Skip to main content
Log in

Initial stability of two different adhesives compared to suture repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture—A biomechanical evaluation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Treatment of acute subcutaneous Achilles tendon rupture remains challenging. Whereas the results of conservative and operative treatment are inconsistent, early mobilisation treatment seems to be beneficial. Besides suture repair, operative treatment using adhesives reveals promising results. Our hypothesis was that a gluing technique provides initial stability comparable to sutures.

Methods

In a biomechanical study, 18 fresh frozen sheep Achilles tendons were used to compare the biomechanical properties of suture repair using PDS® II and Bunnell’s technique to tendon gluing using BioGlue® and Tissucol®. Load to failure testing was performed.

Results

Ultimate failure loads of sutures (146.2 ± 30.8 N) are significantly superior to the techniques using BioGlue® (38.4 ± 18.3 N; p <0.0001) or Tissucol® (4.7 ± 2.5 N; p <0.0001). Interestingly, no significant differences in stiffness were found between the application of BioGlue® and PDS® II.

Conclusions

Suture repair provides significantly superior biomechanical properties compared to the use of both tested adhesives BioGlue® and Tissucol®. Based on the presented data we recommend the use of suture material for open Achilles tendon repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jozsa L, Kvist M, Balint BJ et al (1989) The role of recreational sport activity in Achilles tendon rupture. A clinical, pathoanatomical, and sociological study of 292 cases. Am J Sports Med 17:338–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moller A, Astron M, Westlin N (1996) Increasing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Scand 67:479–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hattrup SJ, Johnson KA (1985) A review of ruptures of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle 6:34–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leppilahti J, Puranen J, Orava S (1996) Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Scand 67:277–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cetti R, Henriksen LO, Jacobsen KS (1994) A new treatment of ruptured Achilles tendons. A prospective randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 308:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hohendorff B, Siepen W, Spiering L, Staub L, Schmuck T, Boss A (2008) Long-term results after operatively treated Achilles tendon rupture: fibrin glue versus suture. J Foot Ankle Surg 47:392–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, Crawford J, Brammar T, Parker M (2005) Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2202–2210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Majewski M, Rickert M, Steinbruck K (2000) Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective study assessing various treatment possibilities. Orthopade 29:670–676

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D et al (2010) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2767–2775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Olsson N, Nilsson-Helander K, Karlsson J et al (2011) Major functional deficits persist 2 years after acute Achilles tendon rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1385–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Keating JF, Will EM (2011) Operative versus non-operative treatment of acute rupture of tendon Achillis: A prospective randomised evaluation of functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1071–1078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nilsson-Helander K, Silbernagel KG, Thomee R et al (2010) Acute achilles tendon rupture: a randomized, controlled study comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments using validated outcome measures. Am J Sports Med 38:2186–2193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gwynne-Jones DP, Sims M, Handcock D (2011) Epidemiology and outcomes of acute Achilles tendon rupture with operative or nonoperative treatment using an identical functional bracing protocol. Foot Ankle Int 32:337–343

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paar O, Bernett P (1984) Therapy of Achilles tendon rupture in athletes. Advantages of fibrin gluing. Fortschr Med 102:1106–1108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Redaelli C, Niederhauser U, Carrel T, Meier U, Trentz O (1992) Rupture of the Achilles tendon—fibrin gluing or suture? Chirurg 63:572–576

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Winter U (1985) Treatment of fresh Achilles tendon ruptures with fibrin glue. Aktuelle Traumatol 15:219–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ambacher T, Kuhn P, Schmidt R, Disselhorst-Klug C, Paar O (2001) Muscle strength and functional results after surgical repair of Achilles tendon rupture with fibrin gluing. Zentralbl Chir 126:989–994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maffulli N, Tallon C, Wong J, Lim KP, Bleakney R (2003) Early weightbearing and ankle mobilization after open repair of acute midsubstance tears of the achilles tendon. Am J Sports Med 31:692–700

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yildirim Y, Esemenli T (2002) Initial pull-out strength of tendon sutures: an in vitro study in sheep Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int 23:1126–1130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zandbergen RA, de Boer SF, Swierstra BA, Day J, Kleinrensink GJ, Beumer A (2005) Surgical treatment of achilles tendon rupture: examination of strength of 3 types of suture techniques in a cadaver model. Acta Orthop 76:408–411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Herbort M, Haber A, Zantop T et al (2008) Biomechanical comparison of the primary stability of suturing Achilles tendon rupture: a cadaver study of Bunnell and Kessler techniques under cyclic loading conditions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1273–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Siddiqui F et al (2002) Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic overview and metaanalysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 400:190–200

    Google Scholar 

  23. McCoy BW, Haddad SL (2010) The strength of achilles tendon repair: a comparison of three suture techniques in human cadaver tendons. Foot Ankle Int 31:701–705

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mortensen HM, Skov O, Jensen PE (1999) Early motion of the ankle after operative treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon. A prospective, randomized clinical and radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:983–990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kangas J, Pajala A, Siira P, Hamalainen M, Leppilahti J (2003) Early functional treatment versus early immobilization in tension of the musculotendinous unit after Achilles rupture repair: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. J Trauma 54:1171–1180, discussion 1180–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kerkhoffs GM, Struijs PA, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK (2002) Functional treatment after surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: wrap vs walking cast. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:102–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Moller M, Movin T, Granhed H, Lind K, Faxen E, Karlsson J (2001) Acute rupture of tendon Achillis. A prospective randomised study of comparison between surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:843–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nistor L (1981) Surgical and non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:394–399

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cetti R, Christensen SE, Ejsted R, Jensen NM, Jorgensen U (1993) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 21:791–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Metz R, van der Heijden GJ, Verleisdonk EJ, Tamminga R, van der Werken C (2009) Recovery of calf muscle strength following acute achilles tendon rupture treatment: a comparison between minimally invasive surgery and conservative treatment. Foot Ankle Spec 2:219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Watson TW, Jurist KA, Yang KH, Shen KL (1995) The strength of Achilles tendon repair: an in vitro study of the biomechanical behavior in human cadaver tendons. Foot Ankle Int 16:191–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bosch P, Hertz H, Lintner F, Nowotny R (1981) Does the fibrin glue accelerate the healing of tendons? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 98:305–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Witter K, Tonar Z, Matejka VM et al (2010) Tissue reaction to three different types of tissue glues in an experimental aorta dissection model: a quantitative approach. Histochem Cell Biol 133:241–259

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Thelen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneppendahl, J., Thelen, S., Schek, A. et al. Initial stability of two different adhesives compared to suture repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture—A biomechanical evaluation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 627–632 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1357-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1357-9

Keywords

Navigation