Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-centre study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic, 1997–2007

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the epidemiological data of patients with hip fractures from 1997–2007. Adult patients treated for hip fracture between the years 1997–2007 were included in the study. Retrospective statistical assessment of continually gathered data focussed on epidemiology and demographics. The study involved 3,683 patients (2,678 women and 1,005 men). Patients older than 70 years accounted for 82% of all cases. There were 2.7 times more women; in patients younger than 60 years men significantly outnumbered women (p < 0.001). The mean patient age was 77.9 years (SD ± 12.6; women, 80.3 years; men, 71.5 years). There was a slight increase in the average age in both sexes. Trochanteric fractures accounted for 54.7% and femoral neck fractures accounted for 45.3% of fractures. The ratio of men to women was the same in femoral neck (AO-31B) and trochanteric (AO-31A) fractures. The average year-to-year increase in the number of fractures was 5.9%. For femoral neck fractures (AO-31B), there was a statistically insignificant increase in the number of fractures (p = 0.63); for intertrochanteric factures (AO-31A3) there was a statistically insignificant decrease (p = 0.65). There was an increase in the number of hip fractures resulting in a significant increase in pertrochanteric fractures (AO-31A1+2) (p < 0.001). The ratio of trochanteric to neck fractures increased from 0.99 to 1.53. Continual monitoring of patients with hip fracture offers data which allows comparisons between regions and countries. There has been a continual increase in the number of patients with hip fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melton LJ III, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL, Beckenbaugh RD (1982) Fifty year trend in hip fracture incidence. Clin Orthop 162:144–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Báča V, Kachlík D, Horák Z, Stingl J (2007) The course of osteons in the compact bone of the human proximal femur—morphological study with clinical and biomechanical notes. Surg Rad Anat 29:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartoníček J, Heřt J (2004) Outline of clinical anatomy of the musculoskeletal apparatus. Maxdorf, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koval KJ, Chen AL, Aharonoff GB, Egol KA, Zuckermann JD (2004) Clinical pathway for hip fractures in elderly. Clin Orthop 425:72–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melton LJ, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM (1999) Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates changes in urban rates over time. Osteoporos Int 9:29–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gregory JS, Testi D, Stewart A, Undrill PE, Reid DM, Aspden RM (2004) A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:5–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lešič A, Jarebinski M, Pekmezovič T, Bumbaširevič M, Spasovali D, Atkinson HD (2007) Epidemiology of hip fractures in Belgrade, Serbia Montenegro, 1990–2000. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:179–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang KP, Center JR, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2004) Incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology study. J Bone Miner Res 19:532–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ, Ishizuka T (1959) A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 41-A:1399–1408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lustenberger A, Ganz R (1995) Epidemiologie trochantärer Femurfrakturen über 2 Jahrzehnte (1972–1989). Unfallchirurg 98:278–282

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, Kniffin W, Malenka D, Mayor M, Keller RB (1996) Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 7:612–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cordey J, Schneider M, Bühler M (2000) The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur. Injury 31(suppl3):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gjertsen J-E, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Steindal K, Vinje T, Fevang MM (2008) The Norwegian hip fracture register. Acta Orthopaedica 79:583–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hedlund R, Ahlbom A, Lindgren U (1985) Hip fracture incidence in Stockholm 1972–1981. Acta Orthop Scand 57:30–34

