Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical therapy of hip-joint empyema. Is the Girdlestone arthroplasty still up to date?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Hip-joint empyema is a severe local infection that can cause general illness and, in the worst-case scenario, death by septic complications. For severe hip-joint infections, the Girdlestone arthroplasty has been an established treatment option for many decades. We describe functional midterm results after treatment of haematological and postoperative hip-joint infections.

Methods

From 2000 to 2010, 24 patients underwent surgical treatment for 27 hip-joint empyemas. The surgical procedures included radical debridement, implantation of local antibiotic beads and soft tissue management. Besides clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters, we analysed the Harris hip score (HHS).

Results

Twenty-three patients (26 hips) were followed up after a mean of 30 (3.1–126.8) months. The study group consists of 12 men and 11 women, with an average height of 1.71 m, weight of 84.7 kg and body mass index (BMI) of 28.6 kg/m2. Hip-joint empyema was due to haematological septic spread in eight patients, surgery related in 12 hips and other causes in six cases. One patient died due to septic complications during the hospital stay. Intraoperative bacterial culture was positive in 50%, with Staphylococcus aureus as the most common organism (n = 11). Average hospital stay was 35 days. HHS significantly improved from 18.2 preoperatively to 47.8 at follow-up. Functional results were mainly poor, but pain relief increased significantly. The infection control rate was 96% with four (15%) complications.

Conclusion

Resection arthroplasty by Girdlestone is able to control infection in most cases with an acceptable complication rate but poor functional results. In conclusion, the Girdlestone arthroplasty still is an essential surgical strategy for treating hip-joint empyema in cases in which functional outcome is of lesser priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharma H, De Leeuw J, Rowley DI (2005) Girdlestone resection arthroplasty following failed surgical procedures. Int Orthop 29:92–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Castellanos J, Flores X, Llusa M, Chiriboga C, Navarro A (1998) The Girdlestone pseudarthrosis in the treatment of infected hip replacements. Int Orthop 22:178–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pohlemann T, Stengel D, Tosounidis G, Reilmann H, Stuby F, Stockle U, Seekamp A, Schmal H, Thannheimer A, Holmenschlager F, Gansslen A, Rommens PM, Fuchs T, Baumgartel F, Marintschev I, Krischak G, Wunder S, Tscherne H, Culemann U (2011) Survival trends and predictors of mortality in severe pelvic trauma: Estimates from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry Initiative. Injury

  4. Ho GJ (2001) Bacterial arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 13:310–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Esterhai JLJ, Gelb I (1991) Adult septic arthritis. Orthop Clin North Am 22:503–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Girdlestone GR (2008) Acute pyogenic arthritis of the hip: an operation giving free access and effective drainage. 1943. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:258–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Esenwein SA, Robert K, Kollig E, Ambacher T, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Muhr G (2001) Long-term results after resection arthroplasty according to Girdlestone for treatment of persisting infections of the hip joint. Chirurg 72:1336–1343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bourne RB, Hunter GA, Rorabeck CH, Macnab JJ (1984) A six-year follow-up of infected total hip replacements managed by Girdlestone's arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:340–343

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clegg J (1977) The results of the pseudarthrosis after removal of an infected total hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59:298–301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kent M, Rachha R, Sood M (2010) A technique for the fabrication of a reinforced moulded articulating cement spacer in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34:949–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haynes SR, Lawler PG (1995) An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation. Anaesthesia 50:195–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mader JT, Shirtliff M, Calhoun JH (1999) The host and the skeletal infection: classification and pathogenesis of acute bacterial bone and joint sepsis. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 13:1–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rittmeister ME, Manthei L, Hailer NP (2005) Prosthetic replacement in secondary Girdlestone arthroplasty has an unpredictable outcome. Int Orthop 29:145–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi HR, von Knoch F, Kandil AO, Zurakowski D, Moore S, Malchau H (2011) Retention treatment after periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty infection. Int Orthop http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1324-5

  16. Bohler M, Salzer M (1991) Girdlestone's modified resection arthroplasty. Orthopedics 14:661–666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grauer JD, Amstutz HC, O'Carroll PF, Dorey FJ (1989) Resection arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:669–678

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BG Trauma Hospital Hamburg, Septic Bone and Joint Surgery, Bergedorfer Straße 10, 21033, Hamburg, Germany

    Ralf Oheim, Justus Gille, Rita Schoop, Sonja Mägerlein, Cornelius H. Grimme, Christian Jürgens & Ulf-Joachim Gerlach

Authors
  1. Ralf Oheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Justus Gille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rita Schoop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sonja Mägerlein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cornelius H. Grimme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christian Jürgens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ulf-Joachim Gerlach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Oheim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oheim, R., Gille, J., Schoop, R. et al. Surgical therapy of hip-joint empyema. Is the Girdlestone arthroplasty still up to date?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 927–933 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1351-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1351-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation