Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors associated with prolonged length of stay following a total knee replacement in patients aged over 75

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine factors associated with a prolonged length of stay (LOS) in patients over 75 undergoing a total knee replacement (TKR).

Methods

Patients over 75 undergoing a TKR at our institution from January 2008 to February 2009 were identified (n = 112). Patient and operative factors previously shown to affect length of stay were identified. Patient notes were reviewed for details on each of these and data analysed for their effect on length of stay. Discrete data were analysed for their effect on post-operative length of stay using either the Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskall-Wallis test and continuous data analysed with the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.

Results

The following factors were associated with length of stay at the 95 % confidence level: patient age, pre-operative mobility and the use of walking aids, BMI, whether the patient was able to mobilise within 24 or 48 hours of the surgery, the day on which the patient first walked ten metres and achieved 90° active knee flexion, pre and post-operative haemoglobin and the need for a blood transfusion.

Conclusions

Pre-operative use of walking aids, peri-operative haemoglobin concentration, failure to mobilise early following the operation and post-operative complications (including the need for a blood transfusion) seem to be the significant factors associated with a prolonged stay in hospital in the over 75 year olds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arden N, Nevitt MC (2006) Osteoarthritis: epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20:3–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hospital Episodes Statistics Online (2009) Hospital episode statistics. Http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk. Accessed 14 February 2012

  3. HM Treasury (2010) Budget 2010: Securing the recovery. Http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/budget2010.htm. Accessed 14 February 2012

  4. Kaye KS, Anderson DJ, Sloane R, Chen LF, Choi Y, Link K, Sexton DJ, Schmader KE (2009) The effect of surgical site infection on older operative patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:46–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Husted H, Holm G, Jacobsen S (2008) Predictors of length of stay and patient satisfaction after hip and knee replacement surgery: fast-track experience in 712 patients. Acta Orthop 79:168–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Husted H, Hansen HC, Holm G, Bach-Dal C, Rud K, Andersen KL, Kehlet H (2010) What determines length of stay after total hip and knee arthroplasty? A nationwide study in Denmark. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dauty M, Smitt X, Menu P, Dubois C (2009) Which factors affect the duration of inpatient rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty in the absence of complications? Ann Phys Rehabil Med 52:234–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook JR, Warren M, Ganley KJ, Prefontaine P, Wylie JW (2008) A comprehensive joint replacement program for total knee arthroplasty: a descriptive study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Namba RS, Paxton L, Fithian DC, Stone ML (2005) Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 20:46–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hewitt B, Shakespeare D (2001) Flexion vs. extension: a comparison of post-operative total knee arthroplasty mobilisation regimes. Knee 8:305–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandrasekaran S, Ariaretnam SK, Tsung J, Dickison D (2009) Early mobilization after total knee replacement reduces the incidence of deep venous thrombosis. ANZ J Surg 79:526–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Isaac D, Falode T, Liu P, I’Anson H, Dillow K, Gill P (2005) Accelerated rehabilitation after total knee replacement. Knee 12:346–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Larsen K, Sørensen OG, Hansen TB, Thomsen PB, Søballe K (2008) Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: a randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of follow-up. Acta Orthop 79:149–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paysant J, Jardin C, Biau D, Coudeyre E, Revel M, Rannou F (2008) What is the interest of early knee mobilization after total knee arthroplasty? Ann Readapt Med Phys 51:138–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosencher N, Ozier Y (2003) Peri-operative use of EPO. Transfus Clin Biol 10:159–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sasanuma H, Sekiya H, Takatoku K, Takada H, Sugimoto N, Hoshino Y (2011) Efficient strategy for controlling post-operative hemorrhage in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:921–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salido JA, Marín LA, Gómez LA, Zorrilla P, Martínez C (2002) Preoperative hemoglobin levels and the need for transfusion after prosthetic hip and knee surgery: analysis of predictive factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:216–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guerin S, Collins C, Kapoor H, McClean I, Collins D (2007) Blood transfusion requirement prediction in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Transfus Med 17:37–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Leach D, Bonfe M (2009) The effectiveness of femoral/sciatic nerve blocks on post-operative pain management in total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs 28:257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Duarte VM, Fallis WM, Slonowsky D, Kwarteng K, Yeung CKL (2006) Effectiveness of femoral nerve blockade for pain control after total knee arthroplasty. J Perianesth Nurs 21:311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Toftdahl K, Nikolajsen L, Haraldsted V, Madsen F, Tønnesen EK, Søballe K (2007) Comparison of peri- and intraarticular analgesia with femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Orthop 78:172–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rissanen P, Aro S, Paavolainen P (1996) Hospital- and patient-related characteristics determining length of hospital stay for hip and knee replacements. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 12:325–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Forrest G, Fuchs M, Gutierrez A, Girardy J (1998) Factors affecting length of stay and need for rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:186–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liebergall M, Soskolne V, Mattan Y, Feder N, Segal D, Spira S, Schneidman G, Stern Z, Israeli A (1999) Preadmission screening of patients scheduled for hip and knee replacement: impact on length of stay. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 7:17–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor Lee Shepstone of The University of East Anglia for his advice regarding statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikas Khanduja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raut, S., Mertes, S.C., Muniz-Terrera, G. et al. Factors associated with prolonged length of stay following a total knee replacement in patients aged over 75. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 1601–1608 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1538-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1538-1

Keywords

Navigation