Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intradermal DNA electroporation induces survivin-specific CTLs, suppresses angiogenesis and confers protection against mouse melanoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Survivin is an intracellular tumor-associated antigen that is broadly expressed in a large variety of tumors and also in tumor associated endothelial cells but mostly absent in differentiated tissues. Naked DNA vaccines targeting survivin have been shown to induce T cell as well as humoral immune responses in mice. However, the lack of epitope-specific CD8+ T cell detection and modest tumor protection observed highlight the need for further improvements to develop effective survivin DNA vaccination approaches. Here, the efficacy of a human survivin DNA vaccine delivered by intradermal electroporation (EP) was tested. The CD8+ T cell epitope surv20–28 restricted to H-2 Db was identified based on in-silico epitope prediction algorithms and binding to MHC class I molecules. Intradermal DNA EP of mice with a human survivin encoding plasmid generated CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses cross-reactive with the mouse epitope surv20–28, as determined by intracellular IFN-γ staining, suggesting that self-tolerance has been broken. Survivin-specific CTLs displayed an activated effector phenotype as determined by CD44 and CD107 up-regulation. Vaccinated mice displayed specific cytotoxic activity against B16 and peptide-pulsed RMA-S cells in vitro as well as against surv20–28 peptide-pulsed target cells in vivo. Importantly, intradermal EP with a survivin DNA vaccine suppressed angiogenesis in vivo and elicited protection against highly aggressive syngeneic B16 melanoma tumor challenge. We conclude that intradermal EP is an attractive method for delivering a survivin DNA vaccine that should be explored also in clinical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altieri DC (2008) Survivin, cancer networks and pathway-directed drug discovery. Nat Rev Cancer 8:61–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adida C, Crotty PL, McGrath J et al (1998) Developmentally regulated expression of the novel cancer anti-apoptosis gene survivin in human and mouse differentiation. Am J Pathol 152:43–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ambrosini G, Adida C, Altieri DC (1997) A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma. Nat Med 3:917–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Velculescu VE, Madden SL, Zhang L et al (1999) Analysis of human transcriptomes. Nat Genet 23:387–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamoto H, Ngan CY, Monden M (2008) Cancer cells survive with survivin. Cancer Sci 99:1709–1714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Altieri DC (2006) Targeted therapy by disabling crossroad signaling networks: the survivin paradigm. Mol Cancer Ther 5:478–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Connor DS, Schechner JS, Adida C et al (2000) Control of apoptosis during angiogenesis by survivin expression in endothelial cells. Am J Pathol 156:393–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersen MH, Pedersen LO, Capeller B et al (2001) Spontaneous cytotoxic T-cell responses against survivin-derived MHC class I-restricted T-cell epitopes in situ as well as ex vivo in cancer patients. Cancer Res 61:5964–5968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rohayem J, Diestelkoetter P, Weigle B et al (2000) Antibody response to the tumor-associated inhibitor of apoptosis protein survivin in cancer patients. Cancer Res 60:1815–1817

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiang R, Mizutani N, Luo Y et al (2005) A DNA vaccine targeting survivin combines apoptosis with suppression of angiogenesis in lung tumor eradication. Cancer Res 65:553–561

