Skip to main content
Log in

Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We measured bone density (BD) changes to assess adaptive bone remodelling five years after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with taper-design femoral component using quantitative computed-tomography-assisted osteodensitometry (qCT). Nineteen consecutive patients (21 hips) with degenerative joint disease were enrolled in the study. A press-fit cup and a tapered uncemented stem ceramic−ceramic pairing were used in all patients. Serial clinical, radiological and qCT osteodensitometry assessments were performed after the index operation and at the one, two and five year follow-ups. At the latest follow-up, the clinical outcome was rated satisfactory in all hips. The radiological assessment showed signs of osteointegration with stable fixation of all cups and stems. Overall, there was evidence of a BD loss at year five (p = 0.004). We estimate that BD loss was between 2.2% and 12.1% in comparison with baseline postoperative values. Progressive loss of BD in the metaphyseal region was observed in all hips. We found unremarkable BD changes of diaphyseal cortical BD throughout the five year follow-up period. qCT osteodensitometry technology allows differentiation of cortical and cancellous BD changes over time. Periprosthetic BD changes at the five year follow-up are suggestive of stable stem osteointegration with proximal femoral diaphysis load transfer and metaphyseal stress shielding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Digas G, Kaerrholm J (2008) Five-year DEXA study of 88 hips with cemented femoral stem. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-008-0699-4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:45–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibbons CE, Davies AJ, Amis AA, Olearnik H, Parker BC, Scott JE (2001) Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy. Int Orthop 25:89–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M (1989) Adaptive bone remodelling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 12:1255–1267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laine HJ, Puolakka TJ, Moilanen T, Pajamaki KJ, Wirta J, Lehto MU (2000) The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on ‘fit-and-fill’ characteristics and on bone remodeling. Int Orthop 24:184–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leali A, Fetto JF (2004) Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem. Int Orthop 28:151–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martini F, Sell S, Kremling E, Kusswetter W (1996) Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems. Int Orthop 20:218–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Niinimaki T, Junila J, Jalovaara P (2001) A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. Int Orthop 25:85–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandit S, Graydon A, Bradley WC, Munro J, Pitto RP (2006) CT-osteodensitometry in modern uncemented taper-design stem with hydroxyapatite coating. Australia-NZ J of Surg 76:778–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pitto RP, Bhargava A, Pandit S, Walker C, Munro JT (2008) Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:589–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pitto RP, Mueller L, Reilly K, Schmidt R, Munro J (2007) Quantitative computer assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31:431–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M (1999) Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop 23:325–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Lewallen DG, Harmsen WS, Harrington J, Cabanela ME (2004) Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem. Int Orthop 28:206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt R, Nowak TE, Mueller L, Pitto RP (2004) Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem. Int Orthop 28:74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt R, Pitto RP, Kress A, Ehremann C, Nowak TE, Reulbach U, Forst R, Muller L (2005) Inter- and Intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. Arch Ortho Trauma Surg 125:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Scott DF, Jaffe WL (1996) Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years. J Arthroplasty 11:429–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shim V, Pitto RP, Streicher RM, Hunter PJ, Anderson IA (2007) The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating FE models of the femur and pelvis. J of Biomechanics 40:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber D, Pomeroy DL, Brown R, Schaper LA, Badenhausen WE Jr, Smith W, Curry JI, Suthers KE (2000) Proximally porous coated femoral stem in total hip replacement−5- to 13-year follow-up report. Int Orthop 24:97–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zerahn B, Lausten GS, Kanstrup IL (2004) Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems. Int Orthop 28:146–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Garnet Tregonning, Dr. Jacob Munro, Dr. Lyndon Bradley, Dr. Godwyn Choy, Dr. Andrew Graydon, Dr. Melissa Rossaak and Dr. Keryn Reilly for their assistance during the clinical follow-ups.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rocco P. Pitto.

Additional information

This study was supported by an educational grant from the Stevenson Charitable Trust, New Zealand, and was partially funded by DePuy Int., Leeds, UK

This study was approved by the local Ethical Board Review Committee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pitto, R.P., Hayward, A., Walker, C. et al. Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 783–787 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0884-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0884-0

Keywords

Navigation