

Navigation