Abstract
Purpose
To analyze postoperative global femoral offset (FO), leg length discrepancy (LLD) and Wiberg angle as risk factors for prosthetic dislocation after treatment with bipolar hemiarthoplasty (HA) through a postero-lateral approach for femoral neck fracture (FNF).
Methods
Three hundred and seventy three patients treated with a cemented bipolar HA through a postero-lateral approach between January 2006 and December 2013 were included in a cohort study with a follow-up time ranging from 6 months to 7 years. Radiographs and all surgical records were reviewed regarding Global FO, LLD and Wiberg angle. We compared stable hips without dislocation to those with either a single dislocation and those with recurrent instability.
Results
Three hundred and twenty eight hips fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the study. The incidence of prosthetic dislocation was 10.7 % (36/373). The mean time from surgery to first dislocation was 3.9 months (0-47) and 62.5 % had recurrent dislocations. Patients with dislocation had a statistically significantly decreased postoperative global FO (-6.4 mm vs. -2.8 mm, p = 0.04), LLD (-2 vs. 1.5 mm, p = 0.03) and smaller Wiberg angle (40° vs. 46°, p = 0.01) on the operated side compared with the rest of cohort. In comparison to age and sex-matched control groups from the cohort, the difference in the radiographic parameters were significant in patients with recurrent dislocations but not in patients with a single dislocation.
Conclusion
Patients with recurrent dislocations had a decreased postoperative global FO, shorter leg and shallower acetabulum on the operated side compared with their controls. These factors might decrease the soft-tissue tension around the operated hip and predispose to dislocation.
Level of Evidence
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Thorngren 2011
Blewitt N, Mortimore S (1992) Outcome of dislocation after hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of the femur. Injury 23:320–322
Petersen MB, Jørgensen HL, Hansen K et al (2006) Factors affecting postoperative mortality of patients with displaced femoral neck fracture. Injury 37:705–711
Ninh CC, Sethi A, Hatahet M et al (2009) Hip dislocation after modular unipolar hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:768–774
Enocson A, Pettersson H, Ponzer S, Tornkvist H, Dalen N, Tidermark J (2009) Quality of life after dislocation of hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 319 patients with femoral neck fractures with a one-year follow-up. Qual Life Res 18(9):1177–1184
Moore AT (1957) The self-locking metal hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 39-A:811–827
Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:17–19
Suh KT, Park BG, Choi YJ (2004) A posterior approach to primary hip arthroplasty with soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop 418:162–167
Ko CK, Law SW, Chiu KH (2001) Enhanced soft tissue repair using locking loop stich after posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:207–211
Enocson A, Tidermark J, Törnkvist H et al (2008) Dislocation of hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture: better outcome after the anterolateral approach in a prospective cohort study on 739 consecutive hips. Acta Orthop 79:211–217
Pajarinen J, Savolainen V, Tulikoura I et al (2003) Factors predisposing to dislocation of the Thompson hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 74:45–48
Enocson A, Hedbeck CJ, Törnkvist H (2012) Unipolar versus bipolar Exeter hip hemiarthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 830 consecutive hips in patients with femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop 36(4)
Kjellberg M, Englund E, Sayed-Noor AS (2009) A new radiographic method of measuring femoral offset. The Sundsvall method. Hip Int 19:377–381
Endo Y, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD et al (2005) Gender differences in patients with hip fracture: a greater risk of morbidity and mortality in men. J Orthop Trauma 19:29–35
Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J et al (2012) Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 43:676–685
Leonardsson O, Garellick G, Kärrholm J et al (2012) Changes in implant choice and surgical technique for hemiarthroplasty. 21,346 procedures from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register 2005-2009. Acta Orthop 83:7–13
Sköldenberg O, Ekman A, Salemyr M et al (2010) Reduced dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures when changing from posterolateral to anterolateral approach. Acta Orthop 81:583–587
Rogmark C, Fenstad AM, Leonardsson O et al (2014) Posterior approach and uncemented stems increases the risk of reoperation after hemiarthroplasties in elderly hip fracture patients. Acta Orthop 85:18–25
Madanat R, Mäkinen TJ, Ovaska MT et al (2012) Dislocation of hip hemiarthroplasty following posterolateral surgical approach: a nested case-control study. Int Orthop 36:935–940
Barnes CL, Berry DJ, Sledge CB (1995) Dislocation after bipolar hemiarthroplasty of the hip. J Arthroplasty 10:667–669
Noon AP, Hockings M, Warner J (2005) Dislocated Thompson hemiarthroplasty - the management of the recurrent dislocator. Injury 36:618–621
Wallner O, Stark A, Muren O, Eisler T, Sköldenberg O (2014) Unstable hip arthroplasties. A prospective cohort study on seventy dislocating hips followed up for four years. Int Orthop. Nov 13. [Epub ahead of print]
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest related to this study.
Source of funding
No external funding was received for the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mukka, S., Lindqvist, J., Peyda, S. et al. Dislocation of bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty through a postero-lateral approach for femoral neck fractures: A cohort study . International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 1277–1282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2642-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2642-1