Skip to main content
Log in

Use of CT and MRI in emergency department patients with acute pancreatitis

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Assess the utility of CT and MRI in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) presenting to emergency department (ED).

Materials and Methods

In this Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study, we identified all patients with AP from March 2012 through February 2013 in ED of a teaching hospital with approximately 60,000 annual visits. Patients were initially identified via ICD-9 code for AP (577.0); diagnosis was confirmed by chart review using established diagnostic criteria (presence of two of the following: typical abdominal pain, elevated lipase/amylase >3 times normal, or imaging findings of pancreatitis). Abdominal CT or MRI obtained in the ED and within 24 h of admission was reviewed by a fellowship-trained abdominal radiologist.

Results

Of 101 patients admitted with AP (60 women, 41 men; mean age 52 years, range 20–89), 63 (62.4%) underwent imaging; only one (1.6%) showed pancreatic necrosis. 88 (87.1%) patients could have been clinically diagnosed without imaging based on presence of abdominal pain and elevated laboratory values; 13 (12.9%) required imaging for diagnosis. Of 88 patients who met AP diagnostic criteria without imaging, 50 (56.8%) nonetheless underwent imaging, with AP without necrosis seen in 34 (68.0%), pancreatic necrosis in one (2.0%), sequelae of prior AP in four (8.0%), and no abnormality in 11 (22.0%).

Conclusion

Early imaging is common in patients with AP, even when the diagnosis can be established based on non-imaging criteria, rarely demonstrating pancreatic necrosis. Reducing overuse of early imaging in patients with confident diagnosis of AP may improve quality and reduce waste.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, et al. (2012) Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143(5):1179–1187

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradley EL (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. (1974) Objective early identification of severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 61(6):443–451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blamey SL, Imrie CW, O’Neill J, Gilmour WH, Carter DC (1984) Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut 25(12):1340–1346

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS (1986) Simplified prognostic criteria in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 1(1):69–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13(10):818–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Larvin M, McMahon MJ (1989) APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet 2(8656):201–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW (1990) Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg 77(11):1260–1264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, et al. (2009) A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 104(4):966–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1261–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62(1):102–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101(10):2379–2400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spanier BWM, Nio Y, van der Hulst RWM, et al. (2010) Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch observational multicenter study. Pancreatology 10(2–3):222–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forsmark CE, Baillie J, AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee, AGA Institute Governing Board (2007) AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 132(5):2022–2044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mortele KJ, Ip IK, Wu BU, et al. (2011) Acute pancreatitis: imaging utilization practices in an urban teaching hospital—analysis of trends with assessment of independent predictors in correlation with patient outcomes. Radiology 258(1):174–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Uomo G, Pezzilli R, Gabbrielli A, et al. (2007) Diagnostic assessment and outcome of acute pancreatitis in Italy: results of a prospective multicentre study. ProInf-AISP: Progetto informatizzato pancreatite acuta, Associazione Italiana Studio Pancreas, phase II. Dig Liver Dis 39(9):829–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology (2005) Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 54(Suppl 3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Toosie K, Chang L, Renslo R, et al. (1997) Early computed tomography is rarely necessary in gallstone pancreatitis. Am Surg 63(10):904–907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spanier BWM, Bruno MJ (2011) Use of early CT scanning in patients with acute pancreatitis. Radiology 260(2):606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. (2012) A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 107(4):612–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Treacy J, Williams A, Bais R, et al. (2001) Evaluation of amylase and lipase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. ANZ J Surg 71(10):577–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yegneswaran B, Pitchumoni CS (2010) When should serum amylase and lipase levels be repeated in a patient with acute pancreatitis? Cleve Clin J Med 77(4):230–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atul B. Shinagare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shinagare, A.B., Ip, I.K., Raja, A.S. et al. Use of CT and MRI in emergency department patients with acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging 40, 272–277 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0210-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0210-1

Keywords

Navigation