Skip to main content
Log in

The diagnostic value of needle biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of imaging-guided core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal lesions. Between 2004 and 2007, 309 biopsies (ultrasound 151, computed tomography 89, and fluoroscopy 69) were included. There were 142 soft tissue and 167 bony lesions. Diagnostic yields and accuracies were assessed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test with Bonferroni’s correction when necessary. Overall diagnostic yield was 90.6% for all 309 lesions (bone 91.6% vs. soft tissue 89.3%, p = 0.5125). The diagnostic accuracy of the 185 core needle biopsies, which were confirmed by definitive surgical biopsies, was 84.3% (bone 88.9% vs. soft tissue 79.1%, p = 0.0669). The yields of homogenous bone tumours (96.8%) were not significantly higher than those of bone tumours with a heterogenic architecture (86.4%, p = 0.0794). The difference between accuracies for homogenous bone tumours (89.1%) and heterogenous bone tumours (85.0%) was not significant (p = 0.6930). However, for soft tissue tumours, homogenous tumours had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than heterogenous tumours (97.5% vs. 81.4%, p = 0.0036). Diagnostic accuracy for homogenous tumours was also significantly higher than that for heterogenous soft tissue tumours (94.4% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.0001). The image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions is a safe and effective procedure if it is performed selectively in soft tissue tumours with homogenous architectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitsuyoshi G, Naito N, Kawai A et al (2006) Accurate diagnosis of musculoskeletal lesions by core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol 94:21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mankin HJ, Mankin CJ, Simon MA (1996) The hazards of the biopsy, revisited. Members of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78:656–663

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kilpatrick SE, Cappellari JO, Bos GD, Gold SH, Ward WG (2001) Is fine-needle aspiration biopsy a practical alternative to open biopsy for the primary diagnosis of sarcoma? Experience with 140 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 115:59–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Skrzynski MC, Biermann JS, Montag A, Simon MA (1996) Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Jt Surg [Am] 78-A:644–649

    Google Scholar 

  5. Altuntas AO, Slavin J, Smith PJ et al (2005) Accuracy of computed tomography guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. ANZ J Surg 75:187–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Preteseille O, Barral FG, Court L et al (2003) Value of percutaneous core needle biopsy in the investigation of a suspected bone tumor. J Radiol 84:693–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Issakov J, Flusser G, Kollender Y, Merimsky O, Lifschitz-Mercer B, Meller I (2003) Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for bone and soft tissue tumors. Isr Med Assoc J 5:28–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Torriani M, Etchebehere M, Amstalden E (2002) Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of bone and soft tissue tumors. J Ultrasound Med 21:275–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeow KM, Tan CF, Chen JS, Hsueh C (2000) Diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasound-guided needle biopsy in soft tissue masses about superficial bone lesions. J Ultrasound Med 19:849–855

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Welker JA, Henshaw RM, Jelinek J, Shmookler BM, Malawer MM (2000) The percutaneous needle biopsy is safe and recommended in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal masses. Cancer 89:2677–2686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yao L, Nelson SD, Seeger LL, Eckardt JJ, Eilber FR (1999) Primary musculoskeletal neoplasms: effectiveness of core-needle biopsy. Radiology 212:682–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dupuy DE, Rosenberg AE, Punyaratabandhu T, Tan MH, Mankin HJ (1998) Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:759–762

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Logan PM, Connell DG, O'Connell JX, Munk PL, Janzen DL (1996) Image-guided percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors: an algorithm for selection of specific biopsy techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:137–141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu JS, Goldsmith JD, Horwich PJ, Shetty SK, Hochman MG (2008) Bone and soft-tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core-needle biopsy? Radiology 248:962–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Werner M (2006) Giant cell tumour of bone: morphological, biological and histogenetical aspects. Int Orthop 30(6):484–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stoker DJ, Cobb JP, Pringle JA (1991) Needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. A review of 208 procedures. J Bone Jt Surg Br 73:498–500

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Contreras O, Burdiles A (2006) Diagnosis of bone lesions using image guided percutaneous biopsy. Rev Med Chil 134:1283–1287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawai A, Taguchi K, Sugihara S, Kunisada T, Inoue H (1996) The value of needle biopsy in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors. Int J Clin Oncol 1:35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jelinek JS, Murphey MD, Welker JA et al (2002) Diagnosis of primary bone tumors with image-guided percutaneous biopsy: experience with 110 tumors. Radiology 223:731–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Konermann W, Wuisman P, Ellermann A, Gruber G (2000) Ultrasonographically guided needle biopsy of benign and malignant soft tissue and bone tumors. J Ultrasound Med 19:465–471

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McCarthy EF (2007) CT-guided needle biopsies of bone and soft tissue tumors: a pathologist's perspective. Skeletal Radiol 36:181–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saifuddin A, Mitchell R, Burnett SJ, Sandison A, Pringle JA (2000) Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of primary bone tumours. J Bone Jt Surg Br 82:50–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ayala AG, Zornosa J (1983) Primary bone tumors: percutaneous needle biopsy. Radiologic-pathologic study of 222 biopsies. Radiology 149:675–679

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hodge JC (1999) Percutaneous biopsy of the musculoskeletal system: a review of 77 cases. Can Assoc Radiol J 50:121–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fraser-Hill MA, Renfrew DL (1992) Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. 1. Effective accuracy and diagnostic utility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:809–812

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (1999) Recommendations for reporting soft tissue sarcomas. Am J Clin Pathol 111:594–598

    Google Scholar 

  27. Layfield LJ, Glasgow BJ, Anders KH, Mirra JM (1987) Fine needle aspiration cytology of primary bone lesions. Acta Cytol 31:177–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-Wook Seo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sung, KS., Seo, SW. & Shon, MS. The diagnostic value of needle biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 1701–1706 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0835-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0835-9

Keywords

Navigation