Skip to main content
Log in

Significant benefit for older patients after arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a long-term follow-up study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients suffering from isolated subacromial impingement (SI) of their shoulder but who are resistant to other therapies benefit substantially from arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) if they are young (<60 years). Although physical demands rise notably in the older population, it still remains unclear if surgery leads to better results in these patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to focus on the impact of age on the functional outcome in elderly patients suffering from SI.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, 307 patients (age range: 42–63 years) with isolated SI were enrolled. The 165 patients were allocated to physical therapy whereas 142 underwent ASD. The patient cohort was divided into two groups according to the median age (<57 years). Functional outcome was recorded using the Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ) allowing for qualitative self -assessment of the Constant, SPADI and Dark Scores.

Results

Median age was 57 (25 %–75 %: 48–63) years, follow-up was 55 (25 %–75 %: 25–87) months. In group I (age < 57 years, n = 165) no significant differences in outcome between physical therapy and ASD were detected. In contrast, in group II (age > 57 years; n = 142) the patients reported significantly better results after ASD in the overall MSQs.

Conclusion

Despite their higher age, elderly patients with isolated SI actually benefit significantly from ASD in comparison to physical therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klintberg IH, Svantesson U, Karlsson J (2010) Long-term patient satisfaction and functional outcome 8–11 years after subacromial decompression. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(3):394–403. doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0963-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC (2004) Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 63(4):335–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pope DP, Croft PR, Pritchard CM, Silman AJ (1997) Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition. Ann Rheum Dis 56(5):308–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Urwin M, Symmons D, Allison T, Brammah T, Busby H, Roxby M, Simmons A, Williams G (1998) Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation. Ann Rheum Dis 57(11):649–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Picavet HS, Schouten JS (2003) Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain 102(1–2):167–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Verhaar JA (2004) Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol 33(2):73–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, Rose P, Randall T, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (2006) Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45(2):215–221. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kei139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Neer CS (1972) Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54(1):41–50

    Google Scholar 

  9. Codman EA, Akerson IB (1931) The pathology associated with rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. Ann Surg 93(1):348–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozaki J, Fujimoto S, Nakagawa Y, Masuhara K, Tamai S (1988) Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(8):1224–1230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bjornsson H, Norlin R, Knutsson A, Adolfsson L (2010) Fewer rotator cuff tears fifteen years after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(1):111–115. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorrestijn O, Stevens M, Winters JC, van der Meer K, Diercks RL (2009) Conservative or surgical treatment for subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(4):652–660. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Arnala I, Nissinen M, Westenius H, Sintonen H, Aronen P, Konttinen YT, Malmivaara A, Rousi T (2009) Does arthroscopic acromioplasty provide any additional value in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome?: a two-year randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(10):1326–1334. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.91b10.22094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarvela S, Jarvela T, Aho H, Kiviranta I (2010) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: outcome comparison between outpatient and hospitalized patients with 2- to 5-year follow-up. Scand J Surg 99(1):50–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dom K, Van Glabbeek F, Van Riet RP, Verborgt O, Wuyts FL (2003) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for advanced (stage II) impingement syndrome: a study of 52 patients with five years follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg 69(1):13–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicholson GP (2003) Arthroscopic acromioplasty: a comparison between workers’ compensation and non-workers’ compensation populations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(4):682–689

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Burnet EN (2004) Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 17(2):152–164. doi:10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Braman J, Flatow E (2005) Arthroscopic decompression and physiotherapy have similar effectiveness for subacromial impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(11):2595. doi:10.2106/JBJS.8711.ebo2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirchhoff C, Braunstein V, Milz S, Sprecher CM, Fischer F, Tami A, Ahrens P, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2010) Assessment of bone quality within the tuberosities of the osteoporotic humeral head: relevance for anchor positioning in rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 38(3):564–569. doi:10.1177/0363546509354989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidutz F, Beirer M, Braunstein V, Bogner V, Wiedemann E, Biberthaler P (2012) The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patientreported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery. Patient Saf Surg 6(1):9. doi:10.1186/1754-9493-6-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gartsman GM, Blair ME Jr, Noble PC, Bennett JB, Tullos HS (1988) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression. An anatomical study. Am J Sports Med 16(1):48–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jerosch J, Wustner P (2002) Effect of a sensorimotor training program on patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Unfallchirurg 105(1):36–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Andersen NH, Sojbjerg JO, Johannsen HV, Sneppen O (1999) Self-training versus physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation of the shoulder in patients treated with arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a clinical randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(2):99–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Florian Schmidutz for his outstanding assistance throughout the pre-study and Wolf Mutschler for having created an excellent cluster with all possibilities to develop and conduct frontier science.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chlodwig Kirchhoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biberthaler, P., Beirer, M., Kirchhoff, S. et al. Significant benefit for older patients after arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a long-term follow-up study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 457–462 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1760-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1760-x

Keywords

Navigation