Skip to main content
Log in

One portal simultaneous bilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release under local anaesthesia. Do the results justify the effort?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether simultaneous bilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release could be effectively and safely performed under local anaesthesia.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated 85 consecutive patients (62 females) who underwent simultaneous one portal endoscopic bilateral carpal tunnel release with subcutaneous injection of 2 mL 2 % lidocaine. In case of pain after discharge, all patients were advised to take paracetamol (i.e., acetaminophen) and to record the dose of drug taken. Patients were reviewed at regular intervals until one year postoperatively.

Results

The mean operative time was 31.2 min. Postoperatively, only nine patients (10.6 %) received on average 611 mg of paracetamol. Significant improvement was noticed in the parameters of numbness, pain, positive Phalen and Tinel tests, pinch strength, grip strength, tip pinch strength and Quick DASH Score. Patients returned fully to work after surgery in average 2.2 weeks. Conversion to open release took place in four wrists (2.4 %). Discomfort and pain from tourniquet pressure was reported from two patients (2.4 %). Two wrists (1.2 %) required revision surgery. One patient (1.2 %) reported temporary thenar numbness and another (1.2 %) had slight scar hypersensitivity.

Conclusions

Simultaneous bilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release under local anaesthesia is well tolerated by patients. The technique may be of benefit in young, active, high-demand patients who require fast recovery, early return to work and less disability time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thoma A, Veltri K, Haines T, Duku E (2004) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1137–1146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber RA, Boyer KM (2005) Consecutive versus simultaneous bilateral carpal tunnel release. Ann Plast Surg 54:15–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scholten RJ, Mink van der Molen A, Uitdehaag BM, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:CD003905

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benson LS, Bare AA, Nagle DJ, Harder VS, Williams CS, Visotsky JL (2006) Complications of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy 22:919–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferdinand RD, MacLean JG (2002) Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective, randomised, blinded assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:375–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nesbitt KS, Innis PC, Dubin NH, Wilgis EF (2006) Staged versus simultaneous bilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:139–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang AA, Hutchinson DT, Vanderhooft JE (2003) Bilateral simultaneous open carpal tunnel release: a prospective study of postoperative activities of daily living and patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg Am 28:845–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang CW, Wang YC, Chang KF (2008) A practical electrophysiological guide for non-surgical and surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur 33:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  9. Agee JM, McCarroll HR Jr, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Szabo RM, Peimer CA (1992) Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am 17:987–995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fehringer EV, Tiedeman JJ, Dobler K, McCarthy JA (2002) Bilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel releases: simultaneous versus staged operative intervention. Arthroscopy 18:316–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Odinsson A, Finsen V (2002) The position of the tourniquet on the upper limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:202–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nabhan A, Ishak B, Al-Khayat J, Steudel WI (2008) Endoscopic carpal tunnel release using a modified application technique of local anesthesia: safety and effectiveness. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 3:11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nabhan A, Steudel WI, Dedeman L, Al-Khayat J, Ishak B (2011) Subcutaneous local anesthesia versus intravenous regional anesthesia for endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 114:240–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sorensen AM, Dalsgaard J, Hansen TB (2012) Local anaesthesia versus intravenous regional anaesthesia in endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 38(5):481–484

    Google Scholar 

  15. Altissimi M, Mancini GB (1988) Surgical release of the median nerve under local anaesthesia for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 13:395–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gale DW (1991) Surgical decompression of the carpal tunnel using infiltrative anaesthesia: description of technique. J R Coll Surg Edinb 36:341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Patil S, Ramakrishnan M, Stothard J (2006) Local anaesthesia for carpal tunnel decompression: a comparison of two techniques. J Hand Surg Br 31:683–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byron E. Chalidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chalidis, B.E., Dimitriou, C.G. One portal simultaneous bilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release under local anaesthesia. Do the results justify the effort?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 1501–1505 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1951-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1951-0

Keywords

Navigation