Abstract
To evaluate ultrasound (US) versus conventional plain film radiography (CPF) in the detection of pneumoperitoneum, 30 patients with postsurgical pneumoperitoneum and a control group of 22 patients were studied using US and CPF. Sonograms and radiograms were obtained while patients were supine and in left lateral decubitus. The two orthogonal plain films of the abdomen were acquired with a horizontal X-ray beam. The epigastric region and right hypochondrium were investigated with ultrasonography. Four experienced, blinded radiologists examined 160 sonograms and 104 radiograms. Statistical analysis yielded a sensitivity of 75.7% for radiography versus 86% for ultrasonography, a specificity of 89.2% versus 83.5%, an accuracy of 81.5% versus 85%, a positive predictive value of 90.2% versus 87%, and a negative predictive value of 76.2% versus 83.5%, respectively. US could therefore be considered a reliable alternative imaging technique in the detection of pneumoperitoneum.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rice RP, Thompson WM, Gedgaudas RK. The diagnosis and significance of extraluminal gas in the abdomen. Radiol Clin North Am 1982;20:819–837
Madura MJ, Craig RM, Shields TW. Unusual causes of spontaneous pneumoperitoneum. Surg Gynecol Obstetr 1982;154:417–420
Menuck L, Siemers PT. Pneumoperitoneum: importance of right upper quadrant features. AJR 1976;127:753–756
Frimann-Dahl JC. Roentgen examination in acute abdominal diseases, 2d ed. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas, 1960
Frimann-Dahl JC. The acute abdomen. In: Margulis AR, Burhenne HJ, eds. Alimentary tract radiology. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1973:173
Nahum H, Geindre M, Bigot JM, et al. Traite de radiodiagnostic. In: Nahum H, Marsault C, Girault MJ, eds. Radiologie des occlusions intestinales. Paris: Masson, 1982:13
Frassineti A. La radiologia dell’addome acuto postoperatorio. Padua: Piccin, 1982
Miller RE, Decker GJ, Slabaugh RD. Detection of pneumoperitoneum: optimum body, position and respiratory phase. AJR 1980;135:487–490
Beyer D, Modder U. Diagnostic imaging of the acute abdomen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988
Cho KC, Baker SR. Extraluminal air: diagnosis and significance. Radiol Clin North Am 1994;32:829–844
Sanders RC. Atlas of ultrasonographic artifacts and variants. Chicago: Y.B.M.P., 1986
Kremkau FW, Taylor KJW. Artifacts in ultrasound imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:227–237
Chin-Sin C-C, Hsien-Hong L, Cho-Li Y et al. Sonographic demonstration of free air in perforated peptic ulcers: comparison of sonography with radiography. J Clin Ultrasound 1989;17:95–100
Dong HL, Jae HL, Young TK, et al. Sonographic detection of pneumoperitoneum in patients with acute abdomen. AJR 1990;154:107–109
Greenstein AJ, Mann D, Sachar DB, et al. Free perforation in Crohn’s disease: I. A survey of 99 cases. Am J Gastroenterol 1985;80:682–689
Nirapathpongporn S, Ostavanichvong K, Udompanich O, et al. Pneumoperitoneum detected by ultrasound. Radiology 1984;150:831–832
Braccini G, Battolla L, Boraschi P, et al. US versus plain radiography in pneumoperitoneum detection. Radiology 1992;185(P) (Suppl):145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braccini, G., Lamacchia, M., Boraschi, P. et al. Ultrasound versus plain film in the detection of pneumoperitoneum. Abdom Imaging 21, 404–412 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900092
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900092