Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) is considered to be quite rare, but the frequency is increasing given the increasing number of cesarean sections being performed, along with increased detection due to widespread use of early endovaginal sonography. The normal sonographic and magnetic resonance findings of this phenomenon will be discussed, including the appearance of complications associated with abnormal placentation, such as the placenta accreta spectrum. Cases of CSEP at our institution will be illustrated, along with clinical presentations and treatment outcomes.

Methods

The study included women who were diagnosed with a CSEP in the first trimester, which was confirmed by ultrasound. The clinical presentations, imaging findings, and treatment outcomes of these pregnancies were recorded.

Results

In our series, treatment ranged from no intervention with fetal demise on short-term follow-up ultrasound to viable near-term deliveries requiring cesarean section, urgent blood products, and emergent surgery. The majority of our cases 75 % (15 of 20) underwent successful early first trimester termination by a combination of systemic methotrexate administration, ultrasound-guided injection of embryocidal agents, and/or surgery.

Conclusion

Early imaging recognition and diagnosis of CSEP is critically important to minimize maternal complications, maintain treatment options, and potentially preserve future fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. (2003) First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine caesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:220–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, et al. (2012) The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:44.e1–44.e13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M (2006) Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol 107:1373–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. (2004) Caesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D (2007) Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG 114:253–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Osborn DA, Williams TR, Craig BM (2012) Cesarean scar pregnancy: sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, and treatment. J Ultrasound Med 31(9):1449–1456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen T (2008) Placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy: overlooked costs of the rising cesarean section rate. Clin Perinatol 35:519–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McKenna DA, Poder L, Goldman M, et al. (2008) Role of sonography in recognition, assessment and treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 27:779–783

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim PS, Greenberg M, Edelson MI, et al. (2011) Utility of ultrasound and MRI in prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol 197(6):1506–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baughman WC, Cortville JE, Shah RR (2008) Placenta accreta: spectrum of US and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 28(7):1905–1916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lax A, Prince MR, Mennitt KW, Schwebach JR, Budorick NE (2007) The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of suspected placental invasion. Magn Reson Imaging 25:87–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben Nagi J, Helmy S, Ofili-Yebovi D, et al. (2007) Reproductive outcomes of women with a previous history of Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Hum Reprod 22(7):2012–2015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kung FT, Lin H, Hsu TY, et al. (2004) Differential diagnosis of suspected cervical pregnancy and conservative treatment with the combination of laparoscopy-assisted uterine artery ligation and hysteroscopic endocervical resection. Fertil Steril 81:1642–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin EP, Bhatt S, Dogra VS (2008) Diagnostic clues to ectopic pregnancy. Radiographics 28:1661–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, et al. (2004) Ectopic pregnancies in a caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication. Hum Reprod Update 10:515–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P (2000) Pregnancy in a caesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:592–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadeghi H, Rutherford T, Rackow B, et al. (2010) Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: case series and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 27:111–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yela AA, Marchiani N (2013) Conservative management of ectopic pregnancy in cesarean scar: case report. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 35:233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Uysal F, Uysal A, Adam G (2013) Cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis, management, and follow-up. J Ultrasound Med 32:1295–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu H, Leng J, Shi H, Lang J (2010) Expectant treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: two cases reports and a glimpse at the natural courses. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:455–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong SC, Lau MS, Yam PK (2011) Ectopic pregnancy in previous caesarean section scar. Singapore Med J 52:e115–e117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kutuk MS, Uysal G, Dolanbay M, Ozgun MT (2014) Successful medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies with systemic multi-dose methotrexate: single-center experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40:1700–1706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang JH, Xu KH, Lin J, Xu JY, Wu RJ (2009) Methotrexate therapy for cesarean section scar pregnancy with and without suction curettage. Fertil Steril 92:1208–1213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lian F, Wang Y, Chen W, et al. (2012) Uterine artery embolization combined with local methotrexate and systemic methotrexate for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with different ultrasonographic pattern. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:286–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravhon A, Ben-Chetrit A, Rabinowitz R, et al. (1997) Successful methotrexate treatment of a viable pregnancy in a thin uterine scar. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:628–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shufaro Y, Nadjari M (2001) Implantation of a gestational sac in a cesarean section scar. Fertile Steril 75:1217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flystra DL, Pound-Chang T, Miller MG, et al. (2002) Ectopic pregnancy within a caesarean delivery scar: a case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:302–304 (35)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fylstra DL (2002) Ectopic pregnancy within a caesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 57:537–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cok T, Kalayci H, Ozdemir H (2015) Transvaginal ultrasound-guided local methotrexate administration as the first-line treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: follow-up of 18 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 41(5):803–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peng P, Gui T, Liu X (2015) Comparative efficacy and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in cesarean scar pregnancy. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:137–142

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R (2012) The diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(1):44.e1–44.e13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hasewaga J, Izuka K, Matsuoka R, et al. (2005) Limitations of conservative treatment for repeat caesarean scar pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:310–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stevens EE, Ogburn P (2011) Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report of failed combination local and systemic methotrexate management requiring surgical intervention. J Reprod Med 56:356–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brasic N, Warden M, Vargas JE (2013) Conservative management of cesarean scar pregnancy with sonographically guided transvaginal methotrexate injection. J Ultrasound Med 32:1061–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang J, Xu K, Lin J, et al. (2009) Methotrexate therapy for caesarean section scar pregnancy with or without suction curettage. Fertile Steril 92:1208–1213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shao MJ, Hu M, Hu MX (2013) Conservative management of cesarean scar pregnancy by local injection of ethanol under hysteroscopic guidance. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 121:281–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen L, Tan A, Zhu H, et al. (2012) Bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization with methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:386.e1–386.e6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Takeda A, Koyama K, Imoto S, et al. (2010) Diagnostic multimodal imaging and therapeutic transcatheter arterial chembolization for conservative management of hemorrhagic caesarean scar pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 152(2):152–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pyra K, Wozniak S, Szkodziak P, et al. (2012) Uterine artery embolisation in massive vaginal bleeding in ectopic pregnancy: case report. Przegl Lek 69:399–401

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu X, Zhang X, Zhu J, et al. (2012) Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 161:75–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li C, Li C, Feng D, et al. (2011) Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus systemic methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 113:178–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Deans R, Abbot J (2010) Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Fertile Steril 93:1735–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chao A, Wang TH, Wang CJ, et al. (2005) Hysteroscopic management of caesarean scar pregnancy after unsuccessful methotrexate treatment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:374–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Robinson J, Dayal M, Gindoff P, Frankfurter D (2009) A novel surgical treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy: laparoscopically assisted operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 92:1497.e13–1497.e16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Valley MT, Pierce JG, Daniel TB, Kaunitz AM (1998) Cesarean scar pregnancy: imaging and treatment with a conservative surgery. Obstet Gynecol 91:838–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kang S, Park B, Kim Y, Ro D (2011) Surgical management of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: hysterotomy by transvaginal approach. Fertil Steril 96:e25–e28 (64)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. He M, Chen MH, Xie HZ, et al. (2011) Transvaginal removal of ectopic pregnancy tissue and repair of uterine defect for caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG 118:1136–1139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Le A, Shan L, Xiao T, et al. (2013) Transvaginal surgical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287:791–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA

    Rehan M. Riaz, Todd R. Williams, Brian M. Craig & Daniel T. Myers

Authors
  1. Rehan M. Riaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Todd R. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brian M. Craig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel T. Myers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rehan M. Riaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riaz, R.M., Williams, T.R., Craig, B.M. et al. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. Abdom Imaging 40, 2589–2599 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0472-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0472-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation