Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of sonicate fluid cultures in comparison to histological analysis of the periprosthetic membrane for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of sonicate fluid cultures (SFC) and the histological analysis of the periprosthetic membrane (PM) for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods

The histological samples were evaluated according to the consensus classification of PM as defined by Morawietz and Krenn. All explanted endoprosthesis were subject to sonication. Additionally, a synovial aspiration and microbiological culture of tissue samples were performed for each patient. Twenty three of the 59 patients had an established PJI.

Results

Sonication achieved the highest sensitivity out of all diagnostic methods with 91 % and a specificity of 81 %. The PM achieved a sensitivity of 87 % and a specificity of 100 %. In three cases of PJI a pathogen was isolated solely by sonication while all other microbiological methods were negative. In seven cases there was a positive bacterial culture through sonication with negative histology.

Conclusions

Our results show a high correlation between the microbiological and histological results. In our patient group sonication achieved the highest sensitivity out of all diagnostic methods and was more sensitive than conventional microbiological methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achermann Y, Vogt M, Leunig M, Wüst J, Trampuz A (2010) Improved diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection by multiplex polymerase chain reaction in sonication fluid of removed implants. J Clin Microbiol 48:1208–1214. doi:10.1128/jcm.00006-10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL, Aggarwal A, Burnett RS, Clohisy JC, Ghanem E, Sharkey P, Parvizi J (2007) The fate of the unexpected positive intraoperative cultures after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:94–99. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schäfer P, Frommelt L (2008) The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:874–878. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.90b7.20417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frommelt L (2008) Aspiration of joint fluid for detection of the pathogen in periprosthetic infection. Orthopade 37:1027–1034, quiz 1035–1036. doi:10.1007/s00132-008-1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morawietz L, Schröder JH, Dynybil C, Perka C, Skwara A, Neidel J, Gehrke T, Frommelt L, Hansen T, Otto M, Barden B, Aigner T, Stiehl P, Schubert T, Meyer-Scholten C, König A, Ströbel P, Rader CP, Kirschner S, Lintner F, Rüther W, Bos I, Hendrich C, Kriegsmann J, Krenn V (2006) Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane. J Clin Pathol 59:591–597. doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.027458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Müller M, Morawietz L, Hasart O, Strube P, Perka C, Tohtz S (2008) Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty—evaluation of the diagnostic values of pre- and intraoperative parameters and the associated strategy to reoperatively select patients with a high probability of joint infection. J Orthop Surg Res 3:31. doi:10.1186/1749-799x-3-31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Müller M, Morawietz L, Hasart O, Strube P, Perka C, Tohtz S (2009) Histopathologische Diagnose der periprothetischen Gelenkinfektion nach Hüftgelenkersatz. Orthopade 38:1087–1096. doi:10.1007/s00132-009-1471-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schäfer P, Fink B, Sandow D, Margull A, Berger I, Frommelt L (2008) Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis 47:1403–1409. doi:10.1086/592973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tohtz S, Morawietz L, Winkler T, Perka C (2009) Validity of frozen sections for analysis of periprosthetic loosening membranes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:762–768. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1102-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2006) Sonication of explanted prosthetic components in bags for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is associated with risk of contamination. J Clin Microbiol 44:628–631. doi:10.1128/jcm.44.2.628-631.2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R (2007) Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 357:654–663. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa061588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Gorman SP, Nixon JR, Anderson N, Davis RI, Hanna D, Ramage G (1998) Improved detection of infection in hip replacements a currently underestimated problem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:568–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Reinhold Schiller M.D. for his comprehensive microbiological support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Janz.

Additional information

V. Janz and G. I. Wassilew contributed equally to the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janz, V., Wassilew, G.I., Hasart, O. et al. Evaluation of sonicate fluid cultures in comparison to histological analysis of the periprosthetic membrane for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 931–936 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1853-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1853-1

Keywords

Navigation