Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to record the incidence and management of periprosthetic humeral fractures (PHF) using reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in our institution.
Methods
We performed a retrospective study of 203 RTSA implanted in 200 patients between 2003 and 2014. The mean follow-up was 78.82 months (range, 12–141). Mean age of the study cohort was 75.87 years (range, 44–88). There were only 25 male patients (12.5 %). We assessed the presence of periprosthetic humeral fractures studying the medical files and X-rays of all patients.
Results
We identified seven periprosthetic humeral fractures in 203 RTSA (3.4 %): three intra-operative (1.47 %) and four post-operative (1.97 %). The average age at the time of the fracture was 75.14 years (59–83). All patients were women (100 %). Three patients with post-operative fractures type B were treated by osteosynthesis, and one patient with post-operative fracture type A was treated conservatively. All intra-operative fractures needed cerclage wire and in one case long cemented stem. All our periprosthetic fractures healed.
Conclusions
Surgical treatment with osteosynthesis in type B post-operative fractures with a stable stem is recommended. Conservative treatment is sufficient in non-displaced type A post-operative fracture. Special attention should be paid to bone quality patients using non-cemented stems in primary surgery but especially in revision shoulder surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baulot E, Sirveaux F, Boileau P (2011) Grammont’s idea. The story of Paul Grammont’s functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2425–2431
King JJ, Farmer KW, Struk AM, Wright TW (2015) Uncemented versus cemented humeral stem fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39:291–298
Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet et al (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicenter study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86(3):388–395
Chin PYK, Sperling JW, Cofield RH et al (2006) Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different. J Should Elb Surg 15:19–22
Farshad M, Gerber C (2010) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop 34:1075–1082
Affonso J, Nicholson GP, Frankle MA et al (2012) Complications of the reverse prosthesis: prevention and treatment. Instr Course Lect 61:157–168
Cheung E, Willis M, Walker M et al (2011) Complications in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:439–449
Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y et al (2011) Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2249–2254
Kumar S, Sperling JW, Haidukewych GH et al (2004) Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:680–689
Luque R, Rizo B, Urda A et al (2014) Predictive factors for failure after total knee replacement revision. Int Orthop 38:429–435
Athwal GS, Sperling JW, Rispoli DM et al (2009) Periprosthetic humeral fractures during shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:594–603
Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr (2006) Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(10):2279–2292
Wright TW, Cofield RH (1995) Humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1340–1346
Campbell JT, Moore RS, Iannotti JP et al (1998) Periprosthetic humeral fractures: mechanisms of fracture and treatment options. J Should Elb Surg 7:406–413
Ji JH, Jeong JY, Song HS, Ok JH, Yang SJ, Jeon BK, Kim TG, Moon YS, Kim YS (2013) Early clinical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Korean population. J Should Elb Surg 22:1102–1107
Mineo GV, Accetta R, Franceschini M et al (2013) Management of shoulder periprosthetic fractures: our institutional experience and review of the literature. Injury 44(S1):S82–85
Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P (2011) Problems, complications, reoperations, and revision in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Should Elb Surg 20:146–157
Wolf H, Pajenda G, Sarahrudi K (2012) Analysis of factors predicting success and failure of treatment after type B periprosthetic humeral fractures: a case series study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 38:177–183
Wierks C, Skolasky RL, Ji JH, McFarland EG (2009) Reverse total shoulder replacement: intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):225–234
Jost PW, Dines JS, Griffith MH et al (2011) Total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing mini-stem humeral components: technique and short-term results. HSS J 7:213–217
Singh JA, Sperling J, Schleck C, Harmsen W, Cofield R (2012) Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1777–1785
Raiss P, Zeifang F, Pons-Villanueva J, Smithers CJ, Loew M, Walch G (2014) Reverse arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff deficiency after previous surgery for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Int Orthop 38:1408–1413
Atoun E, Van Togel A, Hous N, Narvani A, Relwani J, Abraham R, Levy O (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a short metaphyseal humeral stem. Int Orthop 38:1213–1218
Angelini A, Battiato C (2015) Past and present of the use of cerclage wires in orthopedics. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:623–635
Cameron B, Iannottu JP (1999) Periprosthetic of the humerus and scapula: management and prevention. Orthop Clin N Am 30:305–318
Acknowledgments
This study received no outside funding.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García-Fernández, C., Lópiz-Morales, Y., Rodríguez, A. et al. Periprosthetic humeral fractures associated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: incidence and management. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 1965–1969 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2972-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2972-7