Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly require either fixation or joint sacrificing surgery; proximal femoral nail (PFN) and bipolar hemiarthroplasties (BPH) are the most common interventions. PFN is considered to be the ideal construct for these fractures; however, the usage of hemiarthroplasties to facilitate earlier mobilization has been on a rise. Currently there is no consensus on the superiority of one of these two techniques over the other and the present review was done to determine this.

Research question

Is PFN a better alternative to BPH for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly?

Objective

The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the superiority of PFN over BPH by comparing the primary outcomes like mortality, Harris Hip scores (HHS), complications, and re-operations. Additionally, secondary outcomes like blood loss, duration of surgery, and period of hospital stays were also compared.

Methodology

Three databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched for relevant articles that directly compared PFN and BPH in unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly.

Results

We analyzed a total of seven studies published between the years 2005 to 2017. There were four retrospective and three prospective randomized controlled studies. The number of patients in these studies ranged from 53 to 303.

Primary outcomes

There was a significant difference in HHS between two groups with standard mean difference of − 0.51 (range − 0.67 to −0.36), favouring the PFN group. The rate of mortality was higher in the BPH group with odds ratio of 2.07 (range 1.40–3.08). Implant-related complications like fractures and subsidence were more in BPH group but this was not significant.

Secondary outcomes

Mean surgical time (standard mean difference 2.19) and blood loss (3.75) were significantly less in the PFN group. The duration of hospital stay was also found to be significantly less in the PFN group (2.66).

Conclusion

Proximal femoral nails are superior to bipolar hemiarthroplasties for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. PFN imparts better functional outcomes and has lower rates of overall mortality. Additionally it is faster surgery, with lesser blood loss contributing to better results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dhanwal DK, Sahoo S, Gautam VK, Saha R (2013) Hip fracture patients in India have vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Osteoporos Int 24(2):553–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sankaran B (2000) Clinical studies: incidence of fracture neck of femur and intertrochanteric fractures in three Delhi hospitals. In: Sankaran B (ed) Osteoporosis. South East Asia Regional Office, World Health Organization, New Delhi, pp 9–18

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lips P (2001) Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev 22:477–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rainfray M, Dehail P, Salles N (2007) Complications of immobility and bed rest. Prevention and management. Rev Prat 57(6):671–676

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Voleti PB, Liu SY, Baldwin KD, Mehta S, Donegan DJ (2015) Intertrochanteric femur fracture stability: a surrogate for general health in elderly patients? Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 6(3):192–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koval KJ (2007) Intramedullary nailing of proximal femur fractures. Am J Orthop 36 (4 Suppl:4–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erturer RE, Sonmez MM, Sari S, Seckin MF, Kara A, Ozturk I (2012) Intramedullary osteosynthesis of instable intertrochanteric femur fractures with Profin nail in elderly patients. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 46(2):107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ballal MSG, Emms N, Ramakrishnan M, Thomas G (2008) Proximal femoral nail failures in extracapsular fractures of the hip. J Orthop Surg 16(2):146–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gotze B, Bonnaire F, Weise K, Friedl HP (1998) Belastbahrkeit von Osteosynthesen bei instabilen per-und subtrochanteren Femurfrakturen. Aktuelle Traumatoll 28:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszkowitz R (2003) The proximal femoral nail (PFN) – a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a followup of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand 74(1):53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan BY, Lau AC, Kwek EB (2015) Morphology and fixation pitfalls of a highly unstable intertrochanteric fracture variant. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 23(2):142–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kregor PJ, Obremskey WT, Kreder HJ, Swiontkowski MF (2014) Unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 28(Suppl 8):S25–S28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Temiz A, Durak A, Atici T (2015) Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in geriatric patients treated with the DLT trochanteric nail. Injury 46(Suppl 2):S 41–S 46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park MS, Cho HM, Kim JH, Shin WJ (2013) Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a rectangular cross-section stem for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Hip Int 23:316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimsrud C, Monzon RJ, Richman J, Ries MD (2005) Cemented hip arthroplasty with a novel cerclage cable technique for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Arthroplast 20:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh V, Bhakta P, Zietak E, Hussain A (2016) Bone cement implantation syndrome: a delayed postoperative presentation. J Clin Anesth 31:274–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim SY, Kim YG, Hwang JK (2005) Cementless calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2186–2192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Desteli EE, İmren Y, Erdoğan M, Aydagün Ö (2015) Quality of life following treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly. Clin Invest Med 38(2):E63–E72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Görmeli G, Korkmaz MF, Görmeli CA, Adanaş C, Karataş T, Şimşek SA (2015) Comparison of femur intertrochanteric fracture fixation with hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail systems. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 21(6):503–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Özkayın N, Okçu G, Aktuğlu K (2015) Intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly treated with either proximal femur nailing or hemiarthroplasty: a prospective randomised clinical study. Injury 46(Suppl 2):S3–S8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Park BJ, Cho HM, Min WB (2015) A comparison of internal fixation and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients. Hip Pelvis 7(3):152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang P, Hu F, Shen J, Zhang L, Zhang L (2012) Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: a study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 43(6):876–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Esen E, Dur H, Ataoğlu MB, Ayanoğlu T, Turanlı S (2017) Evaluation of proximal femoral nail-antirotation and cemented, bipolar hemiarthroplasty with calcar replacement in treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in terms of mortality and morbidity ratios. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 28(1):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindskog DM, Baumgaertner MR (2004) Unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khadgawat R, Brar KS, Gahlo M et al (2010) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Asian-Indian patients with fragility hip fracture: a pilot study. J Assoc Physicians India 58:539–542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(3):457–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. van Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Meylaerts SA, Roukema GR (2010) The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification. Injury 41(4):377–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gallagher CA, Jones CW, Kimmel L et al (2019) Osteoarthritis is associated with increased failure of proximal femoral fracture fixation. Int Orthop 43(5):1223–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mandeep Singh Dhillon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, P., Rajnish, R.K., Sharma, S. et al. Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 623–633 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04351-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04351-9

Keywords

Navigation