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeis M, Siegel S, Wagner A et al (2003) Generation of cytotoxic responses in mice and human individuals against hematological malignancies using survivin-RNA-transfected dendritic cells. J Immunol 170:5391–5397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurunathan S, Klinman DM, Seder RA (2000) DNA vaccines: immunology, application, and optimization. Annu Rev Immunol 18:927–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Luxembourg A, Evans CF, Hannaman D (2007) Electroporation-based DNA immunisation: translation to the clinic. Expert Opin Biol Ther 7:1647–1664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicolas JF, Guy B (2008) Intradermal, epidermal and transcutaneous vaccination: from immunology to clinical practice. Expert Rev Vaccines 7:1201–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Biragyn A, Schiavo R, Olkhanud P et al (2007) Tumor-associated embryonic antigen-expressing vaccines that target CCR6 elicit potent CD8+ T cell-mediated protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity. J Immunol 179:1381–1388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roos AK, Moreno S, Leder C et al (2006) Enhancement of cellular immune response to a prostate cancer DNA vaccine by intradermal electroporation. Mol Ther 13:320–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Decker WK, Qiu J, Farhangfar F et al (2006) A retrogen plasmid-based vaccine generates high titer antibody responses against the autologous cancer antigen survivin and demonstrates anti-tumor efficacy. Cancer Lett 237:45–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lladser A, Parraga M, Quevedo L et al (2006) Naked DNA immunization as an approach to target the generic tumor antigen survivin induces humoral and cellular immune responses in mice. Immunobiology 211:11–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu K, Qin H, Cha SC et al (2007) Survivin DNA vaccine generated specific antitumor effects in pancreatic carcinoma and lymphoma mouse models. Vaccine 25:7955–7961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karre K, Ljunggren HG, Piontek G et al (1986) Selective rejection of H-2-deficient lymphoma variants suggests alternative immune defence strategy. Nature 319:675–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parker KC, Bednarek MA, Coligan JE (1994) Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J Immunol 152:163–175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh H, Raghava GP (2003) ProPred1: prediction of promiscuous MHC Class-I binding sites. Bioinformatics 19:1009–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rammensee H, Bachmann J, Emmerich NP et al (1999) SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics 50:213–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagaraj S, Pisarev V, Kinarsky L et al (2007) Dendritic cell-based full-length survivin vaccine in treatment of experimental tumors. J Immunother 30:169–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Townsend A, Ohlen C, Foster L et al (1989) A mutant cell in which association of class I heavy and light chains is induced by viral peptides. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 54(Pt 1):299–308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dong Y, Qian J, Ibrahim R et al (2006) Identification of H-2Db-specific CD8+ T-cell epitopes from mouse VEGFR2 that can inhibit angiogenesis and tumor growth. J Immunother 29:32–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mrass P, Kinjyo I, Ng LG et al (2008) CD44 mediates successful interstitial navigation by killer T cells and enables efficient antitumor immunity. Immunity 29:971–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ciesielski MJ, Kozbor D, Castanaro CA et al (2008) Therapeutic effect of a T helper cell supported CTL response induced by a survivin peptide vaccine against murine cerebral glioma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 57:1827–1835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vertuani S, Triulzi C, Roos AK et al (2008) HER-2/neu mediated down-regulation of MHC class I antigen processing prevents CTL-mediated tumor recognition upon DNA vaccination in HLA-A2 transgenic mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58(5):653–664

    Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen MH, Soerensen RB, Becker JC et al (2006) HLA-A24 and survivin: possibilities in therapeutic vaccination against cancer. J Transl Med 4:38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Blanc-Brude OP, Mesri M, Wall NR et al (2003) Therapeutic targeting of the survivin pathway in cancer: initiation of mitochondrial apoptosis and suppression of tumor-associated angiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 9:2683–2692

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tuting T, Gambotto A, DeLeo A et al (1999) Induction of tumor antigen-specific immunity using plasmid DNA immunization in mice. Cancer Gene Ther 6:73–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Conrad H, Gebhard K, Kronig H et al (2008) CTLs directed against HER2 specifically cross-react with HER3 and HER4. J Immunol 180:8135–8145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Related results have been presented previously in a preliminary form at the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research “Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives”. December 2–5, 2008, Miami, FL, USA. Research described here has been supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Medical Research Council, the Cancer Society of Stockholm, the European Union (Grants “EUCAAD” and “DC-THERA”), the Karolinska Institutet, “ALF-Project” grants from the Stockholm City Council (to RK), as well as the ICGEB (International Center of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy) grant CRP/CH102-01, Wellcome Trust award WT06491I/Z/01/Z and FONDAP grant 15010006 (to AFGQ). AL has been supported by President of the Republic International Fellowship for Postgraduate Studies, CONICYT Ph.D. Fellowship award, MECESUP Fellowship awards UCH9903 and UCH0306. KL has been supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Swedish Society for Medical Research.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. AKR is an employee at Cyto Pulse Sciences Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvaro Lladser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lladser, A., Ljungberg, K., Tufvesson, H. et al. Intradermal DNA electroporation induces survivin-specific CTLs, suppresses angiogenesis and confers protection against mouse melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 59, 81–92 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-009-0725-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-009-0725-4

Keywords

Navigation