Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reconstruction of large defects in vertebral osteomyelitis with expandable titanium cages

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome of expandable titanium cage implantation in large defects caused by acute vertebral osteomyelitis. Twenty-five patients with acute single or multilevel spondylodiscitis were treated after radical débridement and posterior instrumentation with an anterior expandable titanium cage and bone grafting. Clinical, laboratory and radiological follow-up continued for 36 months. Within the postoperative course there was no recurrence of spinal infection. The final radiological examination showed successful fusion in all cases without implant loosening or failure. At the final follow-up after 36 months the Oswestry Disability Index was 23 ± 14 and the pain visual analogue scale 2.1 ± 1.7. This study reveals healing and improved function after expandable titanium cage implantation in all patients. Prerequisites for optimal healing include radical débridement, provision of stability for weight-bearing, adequate bone grafting and correction of deformity using rigid implants.

Résumé

Le but de cette étude est d’analyser le devenir des cages titane expansibles implantées dans le cas de perte de substances osseuses aiguës vertébrales après ostéomyélite. Matériel et méthode: 25 patients présentant une spondylodiscite à un ou plusieurs niveaux ont été traités. Après mise à plat, instrumentation postérieure, mise en place d’une cage antérieure expansible et greffe, les patients ont été suivis pendant 36 mois sur le plan clinique, biologique et radiologique. Résultats: il n’y a pas eu de récidive de l’infection. Le résultat radiologique a montré une bonne fusion dans tous les cas sans descellement ou échec de l’implant. Au suivi final de 36 mois, l’index d’Oswestry est de 23 ± 14 et l’échelle douloureuse visuelle analogique est de 2.1 ± 1.7. En conclusion, cette étude permet de montrer que ces cages autorisent une cicatrisation et une amélioration de la fonction chez ces patients. Néanmoins, il est nécessaire pour obtenir ce résultat de réaliser une mise à plat, d’adapter la remise en charge, de faire une greffe également adaptée et de corriger les déformations par une instrumentation rigide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aryan HE, Lu DC, Acosta FL Jr, Ames CP (2007) Corpectomy followed by the placement of instrumentation with titanium cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for vertebral osteomyelitis. J Neurosurg Spine 6:23–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fayazi AH, Ludwig SC, Dabbah M, Bryan Butler R, Gelb DE (2004) Preliminary results of staged anterior debridement and reconstruction using titanium mesh cages in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine J 4:388–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gibson MJ, Karpinski MRK, Slack RCB, Cowlishaw WA, Webb JK (1987) The penetration of antibiotics into the normal intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:784–786

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ha KY, Chung YG, Ryoo SJ (2005) Adherence and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis on various spinal implants. Spine 30:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ha KY, Shin JH, Kim KW, Na KH (2007) The fate of anterior autogenous bone graft after anterior radical surgery with or without posterior instrumentation in the treatment of pyogenic lumbar spondylodiscitis. Spine 32:1856–1864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto AJ (2000) Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine 25:1668–1679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heyde CE, Boehm H, El Saghir H, Tschoke SK, Kayser R (2006) Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis in the cervical spine: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 15:1380–1387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klöckner C, Valencia R (2003) Sagittal alignment after anterior debridement and fusion with or without additional posterior instrumentation in the treatment of pyogenic and tuberculous spondylodiscitis. Spine 28:1036–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Koureas G, Iliopoulos P, Zacharatos S (2006) One-stage combined surgery with mesh cages for treatment of septic spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:51–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Koureas G, Iliopoulos P, Zacharatos S (2006) Anterior surgery with insertion of titanium mesh cage and posterior instrumented fusion performed sequentially on the same day under one anesthesia for septic spondylitis of thoracolumbar spine: is the use of titanium mesh cages safe? Spine 31:1014–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Bell RS, Moquin RR, Rosner MK (2006) Single-stage treatment of pyogenic spinal infection with titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lerner T, Schulte T, Bullmann V, Schneider M, Hackenberg L, Liljenqvist U (2006) Anterior column reconstruction using titanium ring cages in severe vertebral osteomyelitis. Eur J Trauma 32:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McGuire RA, Eismont FJ (1994) The fate of autogenous bone graft in surgically treated pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. J Spinal Disord 7:206–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ozturk C, Aydinli U, Vural R, Sehirlioglu A, Mutlu M (2007) Simultaneous versus sequential one-stage combined anterior and posterior spinal surgery for spinal infections (outcomes and complications). Int Orthop 31:363–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson Y, Reinke M, Kayser R, Ertel W, Heyde CE (2007) Postoperative multisegmental lumbar discitis treated by staged ventrodorsoventral intervention. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 8:529–534

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson Y, Tschöke SK, Finke T, Kayser R, Ertel W, Heyde CE (2008) Successful treatment of spondylodiscitis using titanium cages. Acta Orthop (in press)

  17. Ruf M, Stoltze D, Merk HR, Ames M, Harms J (2007) Treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis by radical debridement and stabilization using titanium mesh cages. Spine 32:E275–E280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shad A, Shariff S, Fairbank J, Byren I, Teddy PJMAD, Cadoux-Hudson TAD (2003) Internal fixation for osteomyelitis of cervical spine: the issue of persistence of culture positive infection around the implants. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145:957–960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stoltze D, Harms J (1999) Correction of posttraumatic deformities. Principles and methods (in German). Orthopade 28:731–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tali ET (2004) Spinal infections. Eur J Radiol 50:120–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tay BKB, Deckey J, Hu SS (2002) Spinal infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:188–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ulmar B, Richter M, Kelsch G, Cakir B, Puhl W, Huch K (2005) Distractible vertebral body replacement for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Acta Orthop Belg 71:467–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wlodarski KH, Galus R (2005) Histological aspects of bone fracture healing. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 7:351–360

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph E. Heyde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, Y., Tschoeke, S.K., Kayser, R. et al. Reconstruction of large defects in vertebral osteomyelitis with expandable titanium cages. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 745–749 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0567-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0567-2

Keywords

Navigation