Skip to main content
Log in

Anteromedial cortical support reduction in unstable pertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of intra-operative fluoroscopy and post-operative three dimensional computerised tomography reconstruction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Anteromedial cortical support reduction is favourable for secondary stability after limited sliding in unstable pertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and agreement between intra-operative fluoroscopy and post-operative 3D reconstruction.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of 28 patients (mean 81.6 years) treated with short cephalomedullary nails was performed. All patients had full sets of intra-operative fluoroscopy and post-operative 3D CT images. Observation was focused on the position of the anteromedial cortices of the inferior corner between the head-neck fragment and femoral shaft, and their relationship was categorised into three types: positive, neutral and negative. The percentage of subsequent changes in cortical reduction quality between fluoroscopy and 3D CT was calculated and compared.

Results

There were 24 positive (85.7%), four neutral and no negative positions in the anteroposterior (AP) view and one positive, 20 neutral (71.4%) and seven negative positions in the lateral view from fluoroscopy. On post-operative 3D CT images with a full range of rotation, definitive anteromedial cortical contact (positive and neutral support) was observed in 18 cases (64.3%). Ten cases lost the anteromedial cortical buttress. With the posteromedial region of the lesser trochanter detached, a positive AP cortical position combined with a positive/neutral lateral position on fluoroscopy (17 cases) was highly predictive of reliable, definitive cortical support (15 cases, 88.2%) on 3D CT. A negative lateral position on fluoroscopy (seven cases), regardless of the combination in the AP view, was likely to predict the final loss of cortical support (six cases, 85.7%) on 3D CT; a positive/neutral lateral position (21 cases) was only associated with loss of support in four cases (19.1%) (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

A lateral negative position of the anterior cortex on fluoroscopy for unstable pertrochanteric fractures may be highly predictive of post-operative final loss of the anteromedial cortical buttress, which should be avoided during operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russell TA, Sanders R (2011) Pertrochanteric hip fractures: time for change. J Orthop Trauma 25(4):189–190. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f221c1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Niu E, Yang A, Harris AH, Bishop J (2015) Which fixation device is preferred for surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the United States? A survey of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(11):3647–3355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4469-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufer H (1980) Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 146:53–61

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Ma Z, Li Q, Dargel J, Eysel P (2015) Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(6):811–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2206-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Baldwin PC 3rd, Lavender RC, Sanders R, Koval KJ (2016) Controversies in Intramedullary fixation for Intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 30(12):635–641. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou JQ, Chang SM (2012) Failure of PFNA: helical blade perforation and tip-apex distance. Injury 43(7):1227–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang SM, Song DL, Ma Z, Tao YL, Chen WL, Zhang LZ, Wang X (2014) Mismatch of the short straight cephalomedullary nail (PFNA-II) with the anterior bow of the femur in an Asian population. J Orthop Trauma 28(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu SJ, Chang SM, Ma Z, Du SC, Xiong LP, Wang X (2016) PFNA-II protrusion over the greater trochanter in the Asian population used in proximal femoral fractures. Indian J Orthop 50(6):641–646. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.193475

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsang ST, Aitken SA, Golay SK, Silverwood RK, Biant LC (2014) When does hip fracture surgery fail? Injury 45(7):1059–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li S, Chang SM, Jin YM, Zhang YQ, Niu WX, Du SC, Zhang LZ, Ma H (2016) A mathematical simulation of the tip-apex distance and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for intertrochanteric fractures reduced with lag screws. Injury 47(6):1302–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li S, Chang SM, Niu WX, Ma H (2015) Comparison of tip apex distance and cut-out complications between helical blades and lag screws in intertrochanteric fractures among the elderly: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sci 20(6):1062–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0770-0

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ehrnthaller C, Olivier AC, Gebhard F, Dürselen L (2017) The role of lesser trochanter fragment in unstable pertrochanteric A2 proximal femur fractures - is refixation of the lesser trochanter worth the effort? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 42(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim GM, Nam KW, Seo KB, Lim C, Kim J, Park YG (2017) Wiring technique for lesser trochanter fixation in proximal IM nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: a modified candy-package wiring technique. Injury 48(2):406–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Larsson S, Friberg S, Hansson LI (1990) Trochanteric fractures. Influence of reduction and implant position on impaction and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 259:130-139

  15. Tsukada S, Wakui M, Yoshizawa H, Miyao M, Honma T (2016) Three-dimensional computed Tomographic analysis for Comminution of Pertrochanteric femoral fracture: Comminuted anterior cortex as a predictor of cutting out. Open Orthop J 10:62–70. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001610010062

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma G, Gn KK, Khatri K, Singh R, Gamanagatti S, Sharma V (2017) Morphology of the posteromedial fragment in pertrochanteric fractures: a three-dimensional computed tomography analysis. Injury 48(2):419–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsukada S, Okumura G, Matsueda M (2012) Postoperative stability on lateral radiographs in the surgical treatment of pertrochanteric hipfractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(6):839–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1484-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kozono N, Ikemura S, Yamashita A, Harada T, Watanabe T, Shirasawa K (2014) Direct reduction may need to be considered to avoid postoperative subtype P in patients with an unstabletrochanteric fracture: a retrospective study using a multivariate analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(12):1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2089-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ito J, Takakubo Y, Sasaki K, Sasaki J, Owashi K, Takagi M (2015) Prevention of excessive postoperative sliding of the short femoral nail in femoral trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(5):651–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2200-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Futamura K, Baba T, Homma Y, Mogami A, Kanda A, Obayashi O, Sato K, Ueda Y, Kurata Y, Tsuji H, Kaneko K (2016) New classification focusing on the relationship between the attachment of the iliofemoralligament and the course of the fracture line for intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 47(8):1685–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Loch DA, Kyle RF, Bechtold JE, Kane M, Anderson K, Sherman RE (1998) Forces required to initiate sliding in second-generation intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(11):1626–1631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim TY, Lee YB, Chang JD, Lee SS, Yoo JH, Chung KJ, Hwang JH (2015) Torsional malalignment, how much significant in the trochanteric fractures? Injury 46(11):2196–2200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee SR, Kim ST, Yoon MG, Moon MS, Heo JH (2013) The stability score of the intramedullary nailed intertrochanteric fractures: stability of nailedfracture and postoperative patient mobilization. Clin Orthop Surg 5(1):10–18. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2013.5.1.10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by funding from Shanghai Municipal Science Committee (No. 14411971900) and national Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC No.81772323).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shi-Min Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University, No. 2016012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, SM., Zhang, YQ., Du, SC. et al. Anteromedial cortical support reduction in unstable pertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of intra-operative fluoroscopy and post-operative three dimensional computerised tomography reconstruction. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 183–189 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3623-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3623-y

Keywords

Navigation