Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gait knee kinematics after ACL reconstruction: 3D assessment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

While many studies about anterior-cruciate-ligament-deficient (ACLD) patients have demonstrated functional adaptations to protect the knee joint, an increasing number of patients undergo ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery in order to return to their desired level of activity. The purpose of this study was to compare 3D kinematic patterns between individuals having undergone ACLR with their healthy contralateral knee and a control group.

Methods

Three-dimensional kinematic data were obtained from 15 patients pre- and post-ACLR, 15 contralateral knees and 15 healthy controls. Data were recorded during treadmill walking at self-selected speed. Flexion/extension, external/internal tibial rotation, adduction/abduction and anterior/posterior tibial translation were compared between groups.

Results

ACLR knees showed a significantly higher knee-joint extension during the entire stance phase compared with ACLD knees. However, ACLR knees still showed a deficit of extension compared with healthy control knees. In the axial plane, there was no significant difference in pre- and postoperative kinematic data. Significant difference was achieved between ACLR knees and healthy control knees, specifically between 28 and 34 % and 44 and 54 % of the gait cycle. There was no significant difference in anterior–posterior translation or coronal plane between groups.

Conlusion

Following ACL reconstruction, patients have better clinical and kinematic parameters. Despite improvements, knee kinematics during gait in the ACLR group differed from the control group. These kinematic changes could lead to abnormal loading in the knee joint and initiate the process for future chondral degeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li RT, Lorenz S, Xu Y et al (2011) Predictors of radiographic knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:2595–2603. doi:10.1177/0363546511424720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rupp S, Müller B, Seil R (2001) Knee laxity after ACL reconstruction with a BPTB graft. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 9:72–76. doi:10.1007/s001670000177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grossman MG, ElAttrache NS, Shields CL, Glousman RE (2005) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Three- to nine-year follow-up. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 21:418–423. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2004.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asano H, Muneta T, Shinomiya K (2002) Evaluation of clinical factors affecting knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 15:23–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang L-Q, Shiavi RG, Limbird TJ, Minorik JM (2003) Six degrees-of-freedom kinematics of ACL deficient knees during locomotion-compensatory mechanism. Gait Posture 17:34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lorbach O, Wilmes P, Theisen D et al (2009) Reliability testing of a new device to measure tibial rotation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:920–926. doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0772-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Espregueira-Mendes J, Pereira H, Sevivas N et al (2012) Assessment of rotatory laxity in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees using magnetic resonance imaging with Porto-knee testing device. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:671–678. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-1914-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnold MP, Duthon V, Neyret P, Hirschmann MT (2013) Double incision iso-anatomical ACL reconstruction: the freedom to place the femoral tunnel within the anatomical attachment site without exception. Int Orthop 37:247–251. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1681-8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Guisea JA (1996) Improving in vivo knee kinematic measurements: application to prosthetic ligament analysis. The knee 3:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Magnussen RA, Neyret P, Cheze L, Lustig S (2012) The KneeKG system: a review of the literature. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 20:633–638. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1867-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shabani B, Bytyqi D, Lustig S et al (2014) Gait changes of the ACL-deficient knee 3D kinematic assessment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3169-0

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sati M, De Guise JA, Drouin G (1997) Computer assisted knee surgery: Diagnostics and planning of knee surgery. Comput Aided Surg 2:108–123. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1997)2:2<108::AID-IGS4>3.0.CO;2-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagemeister N, Parent G, Van de Putte M et al (2005) A reproducible method for studying three-dimensional knee kinematics. J Biomech 38:1926–1931. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao B, Zheng NN (2010) Alterations in three-dimensional joint kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and -reconstructed knees during walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:222–229. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Freiwald J, Jäger A, Starker M (1993) EMG-assisted functional analysis within the scope of follow-up of arthroscopically managed injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament. Sportverletz Sportschaden 7:122–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arciero RA, Scoville CR, Snyder RJ et al (1996) Single versus two-incision arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 12:462–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferber R, Osternig LR, Woollacott MH et al (2004) Bilateral accommodations to anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and surgery. Clin Biomech 19:136–144. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johansson H, Sjölander P, Sojka P (1990) Activity in receptor afferents from the anterior cruciate ligament evokes reflex effects on fusimotor neurones. Neurosci Res 8:54–59. doi:10.1016/0168-0102(90)90057-L

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Solomonow M, Baratta R, Zhou BH et al (1987) The synergistic action of the anterior cruciate ligament and thigh muscles in maintaining joint stability. Am J Sport Med 15:207–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bush-joseph CA, Hurwitz DE, Patel RR et al (2001) Dynamic Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Autologous Patellar Tendon. Am J Sports Med Am J Sports Med 29:36–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang H, Fleischli JE, Zheng NN (2013) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes of knee joint kinematics during walking. Am J Sports Med 41:1847–1856. doi:10.1177/0363546513490663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. M H, M D, G C, et al. (2007) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: dynamic strain evaluation of the graft. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 15:233–41

  23. Butler DL, Guan Y, Kay MD et al (1992) Location-dependent variations in the material properties of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech 25:511–518. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90091-E

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lording TD, Lustig S, Servien E, Neyret P (2014) ScienceDirect Lateral reinforcement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Asia-Pacific J Sport Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 1:3–10. doi:10.1016/j.asmart.2013.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Decker LM, Moraiti C, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD (2011) New insights into anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and reconstruction through the assessment of knee kinematic variability in terms of nonlinear dynamics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1620–1633. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1484-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tashman S (2004) Abnormal Rotational Knee Motion During Running After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:975–983. doi:10.1177/0363546503261709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schipplein OD, Andriacchi TP (1991) Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. J Orthop Res 9:113–119. doi:10.1002/jor.1100090114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Andriacchi TP, Favre J (2014) The nature of in vivo mechanical signals that influence cartilage health and progression to knee osteoarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 16:463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dye SF (1996) The knee as a biologic transmission with an envelope of function: a theory. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:10–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LBMC, IFSTTAR, Universite Lyon 1, Lyon, France

    Bujar Shabani, Dafina Bytyqi, Sebastien Lustig, Laurence Cheze & Philippe Neyret

  2. Albert Trillat Center, Lyon, France

    Bujar Shabani, Dafina Bytyqi, Sebastien Lustig & Philippe Neyret

  3. Orthopaedic Hospital, University Clinical Center of Kosova, University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Kosovo

    Bujar Shabani, Dafina Bytyqi & Cen Bytyqi

  4. Lagjia e Universitetit, rr1, nr 32, 10000, Prishtina, Kosovo

    Bujar Shabani

Authors
  1. Bujar Shabani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dafina Bytyqi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastien Lustig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laurence Cheze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cen Bytyqi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Philippe Neyret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bujar Shabani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shabani, B., Bytyqi, D., Lustig, S. et al. Gait knee kinematics after ACL reconstruction: 3D assessment. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 1187–1193 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2643-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2643-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation