Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reviewing subchondral cartilage surgery: considerations for standardised and outcome predictable cartilage remodelling

A technical note

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The potential of subchondral mesenchymal stem cell stimulation (MSS) for cartilage repair has led to the widespread use of microfracture as a first line treatment for full thickness articular cartilage defects. Recent focus on the effects of subchondral bone during cartilage injury and repair has expanded the understanding of the strengths and limitations in MSS and opened new pathways for potential improvement. Comparative studies have shown that bone marrow access has positive implications for pluripotential cell recruitment, repair quality and quantity, i.e. deeper channels elicited better cartilage fill, more hyaline cartilage character with higher type II collagen content and lower type I collagen content compared to shallow marrow access.

Methods

A subchondral needling procedure using standardised and thin subchondral perforations deep into the subarticular bone marrow making the MSS more consistent with the latest developments in subchondral cartilage remodelling is proposed.

Results

As this is a novel method clinical studies have been initiated to evaluate the procedure especially compared to microfracturing. However, the first case studies and follow-ups indicate that specific drills facilitate reaching the subchondral bone marrow while the needle size makes perforation of the subchondral bone easier and more predictable. Clinical results of the first group of patients seem to compare well to microfracturing.

Conclusion

The authors suggest a new method for a standardised procedure using a new perforating device. Advances in MSS by subchondral bone marrow perforation are discussed. It remains to be determined by clinical studies how this method compares to microfracturing. The subchondral needling offers the surgeon and the investigator a method that facilitates comparison studies because of its defined depth of subchondral penetration and needle size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pridie KH (1959) A method of resurfacing osteoarthritic knee joints. J Bone Joint Surg 41B:618–619

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Singleton SB, Briggs KK (1997) Microfracture technique for full thickness chondral defects: technique and clinical results. Oper Tech Orthop 7:300–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asik M, Ciftci F, Sen C, Erdil M, Atalar A (2008) The microfracture technique for the treatment of full-thickness articular lesions of the knee: midterm results. Arthroscopy 24(11):1214–1220. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.06.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kramer J, Böhrnsen F, Lindner U, Behrens P, Schlenke P, Rohwedel J (2006) In vivo matrix-guided human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 63(5):616–626. doi:10.1007/s00018-005-5527-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kreuz PC, Steinwachs MR, Erggelet C, Krause SJ, Konrad G, Uhl M, Sudkamp N (2006) Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthr Cartil 14:1119–1125. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2006.05.003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ, Warren RF, Potter HG, Spock CR, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Marx RG (2005) The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg 87A:1911–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Kocher MS, Gill TJ, Rodkey WG (2003) Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 19(5):477–484. doi:10.1053/jars.2003.50112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan WS, Johnson DS, Hardingham TE (2010) The potential of stem cells in the treatment of knee cartilage defects. Knee 17:369–374. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shapiro F, Koide S, Glimcher MJ (1993) Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:532–553

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen H, Sun J, Hoeman CD, Lascau-Coman V, Ouyang W, McKee MD, Shive MS, Buschamnn MD (2009) Drilling and microfracture lead to different bone structure and necrosis during bone-marrow stimulation for cartilage repair. J Orthop Res 27:1432–1438. doi:10.1002/jor.20905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen H, Hoemann CD, Sun J, Chevrier A, McKee MD, Shive MS, Hurtig M, Buschmann MD (2011) Depth of subchondral perforation influences the outcome of bone marrow stimulation cartilage repair. J Orthop Res 29(8):1178–1184. doi:10.1002/jor.21386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cole BJ, Cohen B (2000) Chondral injuries of the knee: a contemporary view of cartilage restoration. Orthop Spec Ed 6:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gomoll AH, Madry H, Knutsen G, van Dijk N, Seil R, Brittberg M, Kon E (2010) The subchondral bone in articular cartilage repair: current problems in the surgical management. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol 18:434–447. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1072-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Minas T, Gomoll A, Solhpour S, Rosenberger R, Probst C, Brynat T (2009) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for joint preservation in patients with early osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:147–157. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0998-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mithoefer K, McAdam T, Williams RJ, Kreuz PC, Mandelbaum BR (2009) Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med 37:2053–2063. doi:10.1177/0363546508328414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1998) Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration and transplantation. Instr Course Lect 47:487–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SJ, Aadalen KJ, Malaviya P, Lorenz EP, Hayden JK, Farr J, Kang RW, Cole BJ (2006) Tibiofemoral contact mechanics after serial medial meniscectomies in the human cadaveric knee. Am J Sports Med 34(8):1334–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gomoll AH, Farr J, Gillogly SD, Kercher J, Minas T (2010) Surgical management of articular defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 92A(14):2470–2490

