Abstract
Advances in surgical technique and implant technology have improved the ten-year survival after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite this, the number of revision procedures has been increasing in recent years, a trend which is predicted to continue into the future. Revision THA is a technically demanding procedure often complicated by a loss of host bone stock which may be compounded by the need to remove primary implants. Both cemented and uncemented implant designs are commonly used in the United Kingdom for primary and revision THA and much controversy still exists as to the ideal method of stem fixation. In this article we discuss revision of the femur using cemented components during revision THA. We focus on three clinical scenarios including femoral cement-in-cement revision where the primary femoral cement-bone interface remains well fixed, femoral cement-in-cement revision for peri-prosthetic femoral fractures, and femoral impaction grafting. We discuss the clinical indications, surgical techniques and clinical outcomes for each of these procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Joint Registryfor England and Wales. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=EuUKuR4jPyc%3d&tabid=86&mid=523. Accessed 16 November 2010
Greenwald AS, Narten NC, Wilde AH (1978) Points in the technique of recementing in the revision of an implant arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60(1):107–110
Li PL, Ingle PJ, Dowell JK (1996) Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty: should it be done? J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(5):809–811
Lieberman JR, Moeckel BH, Evans BG, Salvati EA, Ranawat CS (1993) Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(6):869–871
Rosenstein A, MacDonald W, Iliadis A, McLardy-Smith P (1992) Revision of cemented fixation and cementbone interface strength. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 206(1):47–49
Duncan WW, Hubble MJW, Howell JR, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ, Gie GA (2009) Revision of the femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(5):577–582
Ling RSM, Lee AJC, Gie GA, Timperley AJ, Hubble MJW, Howell JR, Whitehouse SL. The Exeter hip—40 years of innovation in total hip arthroplasty. Exeter Hip Publishing, Exeter, pp 283-294
Cement-in-cement short revision stem. Operative technique. Stryker Europe 2004. Literature EXEBR02E01. www.stryker.com
Marcos L, Buttaro M, Comba F, Piccaluga F (2009) Femoral cement within cement technique in carefully selected aseptic revision arthroplasties. Int Orthop 33(3):633–637
Briant-Evans TW, Veeramootoo D, Tsiridis E, Hubble MJW (2009) Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B peri-prosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. 3 year follow up of 23 cases. Acta Orthop 80(5):548–552
Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304
Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ (1993) Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:14–21
Schreurs BW, Arts JJ, Verdonschot N, Buma P, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW (2005) Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(11):2499–2507
Wraighte PJ, Howard PW (2008) Femoral impaction bone allografting with an Exeter cemented collarless, polished, tapered stem in revision hip replacement: a mean follow-up of 10.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(8):1000–1004
Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Ling RS (2003) Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6):809–817
Ornstein E, Linder L, Ranstam J, Lewold S, Eisler T, Torper M (2009) Femoral impaction bone grafting with the Exeter stem—the Swedish experience: survivorship analysis of 1,305 revisions performed between 1989 and 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(4):441–446
English H, Timperley AJ, Dunlop D, Gie G (2002) Impaction grafting of the femur in two-stage revision for infected total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(5):700–705
Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2008. Available online at: http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se/ Accessed 4 October 2010
Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(7):1487–1497
Mandziak DG, Howie DW, Neale SD, McGee MA (2007) Cement-within-cement stem exchange using the collarless polished double-taper stem. J Arthroplasty 22(7):1000–1006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holt, G., Hook, S. & Hubble, M. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 267–273 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1167-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1167-5