Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase II clinical trial of ex vivo-expanded cytokine-induced killer cells therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Second-line chemotherapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer has shown disappointing survival outcomes due to rapid disease progression and performance deterioration. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adoptive immunotherapy using ex vivo-expanded, cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who showed disease progression during gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. For generation of CIK cells, peripheral blood samples were collected from each patient and cultured with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody and IL-2. Patients received CIK cells intravenously 10 times, every week for 5 weeks and then every other week for 10 weeks. Twenty patients were enrolled between November 2009 and September 2010. The disease control rate was 25 % (4/16 patients). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.0 weeks (95 % CI 8.8–13.2), and the median overall survival (OS) was 26.6 weeks (95 % CI 8.6–44.6). Grade 3 toxicities included general weakness in two patients and thrombocytopenia in one patient. Grade 4 hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity was not observed. Patients showed improvement in pancreatic pain, gastrointestinal distress, jaundice, body image alterations, altered bowel habits, health satisfaction, and sexuality when assessing quality of life (QoL). Adoptive immunotherapy using CIK cells showed comparable PFS and OS to survival data of previous trials that assessed conventional chemotherapies while maintaining tolerability and showing encouraging results in terms of patient QoL in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer (clinicalTrials.gov number NCT00965718).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CIK cells:

Cytokine-induced killer cells

CA 19-9:

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9

CIs:

Confidence intervals

DCR:

Disease control rate

ECOG-PS:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status

EORTC:

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

FACS:

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

INR:

International normalized ratio

ITT:

Intention-to-treat

MHC:

Major histocompatibility complex

OFF:

Oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and 5-FU

OS:

Overall survival

PBMCs:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PD:

Progressive disease

PFS:

Progression-free survival

PP:

Per-protocol

QLQ-C30:

Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30

QLQ-PAN26:

Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 in patients with pancreatic cancer

QoL:

Quality of life

SD:

Stable disease

VAS:

Visual analog scale

References

  1. National Cancer Information Center (2013) Cancer Information Service National Cancer Information Center. http://www.cancer.go.kr/mbs/cancer/subview.jsp?id=cancer_040201000000. Accessed 12 Aug 2013

  2. Geer RJ, Brennan MF (1993) Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 165:68–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Colucci G, Labianca R, Di Costanzo F, Gebbia V, Cartenì G, Massidda B et al (2010) Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study. J Clin Oncol 28:1645–1651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, Figer A, Hecht JR, Gallinger S et al (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Cutsem E, Vervenne WL, Bennouna J, Humblet Y, Gill S, Van Laethem J et al (2009) Phase III trial of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2231–2237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Philip PA, Benedetti J, Corless CL, Wong R, O’Reilly EM, Flynn PJ et al (2010) Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205. J Clin Oncol 28:3605–3610

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pelzer U, Schwaner I, Stieler J, Adler M, Seraphin J, Dörken B et al (2011) Best supportive care (BSC) versus oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (OFF) plus BSC in patients for second-line advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III-study from the German CONKO-study group. Eur J Cancer 47:1676–1681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin J, Joo KM, Lee SJ, Jo M, Kim Y, Jin Y et al (2011) Synergistic therapeutic effects of cytokine-induced killer cells and temozolomide against glioblastoma. Oncol Rep 25:33–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mesiano G, Todorovic M, Gammaitoni L, Leuci V, Giraudo Diego L, Carnevale Schianca F et al (2012) Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells as feasible and effective adoptive immunotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors. Expert Opin Biol Ther 12:673–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hontscha C, Borck Y, Zhou H, Messmer D, Schmidt-Wolf IG (2011) Clinical trials on CIK cells: first report of the international registry on CIK cells (IRCC). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:305–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt Wolf IG, Negrin RS, Kiem HP, Blume KG, Weissman IL (1991) Use of a SCID mouse/human lymphoma model to evaluate cytokine-induced killer cells with potent antitumor cell activity. J Exp Med 174:139–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim HM, Lim J, Yoon YD, Ahn JM, Kang JS, Lee K et al (2007) Anti-tumor activity of ex vivo expanded cytokine-induced killer cells against human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int Immunopharmacol 7:1793–1801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim HM, Lim J, Park S, Kang JS, Lee CW, Lee KH et al (2007) Antitumor activity of cytokine-induced killer cells against human lung cancer. Int Immunopharmacol 7:1802–1807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sekine T, Shiraiwa H, Yamazaki T, Tobisu K, Kakizoe T (1993) A feasible method for expansion of peripheral blood lymphocytes by culture with immobilized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody and interleukin-2 for use in adoptive immunotherapy of cancer patients. Biomed Pharmacother 47:73–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun Z, Shi L, Zhang H, Shao Y, Wang Y, Lin Y et al (2011) Immune modulation and safety profile of adoptive immunotherapy using expanded autologous activated lymphocytes against advanced cancer. Clin Immunol 138:23–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fitzsimmons D, Johnson CD, George S, Payne S, Sandberg AA, Bassi C et al (1999) Development of a disease specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer QoL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 35:939–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, Rusch V, Jaques D, Budach V et al (2003) CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 13:176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boeck S, Weigang Köhler K, Fuchs M, Kettner E, Quietzsch D, Trojan J et al (2007) Second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed after gemcitabine failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II trial. Ann Oncol 18:745–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Demols A, Peeters M, Polus M, Marechal R, Gay F, Monsaert E et al (2006) Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II study. Br J Cancer 94:481–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kulke MH, Blaszkowsky LS, Ryan DP, Clark JW, Meyerhardt JA, Zhu AX et al (2007) Capecitabine plus erlotinib in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:4787–4792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oh SY, Kim HJ, Kim TH, Lee G, Jeong C, Kwon H et al (2010) Pilot study of irinotecan/oxaliplatin (IROX) combination chemotherapy for patients with gemcitabine- and 5-fluorouracil-refractory pancreatic cancer. Invest New Drugs 28:343–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Reilly EM, Niedzwiecki D, Hall M, Hollis D, Bekaii Saab T, Pluard T et al (2010) A Cancer and Leukemia Group B phase II study of sunitinib malate in patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (CALGB 80603). Oncologist 15:1310–1319

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ko AH, Tempero MA, Shan YS, Su WC, Lin YL, Dito E et al (2013) A multinational phase 2 study of nanoliposomal irinotecan sucrosofate (PEP02, MM-398) for patients with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 109:920–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zabernigg A, Giesinger JM, Pall G, Gamper EM, Gattringer K, Wintner LM et al (2012) Quality of life across chemotherapy lines in patients with cancers of the pancreas and biliary tract. BMC Cancer 12:390

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ly LV, Sluijter M, Versluis M, Luyten GP, van Stipdonk MJ, van der Burg SH et al (2010) Peptide vaccination after T-cell transfer causes massive clonal expansion, tumor eradication, and manageable cytokine storm. Cancer Res 70:8339–8346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Takayama T, Sekine T, Makuuchi M, Yamasaki S, Kosuge T, Yamamoto J et al (2000) Adoptive immunotherapy to lower postsurgical recurrence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet 356:802–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Si Young Song.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 713 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, M.J., Park, J.Y., Bang, S. et al. Phase II clinical trial of ex vivo-expanded cytokine-induced killer cells therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 63, 939–946 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-014-1566-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-014-1566-3

Keywords

Navigation