Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated care pathways in lower-limb arthroplasty: are they effective in reducing length of hospital stay?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of an integrated care pathway (ICP) for total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) on length of stay (LOS), day of surgery admission rate (DOSA) and postoperative length of stay (POLOS).

Methods

Three hundred and eight THAs and 299 TKAs were assessed in a retrospective before–after trial design. LOS, POLOS and DOSA were recorded for patients before and after introduction of the ICP. The ICP encompassed a patient education programme, specific daily management goals, variance mapping, daily facilitated meetings and a DOSA policy. Subgroup analysis according to age and gender was also performed.

Results

Mean LOS was significantly reduced by 1.4 (from 6.9 to 5.5) days for THA and 0.8 (from 6.4 to 5.6) days for TKA. Elderly patients and men achieved greater LOS reductions than their counterparts for both operations. Younger patients undergoing THA achieved a significantly higher DOSA rate than older patients (89 % vs 71 %, p = 0.010); however, this difference was not observed in the TKA population. Mean POLOS for THA was reduced by 0.6 (from 5.9 to 5.3) days, again with the greatest benefit seen in elderly and male patients. POLOS for TKA patients was not significantly affected by the ICP.

Conclusions

The introduction of an ICP reduced LOS by 1.4 days for THA and 0.8 days for TKA. Elderly and male patients benefitted most.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hospital Episodes Statistics Online (2009) Hospital Episode Statistics. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk :Accessed 14 Februay 2012

  2. HM Treasury (2010) Budget 2010: Securing the recovery. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/budget2010.htm :Accessed 14 February 2012

  3. Brunenberg DE, Van Steyn MJ, Sluimer JC, Bekebrede LL, Bulstra SK, Joore MA (2005) Joint recovery programme versus usual care: an economic evaluation of a clinical pathway for joint replacement surgery. Med Care 43:1018–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowsey MM, Kilgour ML, Santamaria NM, Choong PF (1999) Clinical pathways in hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study. Med J Aust 170:59–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Husni ME, Losina E, Fossel AH, Solomon DH, Mahomed NN, Katz JN (2010) Decreasing medical complications for total knee arthroplasty: effect of critical pathways on outcomes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Macario A, Horne M, Goodman S, Vitez T, Dexter F, Heinen R, Brown B (1998) The effect of a perioperative clinical pathway for knee replacement surgery on hospital costs. Anesth Analg 86:978–984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scranton PE (1999) The cost effectiveness of streamlined care pathways and product standardization in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 14:182–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Tuerlinckx G, Witters I, Vandenneucker H, Bellemans J (2005) Development of a clinical pathway for total knee arthroplasty and the effect on length of stay and in-hospital functional outcome. Acta Orthop Belg 71:439–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Larsen K, Hansen TB, Thomsen PB, Christiansen T, Søballe K (2009) Cost-effectiveness of accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:761–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Gothe H, Willis J, Snow P, Kugler J (2010) Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD006632

  11. Barbieri A, Vanhaecht K, Van Herck P, Sermeus W, Faggiano F, Marchisio S, Panella M (2009) Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis. BMC Med 7:32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rotter T, Kugler J, Koch R, Gothe H, Twork S, Van Oostrum JM, Steyerberg EW (2008) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of clinical pathways on length of stay, hospital costs and patient outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res 8:265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Srikanth VK, Fryer JL, Zhai G, Winzenberg TM, Hosmer D, Jones G (2005) A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 13:769–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli E, Liang MH, Karlson EW, Cleary PD (1994) Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:687–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holtzman J, Saleh K, Kane R (2002) Gender differences in functional status and pain in a Medicare population undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Med Care 40:461–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vincent KR, Vincent HK, Lee LW, Alfano AP (2006) Outcomes in total knee arthroplasty patients after inpatient rehabilitation: influence of age and gender. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 85:482–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vincent HK, Alfano AP, Lee L, Vincent KR (2006) Sex and age effects on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:461–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khan F, Ng L, Gonzalez S, Hale T, Turner-Stokes L (2008) Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes following joint replacement at the hip and knee in chronic arthropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD004957

  19. Dy SM, Garg PP, Nyberg D, Dawson PB, Pronovost PJ, Morlock L, Rubin HR, Diener-West M, Wu AW (2003) Are critical pathways effective for reducing postoperative length of stay? Med Care 41:637–648

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook JR, Warren M, Ganley KJ, Prefontaine P, Wylie JW (2008) A comprehensive joint replacement program for total knee arthroplasty: a descriptive study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Husted H, Holm G, Jacobsen S (2008) Predictors of length of stay and patient satisfaction after hip and knee replacement surgery: fast-track experience in 712 patients. Acta Orthop 79:168–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Forrest G, Fuchs M, Gutierrez A, Girardy J (1998) Factors affecting length of stay and need for rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 13:186–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dall GF, Ohly NE, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ (2009) The influence of pre-operative factors on the length of in-patient stay following primary total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a multivariate analysis of 2302 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:434–440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Foote J, Panchoo K, Blair P, Bannister G (2009) Length of stay following primary total hip replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91:500–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME (2001) The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med 161:454–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikas Khanduja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mertes, S.C., Raut, S. & Khanduja, V. Integrated care pathways in lower-limb arthroplasty: are they effective in reducing length of hospital stay?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 1157–1163 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1829-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1829-1

Keywords

Navigation