Skip to main content
Log in

Dislocation of bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty through a postero-lateral approach for femoral neck fractures: A cohort study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze postoperative global femoral offset (FO), leg length discrepancy (LLD) and Wiberg angle as risk factors for prosthetic dislocation after treatment with bipolar hemiarthoplasty (HA) through a postero-lateral approach for femoral neck fracture (FNF).

Methods

Three hundred and seventy three patients treated with a cemented bipolar HA through a postero-lateral approach between January 2006 and December 2013 were included in a cohort study with a follow-up time ranging from 6 months to 7 years. Radiographs and all surgical records were reviewed regarding Global FO, LLD and Wiberg angle. We compared stable hips without dislocation to those with either a single dislocation and those with recurrent instability.

Results

Three hundred and twenty eight hips fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the study. The incidence of prosthetic dislocation was 10.7 % (36/373). The mean time from surgery to first dislocation was 3.9 months (0-47) and 62.5 % had recurrent dislocations. Patients with dislocation had a statistically significantly decreased postoperative global FO (-6.4 mm vs. -2.8 mm, p = 0.04), LLD (-2 vs. 1.5 mm, p = 0.03) and smaller Wiberg angle (40° vs. 46°, p = 0.01) on the operated side compared with the rest of cohort. In comparison to age and sex-matched control groups from the cohort, the difference in the radiographic parameters were significant in patients with recurrent dislocations but not in patients with a single dislocation.

Conclusion

Patients with recurrent dislocations had a decreased postoperative global FO, shorter leg and shallower acetabulum on the operated side compared with their controls. These factors might decrease the soft-tissue tension around the operated hip and predispose to dislocation.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Thorngren 2011

  2. Blewitt N, Mortimore S (1992) Outcome of dislocation after hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of the femur. Injury 23:320–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen MB, Jørgensen HL, Hansen K et al (2006) Factors affecting postoperative mortality of patients with displaced femoral neck fracture. Injury 37:705–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ninh CC, Sethi A, Hatahet M et al (2009) Hip dislocation after modular unipolar hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:768–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Enocson A, Pettersson H, Ponzer S, Tornkvist H, Dalen N, Tidermark J (2009) Quality of life after dislocation of hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 319 patients with femoral neck fractures with a one-year follow-up. Qual Life Res 18(9):1177–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore AT (1957) The self-locking metal hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 39-A:811–827

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:17–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Suh KT, Park BG, Choi YJ (2004) A posterior approach to primary hip arthroplasty with soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop 418:162–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ko CK, Law SW, Chiu KH (2001) Enhanced soft tissue repair using locking loop stich after posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:207–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Enocson A, Tidermark J, Törnkvist H et al (2008) Dislocation of hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture: better outcome after the anterolateral approach in a prospective cohort study on 739 consecutive hips. Acta Orthop 79:211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pajarinen J, Savolainen V, Tulikoura I et al (2003) Factors predisposing to dislocation of the Thompson hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 74:45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Enocson A, Hedbeck CJ, Törnkvist H (2012) Unipolar versus bipolar Exeter hip hemiarthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 830 consecutive hips in patients with femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop 36(4)

  13. Kjellberg M, Englund E, Sayed-Noor AS (2009) A new radiographic method of measuring femoral offset. The Sundsvall method. Hip Int 19:377–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Endo Y, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD et al (2005) Gender differences in patients with hip fracture: a greater risk of morbidity and mortality in men. J Orthop Trauma 19:29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J et al (2012) Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 43:676–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leonardsson O, Garellick G, Kärrholm J et al (2012) Changes in implant choice and surgical technique for hemiarthroplasty. 21,346 procedures from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register 2005-2009. Acta Orthop 83:7–13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sköldenberg O, Ekman A, Salemyr M et al (2010) Reduced dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures when changing from posterolateral to anterolateral approach. Acta Orthop 81:583–587

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogmark C, Fenstad AM, Leonardsson O et al (2014) Posterior approach and uncemented stems increases the risk of reoperation after hemiarthroplasties in elderly hip fracture patients. Acta Orthop 85:18–25

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Madanat R, Mäkinen TJ, Ovaska MT et al (2012) Dislocation of hip hemiarthroplasty following posterolateral surgical approach: a nested case-control study. Int Orthop 36:935–940

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barnes CL, Berry DJ, Sledge CB (1995) Dislocation after bipolar hemiarthroplasty of the hip. J Arthroplasty 10:667–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noon AP, Hockings M, Warner J (2005) Dislocated Thompson hemiarthroplasty - the management of the recurrent dislocator. Injury 36:618–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wallner O, Stark A, Muren O, Eisler T, Sköldenberg O (2014) Unstable hip arthroplasties. A prospective cohort study on seventy dislocating hips followed up for four years. Int Orthop. Nov 13. [Epub ahead of print]

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Source of funding

No external funding was received for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Mukka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukka, S., Lindqvist, J., Peyda, S. et al. Dislocation of bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty through a postero-lateral approach for femoral neck fractures: A cohort study . International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 1277–1282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2642-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2642-1

Keywords

Navigation