Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of MRI in the diagnosis and management of patients with clinical scaphoid fracture

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The American College of Radiologists (ACR) recognises the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the investigation of choice in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture but normal plain radiographs. The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) in the UK produces no similar guidelines, as evidenced by the inconsistent management of such cases in hospitals around the UK. In discussion with our musculoskeletal radiologists, we implemented new guidelines to standardise management of our patients and now report our findings.

Methods

A consecutive series of 137 patients referred to the orthopaedic department with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture but normal series of plain radiographs were prospectively followed up over a two-year period. We implemented the use of early MRI for these patients and determined its incidence of detected scaphoid injury in addition to other occult injuries. We then prospectively examined results of these findings on patient management.

Results

Thirty-seven (27%) MRI examinations were normal with no evidence of a bony or soft-tissue injury. Soft-tissue injury was diagnosed in 59 patients (43.4%). Of those, 46 were triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears (33.8%) and 18 were intercarpal ligament injuries (13.2 %). Bone marrow oedema with no distinct fracture was discovered in 55 cases (40.4%). In 17 (12.5%) cases, this involved only the scaphoid. In the remainder, it also involved the other carpal bones or distal radius. Fracture(s) were diagnosed on 30 examinations (22.0%).

Conclusions

MRI should be regarded as the gold standard investigation for patients in whom a scaphoid fracture is suspected clinically. It allows the diagnosis of occult bony and soft-tissue injuries that can present clinically as a scaphoid fracture; it also helps exclude patients with no fracture. We believe that there is a need to implement national guidelines for managing occult scaphoid fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sonin AH, Rogers LF (1997) Skeletal Trauma. In: Grainger RG, Allison DJ (eds) Diagnostic Radiology, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingston, New York, pp 1573–1628

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leslie JJ, Dickson RA (1981) The fractured carpal scaphoid. Natural history and factors influencing outcome. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 63-B:225–230

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Waizenegger M, Barton NJ, Davis TR, Wastie ML (1994) Clinical signs in scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg (Br) 19:743–747

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter J, Escobedo E, Wilson AJ, Hanel DP, Zink-Brody GC, Mann FA (1997) MR imaging of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1287–1293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tiel-van Buul MMC, van Beek EJR, Broekhuizen AH et al (1993) Radiography and scintigraphy of suspected scaphoid fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75:61–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yao L, Lee JK (1988) Occult intraosseous fracture: detection with MR imaging. Radiology 167:749–751

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubin DA et al. (2007) American College of Radiologists Practice Guidelines for the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the wrist. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/dx/musc/mri_wrist.aspx

  8. Rubin DA et al. (2008) American College of Radiologists Appropriateness Criteria. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/pdf/ExpertPanelonMusculoskeletalImaging/AcuteHandandWristTraumaDoc1.aspx

  9. Brookes-Fazakerley SD, Kumar AJ, Oakley J (2009) Survey of the initial management and imaging protocols for occult scaphoid fractures in UK hospitals. Skeletal Radiol 38(11):1045–1048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beeres FJ, Hogervorst M, Rhemrev SJ, den Hollander P, Jukema GN (2007) A prospective comparison for suspected scaphoid fractures: bone scintigraphy versus clinical outcome. Injury 38(7):769–774, Epub 2007 Feb 20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beeres FJ, Rhemrev SJ, den Hollander P et al (2008) Early magnetic resonance imaging compared with bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(9):1205–1209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jenkins PJ, Slade K, Huntley JS, Robinson CM (2008) A comparative analysis of the accuracy, diagnostic uncertainty and cost of imaging modalities in suspected scaphoid fractures. Injury 39(7):768–774, Epub 2008 Jun 9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adey L, Souer JS, Lozano-Calderon S, Palmer W, Lee SG, Ring D (2007) Computed tomography of suspected scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg Am 32(1):61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, Wang XG (2010) Diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(3):723–734, Epub 2009 Sep 15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Breitenseher MJ, Metz VM, Gilula LA et al (1997) Radiographically occult scaphoid fractures: value of MR imaging in detection. Radiology 203:245–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gooding A, Coates M, Rothwell A (2004) Accident Compensation Corporation. Cost analysis of traditional follow-up protocol versus MRI for radiographically occult scaphoid fractures: a pilot study for the Accident Compensation Corporation. N Z Med J 117(1201):U1049, 10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen TB, Petersen RB, Barckman J, Uhre P, Larsen K (2009) Cost-effectiveness of MRI in managing suspected scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg Eur 34(5):627–630, Epub 2009 Aug 17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorsay TA (2001) Cost-effectiveness of immediate MR imaging versus traditional follow-up for revealing radiographically occult scaphoid fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1257–1263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brooks S, Cicuttini FM, Lim S, Taylor D, Stuckley SL, Wluka AE (2005) Cost effectiveness of adding magnetic resonance imaging to the usual management of suspected scaphoid fractures. Br J Sports Med 39:75–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Groves AM, Kayani I, Syed R, Hutton BF, Bearcroft PP, Dixon AK, Ell PJ (2006) An international survey of hospital practice in the imaging of acute scaphoid trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(6):1453–1456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Barts & The London NHS Trust, 59 Elmstead Lane, Chislehurst Kent, BR7 5EQ, UK

    Saket Tibrewal

  2. Barts & The London NHS Trust, Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1BB, UK

    Prakash Jayakumar, Sujit Vaidya & Swee Chai Ang

Authors
  1. Saket Tibrewal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prakash Jayakumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sujit Vaidya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Swee Chai Ang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saket Tibrewal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tibrewal, S., Jayakumar, P., Vaidya, S. et al. Role of MRI in the diagnosis and management of patients with clinical scaphoid fracture. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 107–110 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1350-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1350-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation