Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the effects of high tibial osteotomy on tibial rotation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Limited literature reports on internal and external rotation of the distal fragment in the context of valgus open wedge (OW) high tibial osteotomy (HTO). In the authors clinical observation, the distal fragment was always rotated internally in relation to the proximal fragment by the end of the surgical procedure. The purpose was to evaluate the influence of valgus OW-HTO on post-operative tibial torsion.

Study design

Prospective case series.

Methods

Fifty patients (10 female, 40 male; mean age 42.1 ± 9.4 years) underwent valgus OW- HTO. The osteotomy was spread and fixed with a locking plate at the posteromedial aspect of the proximal tibia. The osteotomy of the tibial tuberosity was performed either proximally or distally dependent on the patello-femoral findings. Two independent observers measured axial tibial rotation using K-wires placed into the anterior margin of the tibia proximal and distal to the osteotomy.

Results

An overall mean of 4.4 ± 2.8° internal rotation of the distal tibia has been shown. In four patients with additional single step double bundle ACL-replacement after harvesting ipsilateral autologous hamstring grafts, the distal tibia rotated internally by 0.1 ± 0.3°, accordingly in the other 46 patients by 4.8 ± 2.6°.

Conclusions

Valgus OW-HTO produces significant internal axial rotation of the distal tibia. This might be caused by soft tissue tension of the medial hamstrings/soft tissue structures and the location of the lateral tibial hinge.

Clinical relevance

Surgeons have to take into consideration that valgus OW HTO might result in significant 3D changes of the tibia. Higher degrees of internal torsion of the tibia might influence overall gait mechanics and specifically alternate patellofemoral kinematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W-Dahl A, Lidgren L, Sundberg M et al (2015) Introducing prospective national registration of knee osteotomies. A report from the first year in Sweden. Int Orthop 39:1283–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akizuki S, Shibakawa A, Takizawa T et al (2008) The long-term outcome of high tibial osteotomy: a ten- to 20-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90:592–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Altay MA, Erturk C, Altay N et al (2015) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with Anthony-K plate: prospective minimum five year follow-up data. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2919-z

  4. Amendola A, Panarella L (2005) High tibial osteotomy for the treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Orthop Clin N Am 36:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgarten KM, Meyers KN, Fealy S et al (2007) The coronal plane high tibial osteotomy. Part II: a comparison of axial rotation with the opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. HSS J 3:155–158

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Coventry MB, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL (1993) Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:196–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Faschingbauer M, Nelitz M, Urlaub S et al (2015) Return to work and sporting activities after high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 39:1527–1534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fouilleron N, Marchetti E, Autissier G et al (2010) Proximal tibial derotation osteotomy for torsional tibial deformities generating patello-femoral disorders. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:785–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaasbeek R, Welsing R, Barink M et al (2007) The influence of open and closed high tibial osteotomy on dynamic patellar tracking: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:978–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hefzy MS, Jackson WT, Saddemi SR et al (1992) Effects of tibial rotations on patellar tracking and patello-femoral contact areas. J Biomed Eng 14:329–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinterwimmer S, Beitzel K, Paul J et al (2011) Control of posterior tibial slope and patellar height in open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 39:851–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB et al (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:215–227

  13. Jang KM, Lee JH, Park HJ et al (2015) Unintended rotational changes of the distal tibia after biplane medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 31(1):59–63

  14. Kenawey M, Liodakis E, Krettek C et al (2011) Effect of the lower limb rotational alignment on tibiofemoral contact pressure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1851–1859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kendoff D, Lo D, Goleski P et al (2008) Open wedge tibial osteotomies influence on axial rotation and tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:904–910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee TQ, Morris G, Csintalan RP (2003) The influence of tibial and femoral rotation on patellofemoral contact area and pressure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33:686–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Macwilliams BA, Mcmulkin ML, Baird GO et al (2010) Distal tibial rotation osteotomies normalize frontal plane knee moments. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2835–2842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Magyar G, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lindstrand A (1999) Changes in osseous correction after proximal tibial osteotomy: radiostereometry of closed- and open-wedge osteotomy in 33 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 70:473–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mani S, Kirkpatrick MS, Saranathan A et al (2011) Tibial tuberosity osteotomy for patellofemoral realignment alters tibiofemoral kinematics. Am J Sports Med 39:1024–1031

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW et al (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 20:366–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Server F, Miralles RC, Garcia E et al (1996) Medial rotational tibial osteotomy for patellar instability secondary to lateral tibial torsion. Int Orthop 20:153–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takai S, Sakakida K, Yamashita F et al (1985) Rotational alignment of the lower limb in osteoarthritis of the knee. Int Orthop 9:209–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang JH, Bae JH, Lim HC et al (2009) Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: the effect of the cortical hinge on posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 37:2411–2418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Knut Beitzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hinterwimmer, S., Feucht, M.J., Paul, J. et al. Analysis of the effects of high tibial osteotomy on tibial rotation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 1849–1854 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3100-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3100-4

Keywords

Navigation