Skip to main content
Log in

Lesion size measurement in femoral head necrosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Management of patients with early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head remains controversial. Uniform use of an effective method of evaluation and classification, including both stage and lesion size, would allow for comparison and would significantly improve treatment of patients. There is no consensus on how best to determine lesion size. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare accuracy and ease of use of different techniques for determining the size of femoral head lesions.

Methods

Twenty-five hips with stages I or II osteonecrosis were evaluated with radiographs and MRI. 3-D MRI measurements of lesion size were used as the standard against which to compare visual estimates and angular measurements: necrotic angle of Kerboul, index of necrosis, and adjusted index of necrosis.

Results

3-D measurements (necrotic volume) showed regular progression from 2.2 to 59.2% of the femoral head. There was a rough correlation with angular measurements; index of necrosis was closer than the necrotic angle. Visual estimates from serial MRI images were as accurate as angular measurements.

Conclusions

Simple visual estimates of lesion size from serial MRI images are reasonably accurate and are satisfactory for clinical use. Angular measurements provide some indication of prognosis and treatment; however, they have limited accuracy, with considerable variability between techniques. 3-D MRI volumetric measurements are the most accurate. Using current techniques and software, they are easier to use, requiring similar time and effort to angular measurements. They should be considered for clinical research and publications when the most accurate measurements are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cherian SF, Laorr A, Saleh KJ et al (2003) Quantifying the extent of femoral head involvement is osteonecrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:309–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ha Y-C, Jung WH, Kim J-R, Seong NH, Kim S-Y, Koo K-H (2006) Prediction of collapse in femoral head osteonecrosis: a modified Kerboul method with use of magnetic resonance images. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Supplement 3):35–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hernigou P, Lambotte SC (2001) Volumetric analysis of osteonecrosis of the femur: anatomical correction using MRI. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 83-B:672–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holman AJ, Gardner GC, Richardson ML, Simkin PA (1995) Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging clinical outcome of core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Rheumatol 22:1929–1933

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerboul M, Thomine J, Postel M, Merle D’Aubigne R (1974) The conservative surgical treatment of idiopathic aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 56:291–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Koo K-H, Kim R (1995) Quantifying the extent of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a new method using MRI. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77:875–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mont MA, Jones LC, Hungerford DS (2006) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1117–1132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mont MA, Jones LC, Pacheo I, Hungerford DS (1998) Radiographic predictors of outcome of core decompression for osteonecrosis stage III. Clin Orthop 354:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mont MA, Marulanda GA, Jones LC, Saleh KJ, Gordon N, Hungerford DS, Steinberg ME (2006) Systematic analysis of classification systems for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg 88-A(Supplement 3):16–26

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steinberg DR, Steinberg ME (2014) The University of Pennsylvania classification of osteonecrosis. In: Koo K-H, Mont MA, Jones LC (eds) Osteonecrosis. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 201–206

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steinberg ME, Hayken GD, Steinberg DR (1995) A quantitative system for staging avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77:34–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Steinberg ME, Seong CO, Khoury V, Udupa JK, Steinberg DR (2016) Determining lesion size in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a practical approach. Formosan J Musculoskeletal Disorders 7:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Udupa JK, Odhner D, Hackney D, Moonis G (2005) A system for brain tumor volume estimation via MR imaging and fuzzy connectedness. Comput Med Imaging Graph 29:21–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moonis G, Liu JG, Udupa JK, Hackney DB (2002) Estimation of tumor volume with fuzzy connectedness segmentation of MR images. Am J Neuroradiol 23:356–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robb RA, Hanson DP (1995) The ANALYZE software system for visualization and analysis in surgery simulation. In: Lavallee S, Taylor RH, Burdea GS, Mosges R (eds) Computer integrated surgery: technology and clinical applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 175–190

    Google Scholar 

  16. Theodorou DJ, Malizos KN, Beris AE, Theodorou SJ, Soucacos PN (2001) Multimodal imaging quantitation of the lesion size in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Clin Orthop 386:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinberg ME, Bands RE, Parry S, Hoffman E, Chan T, Hartman KM (1999) Does lesion size affect the outcome in avascular necrosis? Clin Orthop 367:262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinberg DR, Steinberg ME, Garino JP, Dalinka M, Udupa JK (2006) Determining lesion size in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg 88-A(Supplement 3):27–34

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee GC, Steinberg ME (2012) Are we evaluating osteonecrosis adequately? Int Orthop 36:2433–2439

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinberg ME, Hayken GD, Steinberg DR (1984) A new method for evaluation and staging of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. In: Arlet J, Ficat RP, Hungerford DS (eds) Bone Circulation. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 398–403

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gardeniers JWM, ARCO Committee on Terminology and Staging (1993) The ARCO perspective for reaching one uniform staging system of osteonecrosis. In: Schoutens A, Arlet J, Gardeniers JWM, Huges SPF (eds) Bone circulation and vascularization in normal and pathological conditions. Plenum Press and NATO Scientific Affairs Division, New York and London, pp 375–380

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Gardeniers JWM (1991) A new proposition of terminology and an international classification of osteonecrosis. ARCO Newsletter 3:153–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Steinberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

These studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent was not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steinberg, M.E., Oh, S.C., Khoury, V. et al. Lesion size measurement in femoral head necrosis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 1585–1591 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3912-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3912-0

Keywords

Navigation