Skip to main content
Log in

Preferential incubation positions for different sized eggs and their influence on incubation period and hatching asynchrony in Snares crested (Eudyptes robustus) and yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In crested penguins (Eudyptes spp.), second-laid eggs typically hatch before first eggs. Amongst a variety of factors that have been considered as mechanisms underlying this reversal, has been the idea that crested penguins can adjust the degree of hatching asynchrony by manipulating egg positions (i.e. placing the smaller first egg in the supposedly thermally disadvantaged anterior position) during incubation (termed Preferential Incubation Hypothesis). We tested this in the Snares crested penguin (Eudyptes robustus) and the closely related, but synchronously-hatching, yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes). Snares crested penguins were more likely to place their first eggs, which are smaller than second eggs, in the anterior incubation position than were yellow-eyed penguins, which have a clutch of two similar-sized eggs. But when yellow-eyed penguins, a non-brood reducing species, were provided with an artificial size-dimorphic clutch, they also placed smaller eggs more frequently in the anterior position, suggesting that a general preference exists among penguins to place smaller eggs in the anterior position. Egg temperatures of small first eggs of Snares crested penguins were higher in the anterior than in the posterior position. Large first eggs in lesser size-dimorphic clutches experienced high temperature differences in relation to position, while small first eggs in greater size-dimorphic clutches were incubated at similar temperatures. In yellow-eyed penguins, large eggs within clutches generally had higher egg temperatures than small eggs. Incubation periods of second eggs declined with increasing egg size. Egg-size variation, rather than egg positioning behaviour, influenced hatching patterns in Snares crested penguins. In lesser size-dimorphic clutches, second eggs were more likely to hatch first while in greater size-dimorphic clutches, small first eggs were more likely to hatch at the same time or before the second eggs. This was similar in yellow-eyed penguins, where second eggs hatched earlier in clutches with large first eggs. Our data contradicts the Preferential Incubation Hypothesis and we conclude that this hypothesis is unlikely to explain the reversed hatching asynchrony in crested penguins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ar A (1991) Roles of water in avian eggs. In: Deeming DC, Ferguson MWJ (eds) Egg incubation: its effects on embryonic development in birds and reptiles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 229–243

  • Boersma PD (1982) Why some birds take so long to hatch? Am Nat 120:733–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR (1988) Egg temperatures and embryonic metabolism of A- and B-eggs of macaroni and rockhopper penguins. S Afr Tydskr Dierk 23:166–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger AE, Williams AJ (1979) Egg temperatures of the rockhopper penguin and some other penguins. Auk 96:100–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark AB, Wilson DS (1981) Avian breeding adaptations: hatching asynchrony, brood reduction and nest failure. Q Rev Biol 56:253–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby JT, Seddon PJ (1990) Breeding biology of Yellow-eyed Penguins (Megadyptes antipodes). In: Davis LS, Darby JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 45–62

  • Davis LS, Renner M (2004) Penguins. Poyser, London

  • Drummond H, Chavelas CG (1989) Food shortage influences siblings aggression in the blue-footed booby. Anim Behav 37:806–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge K-A (1996) Parental investment in penguins. PhD Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

  • Farner DS (1958) Incubation and body temperatures in the yellow-eyed penguin. Auk 75:249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau CR (1982) Egg formation in Fiordland crested penguins (Eudyptes pachyrhynchus). Condor 84:172–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Heezik Y van, Davis LS (1990) Effects of food variability on growth rates, fledging sizes and reproductive success in Yellow-eyed Penguins (Megadyptes antipodes). Ibis 132:354–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussell DJT (1972) Factors affecting clutch size in arctic passerines. Ecol Monogr 42:317–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman SALM (1993) Dynamic energy budgets in biological systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Lack D (1947) The significance of clutch size. Ibis 89:302–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamey TC (1990) Hatch asynchrony and brood reduction in penguins. In: Davis LS, Darby JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 399–416

  • Magrath RD (1990) Hatching asynchrony in altricial birds. Biol Rev 65:587–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J, Carrascal LM, Sanz JJ, Amat JA, Cuervo JJ (1994) Hatching asynchrony, sibling hierachies and brood reduction in the chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica). Polar Biol 14:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Richdale LE (1957) A population study of penguins. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  • Ricklefs RE (1993) Sibling competition, hatching asynchrony, incubation period, and lifespan in altricial birds. In: Power DM (ed) Current ornithology, vol 11. Plenum, New York, pp 199–276

  • Seddon PJ (1989) Patterns of nest relief during incubation period variability in the yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes). NZ J Zool 16:393–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Sandvik J, Rofstad G, Lorentsen O, Husby M (1984) On the adaptive value of intraclutch egg-size variation in birds. Auk 101:685–697

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair CC (1992) Incubation behavior, brood patch formation and obligate brood reduction in Fiordland crested penguins. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:409–416

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair CC (1996) Multiple mechanisms of reversed hatching asynchronity in rockhopper penguins. J Anim Ecol 65:485–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoleson SH, Beissinger SR (1995) Hatching asynchrony and the onset of incubation in birds, revisited: when is the critical period? In: Power DM (ed) Current ornithology, vol 12. Plenum, New York, pp 191–270

  • Stonehouse B (1966) Egg volumes from linear dimensions. Emu 65:227–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Viñuela J (1997a) Adaptations vs. constraint: intraclutch egg-mass variation in birds. J Anim Ecol 66:781–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Viñuela J (1997b) Laying order affects incubation duration in the Black Kite (Milvus migrans): counteracting hatching asynchrony? Auk 114:192–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Warham J (1974a) The breeding biology of behaviour of the Snares crested penguin. J Roy Soc NZ 4:63–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Warham J (1974b) The Fiordland crested penguin. Ibis 116:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Warham J (1975) The crested penguins. In: Stonehouse B (ed) The biology of penguins. MacMillan, London, pp 189–269

  • Webb DR (1987) Thermal tolerance of avian embryos: a review. Condor 89:874–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams AJ (1981) The laying interval and incubation period of rockhopper and macaroni penguins. Ostrich 52:226–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams TD (1990) Growth and survival in macaroni penguin, Eudyptes chrysolophus, A- and B-chicks: do females maximise investment in the large B-egg? Oikos 59:349–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams TD, Croxall JP (1991) Chick growth and survival in gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua): effect of hatching asynchrony and variation in food supply. Polar Biol 11:197–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Alvin Setiawan, Mike Hazel, Sylviane Neumann, Danilo Hegg, Brad Robson, and Jasmine Lai for help in the field, and John Darby for providing helpful information about yellow-eyed penguins breeding at Boulder Beach. This study was approved by the Department of Conservation and the University of Otago Animal Ethics Committee and complies with the current laws of New Zealand. In particular, we thank Dean Nelson, Bruce McKinlay, Dave Houston, and Jeremy Karol from the Department of Conservation for support and permits. The study was supported by grants from the Yellow-eyed Penguin Trust, a University of Otago Postgraduate Scholarship to M.M. and an Otago Research Grant to L.S.D. Additionally, we thank Colleen Cassady St. Clair and Javier Viñuela, as reviewers, for the helpful comments they made on a previous draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie Massaro.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Brown

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massaro, M., Davis, L.S. Preferential incubation positions for different sized eggs and their influence on incubation period and hatching asynchrony in Snares crested (Eudyptes robustus) and yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56, 426–434 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0803-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0803-8

Keywords

Navigation