Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterior-only surgery with strong halo-femoral traction for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 100°

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of >100° via posterior-only surgery with strong halo-femoral traction and posterior wide release. From December 2003 to August 2006, 121 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were treated in our hospital; among them, 29 patients with curves over 100° were included in this study. From December 2003 to June 2005, group A included the first 12 patients who underwent combined anterior release followed by two-week halo-femoral traction and then posterior instrumentation. From July 2005 to August 2006, 17 patients in group B underwent posterior surgery alone with strong halo-femoral traction and posterior wide release. All of the patients were followed-up for a minimum of 31 months (mean, 36 months; range, 31–41 months). There were no severe complications. All of the patients achieved bony fusion without instrumentation breakage or pseudarthrosis. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in gender, age, type of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, preoperative coronal major curve values, major curve flexibility, or final follow-up major curve correction rate. The average operative time, blood loss and hospital stay in group B were less than those in group A. In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Cobb >100°, posterior-only surgery with strong halo-femoral traction and posterior wide release can provide comparable curve correction with shorter operative time, less blood loss and shorter hospital stay when compared to combined anteroposterior surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qiu Y, Zhu LH, Lv JY et al (2001) Surgical strategy and correction technique for scoliosis of more than 90°. Chin J Surg 39:102–105

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li M, Liu Y, Zhu XD et al (2004) Surgical results of one stage anterior release and posterior correction for treatment of severe scoliosis. Chin J Orthop (Chin) 24:271–275

    Google Scholar 

  3. Newton PO, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ et al (1997) Anterior release and fusion in pediatric spinal deformity. A comparison of early outcome and cost of thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy approaches. Spine 22:1398–1406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. King A, Mills T, Loe WA Jr et al (2000) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the prone position. Spine 25:2403–2406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Niemeyer T, Freeman F, Grevitt et al (2000) Anterior thoracoscopic surgery followed by posterior instrumentation and fusion in spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 9:499–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ et al (2006) Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90°. Spine 31:2386–2391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ et al (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1399–1405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liljenqvist U, Lepsien U, Hackenberg L et al (2002) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 11:336–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burton DC, Andrew AS, Marc AA et al (2005) The treatment of large (>70°) thoracic idiopathic scoliosis curves with posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis: when is anterior release indicated. Spine 17:1979–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang HQ, Lu SJ, Chen J et al (2007) Treatment of severe idiopathic scoliosis with wide posterior spinal release and 3D spinal correction. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord 17:274–279

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) 83:1169–1181

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2005) Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1534–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lenke LG, Newton PO, Marks MC et al (2004) Prospective pulmonary function comparison of open versus endoscopic anterior fusion combined with posterior fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2055–2060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vendantam R, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2000) A prospective evaluation of pulmonary function in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical approach used for spinal arthrodesis. Spine 25:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Halm H, Niemeyer T, Link T et al (2000) Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 9:191–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the Hunan Province Institute of Science and Technology (06SK3015) and the Health Department of Hunan Province of Scientific Researching Fund (B2006040). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-qi Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Hq., Wang, Yx., Guo, Cf. et al. Posterior-only surgery with strong halo-femoral traction for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 100°. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 1037–1042 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1111-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1111-8

Keywords

Navigation