Skip to main content
Log in

Autotransfusion drains in total knee replacement. Are they alternatives to homologous transfusion?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prospectively randomised 104 consecutive patients undergoing primary cemented total knee arthroplasty into two groups of 52 patients each, with one group to receive a standard suction drain (Redivac) and the other, an autologous transfusion drain (Bellovac). Randomisation was achieved using the software programme MINIM, which was set to randomly allocate patients to either of the two groups based on their age, sex and body mass index (BMI). All procedures were performed under pneumatic tourniquet. Drains were released in the recovery room 20 min after surgery and removed 24 h following surgery. Blood collected in the standard suction drain (control group) was discarded, while blood collected in the autologous transfusion drains (study group) was transfused unwashed back to the patient within 6 h of collection. Thirteen patients (25%) in the study group had two or more units of homologous blood transfused in addition to the blood collected postoperatively and re-transfused (average: 438 ml). Twelve patients (23%) in the control group had two or more units of homologous blood transfused. No sepsis, transfusion reactions or coagulopathies were associated with the autologous blood transfused in the study group. The use of the autologous transfusion system (Bellovac) proved to be safe but failed to reduce the need for postoperative homologous blood transfusion following uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty.

Résumé

Nous avons étudié, de façon prospective randomisée, 104 patients consécutifs ayant bénéficié d’une prothèse totale du genou cimentée. Chaque patient a reçu soit un drain aspiratif standard (Redivac) soit un drain permettant une retransfusion (Bellovac). 52 patients ont été randomisés dans chaque groupe à l’aide d’un programme software avec une excellente concomitance entre l’âge, le sexe et le BMI. Toutes les interventions ont été réalisées avec garrot. Les drains ont été mis en aspiration en salle de réveil, 20 minutes après la fin de l’acte chirurgical. Ces drains ont été ôtés 24 heures après la chirurgie. Le sang collecté dans le drain standard a été rejeté alors que le drain Bellovac a permis de récupérer le sang, le retransfuser sans lavage six heures après l’intervention. 39 patients (25%) dans le groupe standard ont eu deux, ou plus de deux, unités sanguines de transfusion en plus du sang récupéré dans le drain (438 ml en moyenne). 12 patients (23%) dans le groupe contrôle ont eu deux, ou plus de deux, transfusions. Il n’y a pas eu d’infection, de réaction sanguine après ré-infusion du sang du redon. L’utilisation d’un système de réutilisation du sang de type Bellovac n’entraîne pas de problèmes particuliers mais il ne permet pas de diminuer la nécessité de transfusions post-opératoires après une prothèse totale du genou standard sans complication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adalberth G, Bystrom S, Kolstad K, Mallmin H, Milbrink J (1998) Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary. A randomised study of 90 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 69:475–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Breakwell LM, Getty CJM, Dobson P (2000) The efficacy of autologous blood transfusion in bilateral total knee Arthroplasty. Knee 7:145–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carson JL, Chen AY (1998) In search of transfusion trigger. Clin Orthop 357:30–35, Dec

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clements DH, Sculco TP, Burke SW, Mayer K, Levine DB (1992) Salvage and reinfusion of postoperative sanguineous wound drainage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:646–651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Esler CNA, Blakeway C, Fiddian NJ (2003) The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:215–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans SJW, Day SJ, Royston P (1990) MINIM: minimisation programme for allocating patients to treatment in clinical trials. Unpublished document. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The London Hospital Medical College, London

  7. Faris PH, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Valeri CR (1991) Unwashed filtered shed blood collected after knee and hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1169–1178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Friederichs MG, Mariani EM, Bourne MH (2002) Perioperative blood salvage as an alternative to predonating blood for primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Groh GI, Buchert PK, Allen WC (1990) A comparison of transfusion requirements after total knee Arthroplasty using the Solcotrans autotransfusion system. J Arthroplasty 5:281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Han CD, Shin DE (1997) Postoperative blood salvage and reinfusion after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:511–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Healy WL, Pfeifer BA, Kurtz SR, Johnson C, Johnson W, Johnston R, Sanders D, Karpman R, Hallack GN, Valeri R (1994) Evaluation of autologous shed blood for autotransfusion after orthopaedic surgery. Clinic Orthop 299:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holt BT, Parks NL, Engh GA, Lawrence JM (1997) Comparison of closed-suction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee Arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 20:1121–1125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kristensen PW, Sorensen LS, Thyregod HC (1992) Autotransfusion of drainage blood in atrhroplasty. A prospective, controlled study of 31 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 63:377–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marks RM, Vaccaro LR, Balderston RA, Hozack WJ, Booth RE, Rothman RH (1995) Postoperative blood salvage in total knee arthroplasty using the Solcotrans autotransfusion system. J Arthroplasty 10:433–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Newman JH, Bowers M, Murphy J (1997) The clinical advantages of autologous transfusion. A randomised, controlled study after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:630–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Peter VK, Radford M, Matthews MG (2001) Re-transfusion of autologous blood from wound drains: the means for reducing transfusion requirements in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 8:321–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1994) Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:35–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Simpson MB, Murphy KP, Chambers HG, Bucknell AL (1994) The effect of postoperative drainage reinfusion in reducing the need for blood transfusion in elective total joint arthroplasty. A prospective randomised study. Orthopaedics 17:133–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sinha A, Sinha M, Burgert S (2001) Reinfusion of drained blood as an alternative to homologous blood transfusion after total knee replacement. Int Orthop 25:257–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to Mrs Pamela Coward (Research Nurse) for her contribution to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Abuzakuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abuzakuk, T., Senthil Kumar, V., Shenava, Y. et al. Autotransfusion drains in total knee replacement. Are they alternatives to homologous transfusion?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 31, 235–239 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0159-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0159-y

Keywords

Navigation