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holt G, Smith R, Duncan K, Hutchison JD, Gregori A (2008) Gender differences in epidemiology and outcome after hip fracture: evidence from the Scottish hip fracture audit. J Bone Joint Surg 90-B:480–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smektala R, Ohmann C, Paech S, Neuhaus E, Rieger M, Schwabe W, Debold P, Deimling A, Jonas M, Hupe K, Bücker-Nott HJ, Giani G, Szucs TD, Pientka L (2005) Zur Prognose der Schenkelhalsfraktur. Beurteilung der Mortalität nach Schenkelhalsfraktur durch sektorübergreifende Datenzusammenführung. Unfallchirurg 108:927–937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bartoníček J, Šprindrich J, Skála-Rosenbaum J, Frič V (2007) Diagnosing occult pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur with MRI. Rozhl Chir 86:379–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts SE, Goldacre MJ (2003) Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968–98: database study. Br Med J 327:771–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schürch M-A, Rizzoli R, Mermillod B, Vasey H, Michel JP, Bonjour J-P (1996) A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Mineral Research 11(12):1935–1942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Džupa V, Bartoníček J, Skála-Rosenbaum J (1999) Analysis of group of patients treated in 1997 for proximal femur fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traum Cech 66:235–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wallöe A, Andersson S, Herrlin K, Lidgren L (1983) Incidence and stability of trochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 54:622–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aharonoff GB, Dennis MG, Elshinawy A, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ (1998) Circumstances of falls causing hip fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop 348:10–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Caniggia M, Morreale P (1989) Epidemiology of hip fractures in Siena, Italy, 1975–1985. Clin Orthop 238:131–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chariyalertsak S, Suriyawongpisal P, Thakkinstain A (2001) Mortality after hip fractures in Thailand. Int Orthop 25:294–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Endo Y, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Egol KA, Koval KJ (2005) Gender differences in patients with hip fracture: a greater risk of morbidity and mortality in men. J Orthop Trauma 19:29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S, Wingstrand H (2007) Risk of mortality following hip fracture in Japan. J Orthop Sci 12:113–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kurup HV, Mehta RL (2006) The male neck of femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:181–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Moran CG, Wenn RT, Taylor A (2005) Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important? J Bone Joint Surg 87-A:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cumming RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (1997) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Epidemiol Rev 19:244–257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. de Deuxchaisnes CN, Devogelaer J-P (1988) Letter to editor: Increase in incidence of hip fractures and of the ratio of trochanteric to cervical hip fractures in Belgium. Calcif Tissue Int 42:201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Finsen V, Johnsen LG, Trano G, Hansen B, Sneve KS (2004) Hip fracture incidence in central Norway: a followup study. Clin Orthop 419:173–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cornwall R, Gilber MS, Koval KJ, Strauss E, Siu AL (2004) Functional outcomes and mortality vary among different types of hip fractures. Clin Orthop 425:64–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanis JA (1993) The incidence of hip fracture in Europe. Osteoporosis Int 3(suppl1):10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Escobar L, Escobar R, Cordero-Ampuero J (2006) Previous medical problems in 326 consecutive hip fracture patients. Hip Int 16:57–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin KH, Lim YW, Wu YJ, Lam KS (2005) Mortality after proximal hip fracture in the Singapore population. Hip Int 15:166–170

    Google Scholar 

  36. Balk R, Hahn F, Tarcea B (2002) Die proximale Femurfraktur. Häufigkeit, Demographie, Etiologie, Prophylaxe. OP-Journal 17:80–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Baudoin C, Fardellone P, Sebert J-L (1993) Effect of sex and age on ratio of cervical to trochanteric hip fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 64:647–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Black DM, Cooper C (2000) Epidemiology of fractures and assessment of fracture risk. Clin Lab Med 20:439–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vaculík J, Malkus T, Majerníček M, Podškubka A, Dungl P (2007) Incidence of proximal femoral fractures. Ortopedie 1:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  40. Deakin DE, Boulton C, Moran CG (2007) Mortality and causes of death among patients with isolated limb and pelvic fractures. Injury 38:312–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gdalevich M, Cohen D, Yosef D, Tauber C (2004) Morbidity and mortality after hip fracture: the impact of operative delay. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:334–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nydegger V, Rizzoli R, Rapin C-H, Vasey H, Bonjour J-P (1991) Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur in Geneva: incidence, clinical and social aspects. Osteoporosis Int 2:42–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hagino T, Maekawa S, Sato E, Bando K, Hamada Y (2006) Prognosis of proximal femoral fractures in patients aged 90 years and older. J Orthop Surg 14:122–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zain Elabdien BS, Olerud S, Karlström G (1984) The influence of age on the morphology of trochanteric fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:156–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cooper C (1993) The epidemiology of fragility fractures: is there a role for bone quality? Calcif Tissue Int 53(suppl1):23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hansson LI, Ceder L, Svensson K, Thorngren K-L (1982) Incidence of fractures of the distal radius and proximal femur. Acta Orthop Scand 53:721–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum.

Additional information

This article is original, it is not under consideration by another journal, and it has not been previously published. None of the authors or the departments with which they are affiliated has received something of value from a commercial or other party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. The publication has been approved by all co-authors, as well as by the responsible authorities at the institute where the work has been carried out. There are no conflicts and no disclosures within the manuscript files. The publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skála-Rosenbaum, J., Bartoníček, J., Říha, D. et al. Single-centre study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic, 1997–2007. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 587–593 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-0984-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-0984-x

Keywords

Navigation