Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective study of surgical delay for hip fractures: impact of an orthogeriatrician and increased trauma capacity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most health services in the United Kingdom provide unacceptable in-hospital care for hip fracture patients. We describe the impact on surgical delay following the introduction of an orthogeriatrician and the addition of one extra trauma list per week at our centre. Prospective data were collected on 101 consecutive patients followed by a second cohort of 105 patients. Mean time to surgery in cohorts 1 and 2 was 4.08 and 4.05 days, respectively (p = 0.71). Diagnosis of medical comorbidity increased with input from the orthogeriatrician from 69.7% to 74.2% (p = 0.24). Length of stay and mortality were comparable in the two groups. A full trauma list accounted for the most frequent orthopaedic delay, which decreased from 18.1% to 12.9% (p = 0.09). Increased recognition of medical comorbidity has financial implications for hospital remuneration. However, lack of orthopaedic provisions accounts for significant avoidable surgical delay requiring further investment if national standards are to be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit (2007) National Report: National Clinical Audit of Falls and Bone Health in Older People, Royal College of Physicians. Available via DIALOG. http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/college/ceeu/fbhop/fbhop-nationalreport.pdf. Accessed 3 Jun 2009

  2. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ III (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: A worldwide projection. Osteoporos Int 2(6):285–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA (1993) Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ 307:1248–1250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moran CG, Wenn RT, Sikand M et al (2005) Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:483–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roche JJW, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG (2005) Effect of co-morbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 331(7529):1374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts SE, Goldacre MJ (2003) Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968–98. BMJ 327:771–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barnes R, Brown JT, Garden RS, Nicholl EA (1997) Subcapital fractures of the femur: A prospective review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 58(1):2–24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Keller MS (1995) Early fixation reduces morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures from low-impact falls. J Trauma 39(2):261–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sebestyén A, Boncz I, Sándor J, Nyárády J (2008) Effect of Surgical delay on early mortality in patients with femoral neck fracture. Int Orthop 32(3):375–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jamal Sepah Y, Umer M, Khan A, Ullah Khan Niazi A (2009) Functional outcome, mortality and in-hospital complications of operative treatment in elderly patients with hip fractures in the developing world. Int Orthop May 28 (Epub ahead of print)

  11. Royal College of Physicians (1989) Fractured neck of femur. Prevention and management. Summary and recommendations of a report of the Royal College of Physicians. J R Coll Physicians Lond 23:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. British Orthopaedic Association Blue book (2007) The care of patients with fragility fracture. Available via DIALOG. http://www.boa.ac.uk. Accessed 21 Mar 2009

  13. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2002) The prevention and management of hip fracture in older people. SIGN, Edinburgh. Available via DIALOG. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign56. Accessed 21 Mar 2009

  14. Lawrence TM, White CT, Wenn R, Moran CG (2005) The current hospital costs of treating hip fractures. Injury 36:88–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen L, Lee JAY, Chua BSY, Howe T (2007) Hip fractures in the elderly: The impact of comorbid illnesses on hospitalisation costs. Ann Acad Med Singapore 36:784–787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cameron ID, Handoll HHG, Finnegan TP, Madhok R, Langhorne P (2001) Co-ordinated multidisciplinary approaches for inpatient rehabilitation of older patients with femoral neck fractures. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester

  17. Beaupre LA, Jones CA, Saunders LD, Johnston DW, Buckingham J, Majumdar SR (2005) Best practices for elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic overview of the evidence. J Gen Intern Med 20(11):1019–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hempsall VJ, Robertson DR, Campbell MJ, Briggs RS (1990) Orthopaedic geriatric care—is it effective? A prospective population-based comparison of outcome in fractured neck of femur. J R Coll Physicians Lond 24(1):47–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan R, Fernandez C, Kashifl F, Shedden R, Diggory P (2002) Combined orthogeriatric care in the management of hip fractures: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:122–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Naglie G, Tansey C, Kirkland JL et al (2002) Interdisciplinary inpatient care for elderly people with hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 167(1):25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Phy MP, Vanness DJ, Melton LJ III, Long KH et al (2005) Effects of a hospitalist model on elderly patients with hip fracture. Arch Intern Med 165(7):796–801

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adunsky A, Lusky A, Arad M, Heruti RJ (2003) A comparative study of rehabilitation outcomes of elderly hip fracture patients: the advantage of a comprehensive orthogeriatric approach. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58(6):542–547

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vidan M, Serra JA, Moreno C, Riquelme G et al (2005) Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(9):1476–1482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khasraghi FA, Christmas C, Lee EJ, Mears SC, Wenz JF Sr (2005) Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team approach to hip fracture management. J Surg Orthop Adv 14(1):27–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoenig H, Rubenstein LV, Sloane R, Horner R, Kahn K (1997) What is the role of timing in the surgical and rehabilitative care of community-dwelling older persons with acute hip fracture? Arch Intern Med 10;157(5):513–520

    Google Scholar 

  26. Siegmeth AW, Gurusamy K, Parker MJ (2005) Delay to surgery prolongs hospital stay in patients with fractures of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(8):1123–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the trauma nurse practitioners Jenny Currie and Lorraine Sanderson at Chesterfield Royal Hospital for their valued assistance in data collection during the study.

No financial support was received as part of this study

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Chadwick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marsland, D., Chadwick, C. Prospective study of surgical delay for hip fractures: impact of an orthogeriatrician and increased trauma capacity. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 1277–1284 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0868-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0868-0

Keywords

Navigation