Skip to main content
Log in

Part 2: outcome of acetabular fractures and associated prognostic factors—a ten-year retrospective study of one hundred and fifty six operated cases with open reduction and internal fixation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Questions/purposes

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors associated with a poor quality of reduction and their relationships.

Methods

Data from medical charts for all patients admitted with acetabular fractures operated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) from 2005 to 2014 were extracted. A total of 156 patients with a mean age of 40.3 years were included. All patients were reviewed at six months of follow-up. The prognostic factors analyzed were clinical and radiological factors. A new radiological parameter was also studied: the scanographic roof-arc angle. Specific statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model.

Results

Using a multivariate analysis logistic regression model: roof impaction (p = 0.001; OR = 6.59; CI 95% [2.01–20.97]), transverse + posterior wall (p = 0.03, OR = 2.52; CI 95% [1.46–13.65]) and surgeons in training (p = 0.02; OR = 1.24; CI 95% [1.07–3.32]) were three independent prognostic factors. Lower values of medial and posterior scanographic roof-arc angle were associated with unsatisfactory reduction. A significant association between unsatisfactory reduction and posterior roof arc angle < 61° was found.

Conclusions

Three independent prognostic factors associated with a risk of unsatisfactory reduction in ORIF for acetabular fractures were identified: roof impaction, transverse + posterior wall fracture and surgeons in training. Scanographic roof-arc angle seems to be a new prognostic factor.

Level of Evidence Level 4 retrospective study

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1615–1646

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matta JM, Merritt PO (1988) Displaced acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:83–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tonetti J (2013) Management of recent unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. An update conference supported by the club bassin cotyle. (pelvis-acetabulum club). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:S77–S86. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kreder HJ, Rozen N, Borkhoff CM, Laflamme YG, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, Stephen DJ (2006) Determinants of functional outcome after simple and complex acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:776–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhandari M, Matta J, Ferguson T, Matthys G (2006) Predictors of clinical and radiological outcome in patients with fractures of the acetabulum and concomitant posterior dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1618–1624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wright R, Barrett K, Christie MJ, Johnson KD (1994) Acetabular fractures : long-term follow-up of open reduction and internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 8:397–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Øvre S, Madsen JE, Røise O (2008) Acetabular fracture displacement, roof arc angles and 2 years outcome. Injury 39:922–931. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2007.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy D, Kaliszer A, Rice J, McElwain JP (2003) Outcome after Acetabular fracture. Prognostic factors and their inter-relationships. Injury 34:512–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Borrelli J Jr, Ricci WM, Steger-May K, Totty WG, Goldfarb C (2005) Postoperative radiographic assessment of acetabular fractures. A comparison of plain radiographs and CT scans. J Orthop Trauma 19:299–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Letournel E (1980) Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop 151:81–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P (1986) Fractures of the acetabulum: a retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop 205:241–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1632–1645

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olson SA, Matta JM (1993) The computerized tomography subchondral arc: a new method of assessing acetabular articular continuity after fracture (a preliminary report). J Orthop Trauma 7:402–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chuckpaiwong B, Suwanwong P, Harnroongroj T (2009) Roof-arc angle and weight-bearing area of the acetabulum. Injury 40:1064–1066. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2009.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferguson TA, Patel R, Bhandari M, Matta JM (2010) Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: an epidemiological and radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:250–257. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anglen JO, Burd TA, Hendricks KJ, Harrison P (2003) The ‘Gull sign”: a harbinger of failure for internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 17:625–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Olson SA, Bay BK, Chapman MW, Sharkey NA (1995) Biomechanical consequences of fracture and repair of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1184–1192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Levine RG, Renard R, Behrens FF, Tornetta P 3rd (2002) Biomechanical consequences of secondary congruence after both-column acetabular fracture. J Orthop Trauma 16:87–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:2–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaskolka DN, Di Primio GA, Sheikh AM, Schweitzer ME (2014) CT of preoperative and postoperative acetabular fractures revisited. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:344–347. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182ab384a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JW, Herbert B, Hao J, Min W, Ziran BH, Mauffrey C (2015) Acetabular fractures in elderly patients: a comparative study of low-energy versus high-energy injuries. Int Orthop 39:1175–1179. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2711-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP (2003) Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:173–186

  23. Cimerman M, Kristan A (2007) Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery : the value of advanced computerised planning modules. Injury 38:442–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Simon P, von Roth P, Perka C (2015) Treatment algorithm of acetabular periprosthetic fractures. Int Orthop 39:1995–2003. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2968-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bronsema E, te Stroet MA, Zengerink M, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW (2014) Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture. Int Orthop 38:2441–2446. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2411-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Boudissa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests concerning this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boudissa, M., Ruatti, S., Kerschbaumer, G. et al. Part 2: outcome of acetabular fractures and associated prognostic factors—a ten-year retrospective study of one hundred and fifty six operated cases with open reduction and internal fixation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 2151–2156 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3070-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3070-6

Keywords

Navigation