Skip to main content
Log in

Distal tibia fractures and medial plating: factors influencing re-operation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We compared types of complications leading to re-operations in open and closed distal tibia fractures treated by locking or nonlocking medial plates.

Methods

Ninety-three patients from 2002 to 2012 who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and medial plating for distal extra-articular or partial articular tibia fractures were identified. Charts were retrospectively reviewed to determine the incidence of re-operation based on the type of complication that developed. Fisher’s exact and chi-square tests were performed to analyze the incidence of complications based on injury and type of plate used.

Results

Thirty-three (35.5 %) patients required re-operations: 28.6 % (n = 16) with closed injuries had complications leading to re-operations compared with 45.9 % (n = 17) of patients with open injuries (p = 0.12). Patients with closed injuries were more likely to require re-operation due to hardware pain/prominence (p = 0.03), whereas patients with open injuries were more likely to require re-operation due to nonunion (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in infection (p = 0.66) or malunion (p = 0.99) between groups. Locking plates showed higher costs but were not associated with decreased risk of re-operation.

Conclusions

There was a high re-operation rate associated with distal tibia medial plating, with significant differences in the reason for re-operation between open versus closed groups. Complication rates were not influenced by the use of locking plates. Results of this study suggest that methods be considered to reduce re-operation based on type of fracture, such as early bone grafting or the use of alternate implants for open fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joveniaux P, Ohl X, Harisboure A et al (2010) Distal tibia fractures: management and complications of 101 cases. Int Orthop 34:583–588

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koval KJ, Clapper MF, Brumback RJ et al (1991) Complications of reamed intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Orthop Trauma 5:184–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lau TW, Leung F, Chan CF et al (2008) Wound complication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop 32:697–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Borg T, Sune L, Ulf L (2004) Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures: preliminary results in 21 patients. Injury 35:608–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dailey EA, Cizik A, Kasten J et al (2013) Risk factors for readmission of orthopaedic surgical patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1012–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen AL, Tejwani NC, Joseph TN et al (2001) The effect of distal screw orientation on the intrinsic stability of a tibial intramedullary nail. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 60:80–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strauss EJ, Alfonso D, Kummer FJ et al (2007) The effect of concurrent fibular fracture on the fixation of distal tibia fractures: a laboratory comparison of intramedullary nails with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 21:172–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng W, Li Y, Manyi W (2011) Comparison study of two surgical options for distal tibia fracture—minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis vs. open reduction and internal fixation. Int Orthop 5:737–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasenboehler E, Rikli D, Babst R (2007) Locking compression plate with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal and distal tibial fracture: a retrospective study of 32 patients. Injury 38:365–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khoury A, Liebergall M, London E et al (2002) Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Foot Ankle Int 23:818–824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Janssen KW, Biert J, van Kampen A (2007) Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail. Int Orthop 31(5):709–714

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vallier HA, Le TT, Bedi A (2008) Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond): plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 22:307–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM (2011) Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25:736–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Im GI, Tae SK (2005) Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 59:1219–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zelle BA, Bhandari M, Espiritu M et al (2006) Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a systematic review of 1125 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20:76–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee YS, Chen SH, Lin JC et al (2009) Surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures: a comparison of medial and lateral plating. Orthopedics 32:163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yenna ZC, Bhadra AK, Ojike NI et al (2011) Anterolateral and medial locking plate stiffness in distal tibia fracture model. Foot Ankle Int 32(6):630–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Encinas-Ullan C, Fernandez-Fernandez R, Rubio-Suarez JC et al (2013) Medial versus lateral plating in distal tibia fractures: a prospective study of 40 fractures. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 57(2):117–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao H, Zu-Bin Z, Bing-Fang Z (2009) Fractures of the distal tibia treated with polyaxial locking plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:831–837

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Namazi H, Mozaffarian K (2007) Awful considerations with LCP instrumentation: a new pitfall. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:573–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gosling T, Schandelmaier P, Muller M et al (2005) Single lateral locked screw plating of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E et al (2004) Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 218:488–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson CM, McLauchlan GJ, McLean IP et al (1995) Distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia with minimal involvement of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77-B:781–787

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nork SE, Schwartz AK, Agel J et al (2005) Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1213–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li B, Yang Y, Jian L-S (2013) Plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing for displaced extra-articular distal tibia fractures: a system review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. doi:10.1007/s00590-013-1362-3

Download references

Conflicts of interest and source of funding

William Obremskey previously consulted for biometrics and provided expert testimony in legal matters. The institution of WTO received a grant from the Department of Defense. For the remaining authors, there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish K. Sethi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sathiyakumar, V., Thakore, R.V., Ihejirika, R.C. et al. Distal tibia fractures and medial plating: factors influencing re-operation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 1483–1488 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2345-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2345-7

Keywords

Navigation