Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional outcome, mortality and in-hospital complications of operative treatment in elderly patients with hip fractures in the developing world

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hip fracture has been increasing in frequency for several decades, and 70–90% of patients who sustain a hip fracture survive for at least one year. Many of these survivors fail to regain their prefracture functional status. No work in this regard has been done in the developing world. Elderly patients with acute intertrochanteric fracture and fracture of the femoral neck were followed up prospectively for 12 months after surgery to record the mortality, morbidity, functional status and complications. Three hundred and forty-five patients (61% female) were assessed at six and 12 months after surgery, which included 62.9% intertrochanteric fractures and 37% femoral neck fractures. The mechanism of injury was from a fall in 67% of the cases. Nineteen patients died within six months after surgery while another eight died during the next six months. Obesity, male gender, multiple comorbidities and below normal ambulation status before fracture were identified as major determinants of bad functional outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arinzon Z, Fidelman Z, Zuta A, Peisakh A, Berner YN (2005) Functional recovery after hip fractures in old-old elderly patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 40:327–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chariyalertsak S, Suriyawongpisal P, Thakkinstain A (2001) Mortality after hip fractures in Thailand. Int Orthop 25:294–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper C (2007) The crippling consequences of hip fractures and the impact on quality of life. Am J Med 103:2S–17S

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cornwall R, Gilbert M, Koval KJ, Strauss E, Siu AL (2004) Functional outcomes and mortality vary among different types of hip fractures: a function of patient characteristics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:64–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heikkinen T, Parker M, Jalovaara P (2001) Hip fractures in Finland and Great Britain—a comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes. Int Orthop 25:349–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrera A, Martinez AA, Ferrandez L, Gil E, Moreno A (2006) Epidemiology of osteoporotic hip fractures in Spain. Int Orthop 30:11–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnley J (1972) The long term results of low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54B:61–76

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katz S, Akpom CA (1976) Index of ADL. Med Care 14(supp 5):116–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moayyeri A, Soltani A, Larijani B, Naghavi M, Alaeddini F, Abolhassani F (2006) Epidemiology of hip fracture in Iran: results from the Iranian Multicenter Study on Accidental Injuries. Osteoporos Int 17:1252–1257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD (1994) Functional recovery after fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:751–758

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD (1998) Hip fractures are an increasingly important public health problem. Clin Orthop 348:2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD (1994) Hip fractures. Overview and evaluation and treatment of femoral neck fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:141–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morris AH, Zuckerman JD (2002) National consensus conference on improving the continuum of care for patients with hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(4):670–674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsson LE, Karlsson J, Ekman I (2006) The integrated care pathway reduced the number of hospital days by half: a prospective comparative study of patients with acute hip fracture. J Orthop Surg Res 1:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Owen W, Flets J, Spitznagel E (1978) ASA physical status classification : a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosell PAE, Parker MJ (2003) Functional outcome after hip fracture. A 1 year prospective outcome study of 275 patients. Int J Care Injured 34:529–532

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rowe SM, Yoon TR, Ryang DH (1993) An epidemiological study of hip fracture in Honam, Korea. Int Orthop 17:139–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:457–467

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. White BL, Fisher WD, Laurin CA (1987) Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980's. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1335–1340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization (2008) World Health Statistics 2008. Available at http://www.who.int/countries/pak/en/. Accessed 28 January 2009

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masood Umer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamal Sepah, Y., Umer, M., Khan, A. et al. Functional outcome, mortality and in-hospital complications of operative treatment in elderly patients with hip fractures in the developing world. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 431–435 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0803-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0803-4

Keywords

Navigation