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heijink A, Gomoll AH, Madry H, Drobnic M, Filardo G, Espregueira-Mendes J, Van Dijk CN (2012) Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:423–435. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1818-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benthien JP, Behrens P (2011) The treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC): method description and recent developments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol 19:1316–1319. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1356-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gomoll AH, Filardo G, de Girolamo L, Esprequeira-Mendes J, Marcacci M, Rodkey WG, Steadman RJ, Zaffagnini S, Kon E (2012) Surgical treatment for early osteoarthritis. Part 1: cartilage repair procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:450–466. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1780-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ, Warren RF, Potter HG, Spock CR, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Marx RG (2006) Chondral resurfacing of articular cartilage defects in the knee with the microfracture technique. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg 88A(Suppl 1):294–304. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00292

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orth P, Goebel L, Wolfram U, Ong MF, Gräber S, Kohn D, Cucchiarini M, Ignatius A, Pape D, Madry H (2012) Effect of subchondral drilling on the microarchitecture of subchondral bone: analysis in a large animal model at 6 months. Am J Sports Med 40(4):828–836. doi:10.1177/0363546511430376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hunziker EB (2001) Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthr Cartil 10:432–463. doi:10.1053/joca.2002.0814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC, Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Solheim E, Strand T, Roberts S, Isaksen V, Johansen O (2004) Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:455–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Steadman R, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK (2010) Microfracture: its history and experience of the developing surgeon. Cartilage 1(2):78–86. doi:10.1177/1947603510365533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Madry H, Luyten FP, Facchini A (2012) Biological aspects of early osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol 20:407–422. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1705-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Richmond J, Mandelbum B, DeDeyne PG (2011) Outcomes after a single-stage procedure for cell-based cartilage repair: a prospective clinical safety trial with 2–year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 39:1170–1179. doi:10.1177/0363546511399382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Niemeyer P, Koestler W, Sudkamp NP (2011) Problems and complications of surgical techniques for treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects. Z Orthop Unfall 149:45–51. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1270894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Saris DBF, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, Almqvist KF, Verdonk R, Bellemans J, Luyten FP (2009) Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med 37(Suppl 1):10S–19S. doi:10.1177/0363546509350694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Dijk C, Reilingh ML, Zengerink M, van Bergan CJA (2010) Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol 18:570–580. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1064-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Frisbie DD, Oxford JT, Southwood L, Trotter GW, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR, Goodnight JL, McIlwraith CW (2003) Early events in cartilage repair after subchondral bone microfracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:215–227. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000030514.43495.f3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cole BJ, Pascua-Garrido C, Grumet R (2009) Surgical management of articular defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 91A:1778–1790

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gille J, Kunow J, Boisch L, Behrens P, Bos I, Hoffman C, Koller W, Risslies M, Kurz B (2010) Cell-laden and cell-free matrix-induced chondrogenesis versus microfracture for the treatment of articular defects: a histological and biomechanical study in sheep. Cartil 1:29–42. doi:10.1177/1947603509358721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Frisbie DD, Morisset S, Ho CP, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR, McIlwraith CW (2006) Effects of calcified cartilage on healing of chondral defects treated with microfracture in horses. Am J Sports Med 34:1824–1831. doi:10.1177/0363546506289882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Steinwachs MR, Giggi T, Kreuz PC (2008) Marrow stimulation techniques. Inj Int J Care Inj 3951:S26–S31. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ (2001) “Microfracture”: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:S362–S369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McIlwraith CW, Frisbie DD, Rodkey WG, Kisiday JD, Werpy NM, Kawcak CE, Steadman JR (2011) Evaluation of intra-articular mesenchymal stem class to augment healing of microfractured chondral defects. Arthroscopy 27:1552–1561. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Davos Hospital, 7270, Davos Platz, Switzerland

    Jan P. Benthien

  2. Cuno Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamburg, Germany

    Peter Behrens

Authors
  1. Jan P. Benthien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Behrens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan P. Benthien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benthien, J.P., Behrens, P. Reviewing subchondral cartilage surgery: considerations for standardised and outcome predictable cartilage remodelling. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 2139–2145 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2025-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2025-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation